the story isn't very convincing as far as there being some kind of organized operation, although it gets a little clearer in the second vid. comments are crazy too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49979474)

and she knocked on a door

and a guy answered

and he had no shirt

and she asked to play

and he said they were asleep

and then

and then

and then

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49979485)

- SP, presumably

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49980058)

the helpful strangers were the scary strangers in their own I Am Legend story

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49979621)

you sound Jewish

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49979942)

There's ample evidence of this shit and has been since at least the 1980s

BUT instead of that these online ape detectives convince themselves that every Burger King bathroom has a secret wormhole to Comet Pizza

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49979995)

If you're talking about tbe existence of child molesters/rapists, sure they have clearly always existed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49980055)

to paraphrase Kenneth V. Lanning, an FBI agent whose life work was exposing and dismantling these child abuse rings: if people's attitude toward child abuse could be summed up in one word, it would be "DENIAL."

he also talked about how the idea of "Stranger Danger" was overemphasized - not that it's bad advice for kids to distrust strangers, they absolutely should, but he said that public panic shifted toward fear of children being abducted by strangers because it was psychologically easier for people to accept that was happening as compared to the fact of the matter, which is that kids are far more often abused and trafficked by people close to them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49980076)

1) real

2) moral panic

3) deliberate psyop like you said

And, if 3, what's the evidence we have for that? I've always been in the camp of "smug lib assuring people the SRA craze was bullshit" but the more I read etc. the more suspicious I get. Still, I'd like some evidence (even if it makes 'sense' that it'd have been a psyop)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49980092)

but from what I've heard from victims and reading between the lines, I think that there was organized SRA within a very, very small group of people, the inner circle of the "Church of Satan." nowhere near the size of the Epstein network, or ya know... Hollywood. the main interview that comes to mind is this one with Zeena Schreck, Anton LaVey's daughter (lol prob the only Jordan Peterson vid I've ever watched): https://youtu.be/EmWXuEKTLcY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49980096)

the michael aquino shit is nuts too

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49980099)

https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-client-list-sex-trafficking-049c96080a2ca2c12c84ac506437e50b

"But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows."

"Videos and photos seized from Epstein’s homes in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands didn’t depict victims being abused or implicate anyone else in his crimes, a prosecutor wrote in one 2025 memo."

...

"Two other Epstein victims who Giuffre had claimed were also “lent out” to powerful men told investigators they had no such experience, prosecutors wrote in a 2019 internal memo.

“No other victim has described being expressly directed by either Maxwell or Epstein to engage in sexual activity with other men,” the memo said.

Giuffre acknowledged writing a partly fictionalized memoir of her time with Epstein containing descriptions of things that didn’t take place. She had also offered shifting accounts in interviews with investigators, they wrote, and had “engaged in a continuous stream of public interviews about her allegations, many of which have included sensationalized if not demonstrably inaccurate characterizations of her experiences.” Those inaccuracies included false accounts of her interactions with the FBI, they said."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879764&forum_id=2...id#49980480)