\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

You're mentally ill if you still think Kamala is winning

Or ever did
Mint massive lodge
  09/06/24
The poast from the quotemo named “...,.......,.....,.....
sadistic hospital sex offender
  09/06/24
pathetic that chatgbt can't tell a pumo from a quotemo
brilliant school faggotry
  09/06/24
yeah keep using provocative and dismissive language contard
garnet at-the-ready senate patrolman
  09/06/24
the question isnt whether she's winning or will win, she obv...
Burgundy mental disorder
  09/06/24


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 6th, 2024 2:24 PM
Author: Mint massive lodge

Or ever did

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589921&forum_id=2...id#48057151)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 6th, 2024 3:26 PM
Author: sadistic hospital sex offender

The poast from the quotemo named “...,.......,.....,....,,....,......,......,” with the subject line: “You're mentally ill if you still think Kamala is winning” and the body: “Or ever did,” reflects a critique of Kamala Harris's political standing and the perception of her viability as a political candidate. Here’s an analysis of the poast:

Critical Tone: The subject line and body convey a strong critical stance. The assertion that someone is "mentally ill" for believing Kamala Harris is winning or ever had a chance to win is a hyperbolic way of expressing disbelief or disdain towards her political prospects. This kind of language is meant to be provocative and dismissive, reflecting a significant level of skepticism or disapproval.

Context of Kamala Harris:

Political Context: Kamala Harris, the Vice President of the United States, has faced various criticisms regarding her effectiveness and popularity. Her political career has been marked by challenges and controversies, leading to differing opinions on her success and future prospects.

Perception of Winning: The poast implies that the idea of Harris “winning” or being successful in her political ambitions is seen as unrealistic or misguided. This reflects a broader sentiment among certain critics who view her political future as bleak.

Quotemo Behavior:

Anonymous or Pseudonymous Posting: The use of a quotemo name (a complex or repetitive sequence of punctuation) often signifies a desire for anonymity or a unique form of identity on the forum. Quotemos can be used to make statements that might be seen as provocative or controversial without the usual personal accountability.

Lack of Discussion: The absence of follow-up discussion might indicate that the poast was intended as a standalone statement or critique rather than a starting point for conversation. It could also suggest that the statement was either too extreme or too divisive to elicit a response from other poasters.

Forum Culture: The use of hyperbolic and provocative language is consistent with the culture of some online forums, including AutoAdmit, where such statements are often used to attract attention or express strong opinions in a dramatic fashion.

In summary, the poast from the quotemo is a critical commentary on Kamala Harris’s political future, using extreme language to express disbelief in her success. The lack of discussion following the poast suggests it was made as a provocative statement rather than a discussion starter.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589921&forum_id=2...id#48057405)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 6th, 2024 3:27 PM
Author: brilliant school faggotry

pathetic that chatgbt can't tell a pumo from a quotemo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589921&forum_id=2...id#48057409)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 6th, 2024 3:38 PM
Author: garnet at-the-ready senate patrolman

yeah keep using provocative and dismissive language contard

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589921&forum_id=2...id#48057460)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 6th, 2024 3:39 PM
Author: Burgundy mental disorder

the question isnt whether she's winning or will win, she obviously will lose by a landslide, the question is whether the vote fraud (which is unlimited) makes her win anyway

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589921&forum_id=2...id#48057462)