Anglcan 'Church' launches fast casual spirtual chain,"New Things," in 9 dioceses
| nighttime selfie | 08/22/24 | | Chartreuse impertinent halford dilemma | 08/22/24 | | gay base | 08/22/24 | | Beta Ungodly Field | 08/22/24 | | gay base | 08/22/24 | | impressive balding cuck state | 08/22/24 | | Multi-colored cowardly juggernaut | 08/22/24 | | odious massive kitchen pozpig | 08/22/24 | | gay base | 08/22/24 | | Floppy aquamarine native | 08/22/24 | | yapping idiot | 08/22/24 | | Multi-colored cowardly juggernaut | 08/22/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 22nd, 2024 8:01 AM Author: nighttime selfie
https://unherd.com/2024/08/why-cant-the-church-say-church/
A recent study of the word church — if I can still use that word — across 11 Dioceses of the Church of England (see, it’s tricky to avoid) has found that “in the past 10 years, about 900 ‘New Things’ have been started. None of the 11 dioceses used the word ‘church’ as its main descriptor of such developments.” In other words, the Church has given up on church.
And it has been a ruinously expensive business. At a time when ordinary parish churches such as mine are being asked for ever greater contributions to the central church coffers, the New Things corporate headquarters has ploughed at least £82.7 million into New Things. As the report explains, this “new ecclesial language” has happened “very quickly” and is “affecting an operant theology within the Church of England”. This is former oil executive Justin Welby’s principal contribution to the development of the Church of England. As the report admits, “loosed from theological roots, the conceptual framework inevitably looks for other sources for its guidance, namely business and management theory.”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5580764&forum_id=2...id#47992766)
|
|
|