Key points:

The counter-elite's motivations: The counter-elite seeks to challenge the established elite's power and influence.

The role of economics and math: The author suggests focusing on economics and math to engage with those who support the establishment.

The underlying issues: The author argues that the Trump phenomenon is a manifestation of deeper issues, such as economic inequality, immigration, and government policies.

The "deep state": The author discusses the concept of the "deep state" as an unelected civil service that has entrenched itself and seeks to maintain its power.

Leo Strauss and his influence: The author explores the life and teachings of Leo Strauss, a philosopher whose ideas have influenced both neoconservatives and members of the populist right.

The "East Coast" vs. "West Coast" Straussians: The author differentiates between the two schools of thought within the Straussian movement, with the East Coast Straussians being more aligned with neoconservatism and the West Coast Straussians being more focused on a counter-elite revolution.

The red lines of the counter-elite: The author argues that both the established elite and the counter-elite maintain a strict zero-tolerance policy towards discussing Jewish exceptionalism.

Overall, the blog post suggests that the counter-elite's effectiveness may be hindered by its reluctance to address certain topics, particularly those related to Jewish exceptionalism. It calls for a more honest and open dialogue to achieve its objectives.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062370)

The GameCube could be seen as a "counter-elite" console in its own right. Unlike the PlayStation 2 and Xbox, which dominated the console market at the time, the GameCube took a different approach, focusing on innovative gameplay and a more niche appeal. This aligns with the author's emphasis on challenging the status quo and seeking alternative perspectives.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062376)

Ironically, one of the critical passages in Alamariu’s dissertation concerns a moment in a Platonic dialogue when Socrates seems to best his interlocutor Callicles, whose views anticipate Alamariu’s own. Callicles calls for an aggressive, virile pursuit of open political power in the name of philosophical superiority. Socrates warns that such a course, in fact, will show Callicles to be the same type of person as an effeminate “catamite” who is guided only by his own pleasure.

Alamariu performs some awkward hermeneutic wrangling to argue that Callicles, “shamed” into silence by this comparison, should in fact be understood to represent what Plato took to be the better argument….In our time, the social context for either of the Straussian solutions—rational collection action guided by political rhetoric or authentic private thought at a safe distance from public life—appears to be disappearing, if it is not already absent. In such an era, discursive games of seduction as practiced by Bloom and Alamariu may still be bring attention and profit to those who play them, but seem capable neither of defending nor truly endangering our decadent regime."

this is really dumb and dishonest. i don't know who you're quoting here, but this person just cherry-picked the portion of the book where socrates uses a "you're gay lol" slur against callicles, and is then attempting to use the same "you're gay omg" slur against BAP by association in order to try to discredit him and his ideas. this is 106 IQ reddit stuff

you should just read BAP's book. it is short, will take you less than a day to read, and contains the most important philosophical ideas in several decades. it's obvious that you haven't read it, because you wouldn't copy and paste a passage like the above if you had - you'd have pulled a more sophisticated criticism from morrison's essay (which you also clearly haven't read)

the straussians in general have been mostly smart and good dudes. of course they're quite jewish - so has every intellectual movement in the west been since the early 20th century. saying that straussians are Zionist Bad Guys because the bush administration zionists called themselves 'straussians' is like saying that fascism is bad because the nazis were supposedly fascists

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062467)

'selective breeding' is the book you should read and contains his actual philosophical ideas. the main takeaways are the tension between the nomos (conventional wisdom of the feminine, domesticated herd) and the philosopher, who is/has been the only source of innovation throughout human history, because he is separate from the herd and is therefore free to explore and question and create. as well as the link between the philosopher and the tyrant, who is the actualization of the philosopher: a man who uses his superior knowledge and understanding of the world to become its master

there are other ideas too, like the significance and importance of breeding re: cultivation of human capital to avoid the degeneration into nomos, but those aren't quite as important or easy to explain in one paragraph

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062502)

Furthermore the failure of Platonism in this regard is in fact entirely separate from any substantial teaching or doctrine: as is apparent in the passage just quoted, the problem is when religion oversteps its bounds and becomes sovereign, as opposed to its being a useful tool of the statesman or the philosopher. This overreach, the possibility for this kind of priestly authority, is rooted in the peculiar origins of Christianity as a revealed religion and in the historical peculiarities of the late Roman world that adopted this new faith.

Let us remember that the Platonic teaching is profitable to a late-stage civilization and therefore entirely inappropriate to the cultural and spiritual life of barbarians who are just about to be civilized for the first time. In this case Platonic morality, as interpreted by Christianity, corrupts, stunts, misbreeds, tames."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062533)

but according to this thesis, this was only the exoteric intent of the greek philosophers: in reality, the binding of the philosopher and the state is a compromise of necessity, which allows the normies and the philosophers to co-exist in civilization, and the philosophers to secretly steer the beliefs and direction of society, and the pursuit of novel ideas and progress, from their safety within the state and elite apparatus

i don't know if the historical portion of this thesis is accurate. it's at best an educated guess based on inferences from writings from 2500 years ago. but in practice, it's correct, and the conclusions that they draw seem to be correct as well: if the above compromise was ever true and real, it's certainly no longer true and real today: the putative "philosophers" of our current state religion and elite are openly hostile to freedom of thought and inquiry, and the state and the nomos have become an overwhelming existential threat to philosophers, free thought, and human progress, and this requires decisive action against them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062587)

"This is why Jasun Horsley argues, 'My view is simple to the point of seeming simple-minded to some: if a disseminator of 'dissidence' has a platform of more than 100K followers—or the equivalent in terms of being centered in the alt-media—I generally don’t waste my time on them… I am not saying they must be a shill to have such high numbers behind them. But, at the very least, they can’t be rocking any serious boats.' Rurik Skywalker agrees. Taking it further, James Delingpole and Guido Preparata argue in this interesting interview that any major philosophical, scientific, or political figure of the past multiple-hundreds years has been a controlled agent for alternative, nefarious purposes."

TL;DR -- Obscure shithead politith substackers who no one cares about or bothers to follow (like OP) are in unanimous agreement that if you're popular and people bother to follow you, it's ackkkkkkkshually proof that you're the REAL loser and that you AREN'T worth following. ("Trust us, we know these things... PS: please remember to subscribe so that we can gain more followers and hopefully start making some money.")

LJL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062818)

(((Consuela))): "In reality, all of the 'famous thinkers' of the last 500 that you stupid sheeple have been foolishly 'studying' were ackkkkshually just controlled agents serving Jewish power -- unlike me and my small band of favored obscure substack bros, who are the REAL geniuses out here doing the REAL hard work to fight against ZOG. BTW you can tell that assertion is true by the fact that no one follows us or gives a shit about what we have to say.

PS: Please, don't forget to subsc -- huh? what? Am *I* Jewish? I'm not going to answer that, and please stop asking me. Anyway, like I was saying, PLEASE don't forget to subsc..."

L,JL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062855)

The paid subscription option is turned off, there hasn't been a penny of revenue received from this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062862)

You say this mockingly, but (((Consuela))) literally pushes the "theory" that Adolf Hitler was just a Jewish stooge backed and supported by Mastermind Jews SPECIFICALLY to lead to the conditions necessary for the foundation of the State of Israel. Whenever you stop huffing that copium and accept the TRUE blackpilled reality of life, you'll realize that everything that happened in Germany/Europe in the 1930s and early 1940s was exactly what Jews WANTED to happen, and in fact the Jews basically planned it all out ahead of time and then brilliantly executed on their plan. Checkmate, retarded "Neo-Nazis"... you idiots are still playing right into Jewish hands with your stupid and deeply misguided "antisemitism," and you don't even realize it!

It's honestly like 18079^987797 Chess at this point... no wonder Jews sneer at Y*hw*h, His puny brain clearly has nothing on their unfathomable collective intelligence!

(PS: The fact that Jews often seem to be remarkably shitty at engaging in strategic second- and third-order thinking in many other realms of modern day life and also seem to have a long and well-documented history of overplaying their hands and getting blown the fuck out when backlash inevitably strike has an elegant explanation which proves they are ackkkkkshually incredible strategic geniuses in those cases, as well, but your smooth little midwit goy brain couldn't possibly begin to process this explanation so I won't bother typing it out here, even though I totally could if I wanted to. Anyways, gotta go -- Dark Elf Friend signing off!)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48063152)

consuela is an expert on jews pretending to hate jews to further the jewish agenda.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48063160)

*brain explodes*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48063161)

Sorry I don't read retarded kike trash at this point in my life, no offense brother

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48063165)

CR, just like Fauci!

(Also LJL @ "b-b-but he studied at THE VATICAN!" In 2024, "The Vatican" is one of the biggest festering dens of degenerate atheistic power-hungry homosexuals on the planet, and almost all of the skinsuitted top members of the Catholic clergy are spiritually, if not ethnically, Jewish. Imagine pretending otherwise -- and you pose as a sharp-eyed realist who sees through the bullshit.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48063172)

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/how-globohomo-skinsuited-the-catholic

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48063202)

it's not even Blank Slatism. it's a level of delusion even beyond that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062896)

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-egalitarian-ratchet-effect-why

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062903)

it's like a woman going through her past week of life experience and cherrypicking various events that seem to have been vaguely related to her astrological forecast for that week, and then thinking to herself that her astrological forecast was right all along

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48062936)

regardless, it is a ridiculous proposition. plenty of things that were brutally repressed by the state eventually achieved mainstream appeal. tbf's hitler example. black rights activists being killed during the civil rights era. even donald trump.

history is replete with ideas contrary to the existing power structure being brutally repressed until they finally achieve mainstream appeal and the structure either changes to adapt to it or is completely reinvented.

as i said at the outset, knowing all of this, the only possible explanation would be that these brutal repressions of new ideas and policy was *actually* just 8-D chess to provide window dressing for the real suppression mechanism. which is schizo levels of insane conspiracy and would require extraordinary evidence to prove. which you don't have, which is precisely why you rely on your marginalization as proof.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48063364)

david lynch is a clearly a straussian. twin peaks the return is the definitive esoteric history of the post war US deep state/uniparty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5590690&forum_id=2...id#48063991)