Why did Hillary refuse to go to "Wisconsin" ?
| stubborn grizzly locus | 06/28/22 | | Hilarious zombie-like useless brakes reading party | 06/28/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 06/28/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 06/28/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 06/28/22 | | Magenta bull headed pozpig tanning salon | 06/28/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 06/28/22 | | Cheese-eating Range Pisswyrm | 06/28/22 | | Bright property | 06/28/22 | | Crimson Abusive Heaven Stain | 06/28/22 | | turquoise stimulating sneaky criminal hell | 06/28/22 | | galvanic clear athletic conference | 06/28/22 | | Flesh trip dilemma | 06/28/22 | | excitant site regret | 06/28/22 | | haunting mad-dog skullcap theatre | 06/28/22 | | sooty learning disabled sound barrier | 06/28/22 | | Greedy point queen of the night | 06/28/22 | | high-end cerebral partner | 06/28/22 | | Vivacious Fanboi Locale | 06/28/22 | | Fuchsia sticky step-uncle's house | 06/28/22 | | rambunctious brunch milk | 06/28/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 07/08/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 10/18/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 10/26/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 11/19/22 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 01/21/23 | | Laughsome costumed gunner foreskin | 01/21/23 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 01/21/23 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 09/12/23 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 09/16/23 | | Concupiscible obsidian sweet tailpipe | 09/06/24 | | Pale marvelous private investor | 09/06/24 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 10/18/24 | | Bright property | 10/18/24 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 04/19/25 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 04/27/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 11/21/25 | | evan39 | 11/21/25 | | spherequeer | 11/21/25 | | hideous hominid | 06/28/22 | | comical trust fund volcanic crater | 10/27/22 | | cobalt state really tough guy | 06/28/22 | | spruce telephone theater stage | 06/28/22 | | Fishy Disturbing Parlour | 06/28/22 | | ruddy pungent principal's office | 10/18/22 | | Cracking glassy house multi-billionaire | 09/16/23 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 09/06/24 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 09/06/24 | | stubborn grizzly locus | 09/06/24 | | Bright property | 10/18/24 | | spherequeer | 11/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 28th, 2022 1:13 AM Author: Hilarious zombie-like useless brakes reading party
Brooklyn grew weary of endless field requests for signs and pamphlets, and insisted that big data would win the state for Clinton.
"I don't want to hear any more crap about volunteers or door knocking in Wisconsin, okay?" snapped an angry Mook after a particularly heated conference call. "The computer says Wisconsin is solid blue, got it? Solid blue!" he yelled.
Others were horrified when Mook sank $1.7 million into an app designed to energize the transgender vote in California, a state where Clinton already held an enormous lead. After Trump's election, it was revealed that the app yielded only eighteen new voter registrations, or approximately $94,000 per vote.
http://politico.com/election2016/mook-and-dnc-were-overconfident-from-the-start.htm
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5141308&forum_id=2...id#44757342) |
Date: September 6th, 2024 1:20 PM Author: stubborn grizzly locus
Mainlining’s use of quotes around “Wisconsin” is intriguing, and it feels like a subtle or ironic jab. The quotes might imply that "Wisconsin" represents something larger, perhaps a symbol of the Clinton campaign’s perceived neglect of key battleground states. By using quotes, Mainlining could be suggesting that the campaign viewed Wisconsin as a kind of abstract, irrelevant place—almost fictional in their strategy. Alternatively, it might play into a broader skepticism, implying the Clinton campaign treated Wisconsin's political importance as something unreal, which could reflect how the state was overlooked in her campaign.
As for Evan39’s fictional news excerpt, the humor lies in its clever satire of what some perceived as the mismanagement of Clinton's 2016 campaign. Evan39 captures this by caricaturing campaign manager Robby Mook, portraying him as overly reliant on data and dismissive of grassroots efforts. The line “The computer says Wisconsin is solid blue, got it? Solid blue!” mocks the overconfidence some believed the campaign had in their analytics, while ignoring more practical, boots-on-the-ground campaigning.
The exaggerated detail about spending $1.7 million on an app to mobilize the transgender vote in California—a state Clinton already dominated—amplifies the absurdity. It underscores Evan39’s critique that resources were wasted on areas that didn’t need attention, at the expense of battleground states like Wisconsin. The $94,000-per-vote calculation is an over-the-top punchline, heightening the absurdity and inefficiency.
Evan39’s fake hyperlink at the end—“http://politico.com/election2016/mook-and-dnc-were-overconfident-from-the-start.htm”—is a signature move of his, giving the post a veneer of authenticity while letting the reader know it’s entirely fabricated. It mirrors the way headlines might sound in real outlets like Politico or The New York Times, but it's his way of slyly blending fiction with the style of real reporting.
Overall, both Mainlining and Evan39 are tapping into a shared skepticism and dark humor surrounding the 2016 election, with each using different tools to express their critique.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5141308&forum_id=2...id#48056876) |
|
|