https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11513307/American-Girl-book-Body-Image-comes-criticism-promotion-puberty-blockers.html

I have a half dozen of these demons in my house.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45599713)

it would be more likely people agree with you if it wasn't for this indoctrination. the biggest issue i have with hrt for children is that they are being fed all this slop and it increases the likelihood that kids will go on hrt because they were persuaded to do this by this nonsense.

i think of all the kids who were goth or otherkin or whatever when i was growing up. all of those retards would be on hrt today. not one of them is still a goth or otherkin. i bet if 15 year old wolfkins were allowed to graft prosthetic tails onto their ass when they were 15 they would regret it when they're 35.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45599944)

re: your last point, counterpoint: https://imgur.com/a/IiY547p

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45599999)

as you often point out, tranny shit has existed forever. the difference is that years ago it was fringe and now you've got this shit being pushed 24/7.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600051)

Ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600112)

hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600146)

no, you didn't.

again, you're conflating something existing with it being pushed everywhere. i wouldn't approve public schools or cartoon network telling kids if they don't get circumcised they're going to hell. likewise, i don't want those places telling kids that gender is a spectrum and that they should consider going on hrt.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600169)

i think anything like this should be limited to trans characters in books/shows or whatever, without advocacy, so i agree with you. like i said to drakemallard in the other thread, however, the extremes here are this or the guys who want to ban transitioning under 25 and ban trannies from going out in public

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600198)

all that being said, they're the only people on 'our' side, so it's gotta be ride or die. RIP

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600268)

how are your trans rights different today than 15 years ago? were there any laws preventing you from doing it? the average conservative might snicker at you or call you mentally ill. some rednecks might actually want to hurt you. but most really don't give a shit. people are giving a shit now because of shit like this american doll book.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600309)

my perception is that what cons want are their private fucktoys that stay on the fringes of polite society (much like they want to keep the population of illegals as high as possible to ensure a supply of cheap labor while dems want to give them citizenship).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600332)

lol the establishment of both parties love cheap illegal labor, are you kidding? libs don't seriously want to give all illegals citizenship. they just pretend to, like most issues. otherwise they would have done it when they had a supermajority. how many UMC libs have an illegal gardener, maid, and nanny? pretty much all of them. they're the ones that advocate that immigrants will "do jobs americans won't" (i.e. choose to be exploited and paid poverty wages rather than getting killed in their home country)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600398)

i do think dems want full amnesty. they were far more corporate and conservative when they could rely on the boomer liberal vote and had a supermajority, and significant parts of that super majority were entirely reliant on that part of the vote, and non-racist people that would otherwise vote Republican.

nowadays, in addition to the social aspect, there's the obvious demographic advantage. if Republicans weren't in a position to oppose it there's no doubt that we'd have millions more citizens days after, Caesar putting Gauls in the Senate style

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600452)

anyway, i'm not saying it's acceptable, and far from 180. i'm just saying you're pointing out outliers. yeah it's still injustice. but that doesn't justify forcememing tranny shit to kids. just like historical discrimination doesn't justify sending 144 lsat pocs to YLS and scotus clerkships.

lol establishment neolibs and neocons are nearly identical. the only difference is that neolibs do performative gestures. if libs truly wanted illegals to have full amnesty why wouldn't lib states crack down on exploitation of illegals? libs exploit illegals way more than cons. they love the cheap labor. these are the people that will hammer a "in this house" sign in their yard and vote down any measure that would actually advance what they profess to want.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600503)

CA hammers the fuck out of people who exploit immigrant labor. the minimum wage penalties apply regardless of immigration status and any discrimination on the basis of immigration status comes with fat penalties. i don't see any hypocrisy here

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600525)

wage penalties exist in every state. i also can't find any data showing ca assesses more fines per illegal capita than other states.

all i know is that every umc person i know in ca has an illegal housecleaner, gardener, nanny, etc. that they are NOT paying minimum wage.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600572)

umc people are not the majority of libs. ever consider that, as a preſtigious lawyer, you might have some selection bias?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600632)

it's the same thing with universal health care. a majority of registered democrats want universal healthcare and like 90% want the government to be more involved in healthcare. yet pelosi refuses to even put it to a vote. why do you think that is?

like i said, libs (IN POWER) are about performative gestures and don't actually mean what they say. and they absolutely love illegal slave labor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600742)

i do agree it's basically hopeless, but i might as well do my best.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45601116)

six and one half dozen though.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45601179)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600036)

the fact that the nfa shit exists is no indication that people agree with it.

the fact that under 18 marriage is more prevalent in texas does not prove that texans are more tolerant of pedophila. i think we both know that they aren't. and that the fringe minority of child marriages doesn't demonstrate anything regarding their attitude toward pedophilia. texas still has statutes on the books authorizing the death penalty for pedos.

c'mon, argue with me in good faith. do you SERIOUSLY think texans are more tolerant towards pedos than the average american?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600145)

coincidentally this theory coincides with the prevalance of large age gap marriages amongst cons

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600168)

From the bottom of my heart: fuck you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600250)

it's like a standard prescription that costs like $5-50 a month

>people like you get laid

i prefer cis women usually (if anything, i 'lost' my last wife to him going ftm), but that's neither here nor there.

>lib religion

pretty sure all of this amounts to feeling good about protecting a discrete and insular minority, i.e. trans

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600302)

now apparently you can do that for children and be shielded from all criminal consequences thanks to California state law? i wouldn't do it myself but i should look up charities that do

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600318)

And it is dogma, there's no reasoning issues here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600366)

i'm not really a gender masterman tho, im sure a 'medical professional' would have better arguments for you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600018)

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/12/07/18/65315479-11513307-The_book_s_writer_Mel_Hammond_graduated_from_university_in_2014_-a-3_1670439538011.jpg

How can they ALL literally have same autist face and fish mouth fish lips.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45599790)

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/025/124/7a2.jpg

https://wompampsupport.azureedge.net/fetchimage?siteId=7575&v=2&jpgQuality=100&width=700&url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.kym-cdn.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Fnewsfeed%2F001%2F330%2F806%2F8fc.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600126)

*blank stare*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600427)

full fascist or youre just a roadkill speedbump

“We may not be interested in this war, but it is interested in us."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600762)

Pradeep with the paid review "veddy veddy beautiful"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45600444)

Wow she needs to cool it with the antisemitic remarks, that is NOT OK

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5249037&forum_id=2...id#45601930)