When the Chinese government announced a new visa to attract young science and technology talent, it advertised the move as another step toward becoming the leading scientific power, one to which people from around the globe would flock.

To many in China, it was a gross mistake.

In the days before and since Oct. 1, when the visa was supposed to come into effect, commenters have accused the government of inviting foreigners to steal jobs from Chinese people, at a time when young people are finding it harder than ever to land work. They have suggested that foreigners are being blindly worshiped, a longstanding national sore point.

Prominent influencers have also stoked nationalism or xenophobia, claiming that China will be overrun by outsiders. After Henry Huiyao Wang, the president of the Center for China and Globalization, a research group in Beijing, praised the new visa, people on social media called him a race traitor, and their posts were shared thousands of times.

Platforms have been especially flooded by racist comments about Indians, after Indian news outlets reported on the Chinese visa as a possible alternative to the highly popular H1-B visa in the United States, which now comes with a $100,000 fee.

The backlash grew so fierce that the Chinese Communist Party’s official mouthpiece, People’s Daily, published an editorial calling criticisms of the visa “outlandish” and accusing opponents of misleading the public. Hu Xijin, the former editor in chief of Global Times, a nationalist tabloid, defended the policy, saying in a video that he saw fewer foreigners in China than in Japan or South Korea.

“To be honest, it’s not that there are too many foreigners coming to China right now,” he said, “but rather that there aren’t enough.”

The public outcry suggests that China may still struggle to attract the world’s best and brightest scientists, even as the United States has cut research funding and pushed many prominent scholars to consider leaving.

Anti-foreign sentiment has grown in China in recent years, as the government has warned of hostile overseas powers and urged people to report potential spies. China has historically had minuscule levels of inbound immigration, and many cultural and legal barriers remain for foreigners seeking to remain long-term.

When the government proposed slightly loosening permanent residency requirements for foreigners in 2020, it eventually retreated in the face of a similar backlash. (China granted fewer than 5,000 permanent residency cards between 2004 and 2014, according to People’s Daily.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5786457&forum_id=2...id#49349110)

Indians have a right to not live around Indians 😡

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5786457&forum_id=2...id#49349121)

Platforms have been especially flooded by racist comments about Indians, after Indian news outlets reported on the Chinese visa as a possible alternative to the highly popular H1-B visa in the United States, which now comes with a $100,000 fee."

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5786457&forum_id=2...id#49349147)

Do they know screaming racism won’t work with non whites?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5786457&forum_id=2...id#49349152)

The backlash grew so fierce that the Chinese Communist Party’s official mouthpiece, People’s Daily, published an editorial calling criticisms of the visa “outlandish” and accusing opponents of misleading the public. Hu Xijin, the former editor in chief of Global Times, a nationalist tabloid, defended the policy, saying in a video that he saw fewer foreigners in China than in Japan or South Korea.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5786457&forum_id=2...id#49350170)

Why is wanting your government to look after its own citizens first nationalistic or xenophobic?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5786457&forum_id=2...id#49349176)

Maybe you meant to ask why is there a negative connotation for those words in that specific context

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5786457&forum_id=2...id#49350108)