The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NFL Game tonight shows problem with gambling partnerships
| ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, | 10/24/24 |
| t14 | 10/24/24 |
| ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, | 10/24/24 |
| ,,,...,,......,,....,,,,,,,,....... | 10/24/24 |
| ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, | 10/25/24 |
| bloomington | 10/24/24 |
| .,.,..,,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,.,.. | 10/24/24 |
| .;:..;:;.:.;.,,,.,.:,.;;,;;;..;, | 10/25/24 |
| Young and fresh Bboooooooooom | 10/25/24 |
| Young and fresh Bboooooooooom | 10/25/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 24th, 2024 11:33 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, Just end the game on an obvious facemask (probably the most egregious i've ever seen given that the tackle wouldn't have been made but for the facemask)
Before you could just chalk it up to ineptitude but now all of Twitter is wanting money back on their bets (and they're not wrong) |
Date: October 24th, 2024 11:34 PM Author: t14 Why is some shit reviewable on replay, but other stuff isn't when it obviously should be (like the face mask)? This is an issue in every single sport with replay or challenges (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617730&forum_id=2...id.#48237626) |
 |
Date: October 24th, 2024 11:39 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, I think the argument is that you can always find some penalty on each play in the NFL. Like you can always rewind and find holding or PI if you look hard enough.
But given NFL review is challenge based, it does seem like there should be some sort of review for everything currently unreviewable, but to overturn it the standard should be it must be (i) immediately clear and obvious and (ii) clearly have a direct impact on the outcome of the play.
Then you could overturn shit like this or that obvoius PI call in the playoffs where the receiver got pushed over - stuff like that. |
|
Date: October 24th, 2024 11:56 PM Author: ,,,...,,......,,....,,,,,,,,....... Counterpoint- face mask penalties are mostly just for player safety. It will get ridiculous if people start challenging stuff like whether there was unnecessary roughness. Life isn’t always fair. I’d argue all the replay review has made the NFL and modern sports objectively worse. It feels soft and objectively Asian (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617730&forum_id=2...id.#48237664) |
|
Date: October 25th, 2024 12:47 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, But you'd still be covered under my rule. Here the tackle probably wouldn't have been made if not for the facemask.
If you had it where the facemask had nothing to do with the play then it isn't reversed. |
|
Date: October 24th, 2024 11:45 PM Author: bloomington (🦬) I turned it on just for the last two minutes hoping to see the Vikings lose. I'm not disappointed and I don't care that the Vikings got screwed.
LOL at the gambling degens though. Vikes were still down by 8 and had to go 95 yards to score a TD when that went down. |
|
Date: October 24th, 2024 11:58 PM CR. Missed facemask was bullshit, but this is harmless error. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617730&forum_id=2...id.#48237669) |
|
Date: October 25th, 2024 1:07 AM Author: .;:..;:;.:.;.,,,.,.:,.;;,;;;..;, (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617730&forum_id=2...id.#48237826) |
|
Date: October 25th, 2024 1:32 AM Author: Young and fresh Bboooooooooom (Fraud@fraud.com) Current sport is fraud like the rest (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617730&forum_id=2...id.#48237853) |
|
Date: October 25th, 2024 1:31 AM Author: Young and fresh Bboooooooooom (Fraud@fraud.com) Ljl (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617730&forum_id=2...id.#48237852) |