wouldn't want to live in a natural disaster danger zone
| .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::, | 01/08/25 | | Mainlining the Secret Truth of the Mahchine | 01/08/25 | | .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::, | 01/08/25 | | Mainlining the Secret Truth of the Mahchine | 01/08/25 | | hank_scorpio | 01/08/25 | | .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::, | 01/08/25 | | evan39 | 01/08/25 | | jahjr | 01/08/25 | | .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::, | 01/08/25 | | Brother Peter Dimond | 01/08/25 | | .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::, | 01/08/25 | | Brother Peter Dimond | 01/08/25 | | .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::, | 01/08/25 | | Brother Peter Dimond | 01/08/25 | | .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::, | 01/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 8th, 2025 12:56 AM
Author: .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::,
west coast earthquakes / fires
florida / gulf coast hurricanes
just wouldn't live there. there are other places to live.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5660681&forum_id=2...id.#48530382) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 12:57 AM
Author: .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::,
pnw is a big one brother
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5660681&forum_id=2...id.#48530385) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 1:11 AM
Author: .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::,
and einstein and people with downs syndrome both have brains
https://hazards.fema.gov/nri/map
https://ncdp.columbia.edu/us-natural-hazards-index/
you can live around miami where you can duly expect to have to evacuate once every five years or so, face nonzero risk of property damage or even complete devastation. or you can live in say pittsburgh and not have to worry about anything more than a record snowstorm that probably won't damage your home unless a fortuitous tree happens to fall on it, or a stray tornado which will hit maybe 20 homes out of many thousands.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5660681&forum_id=2...id.#48530431) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 1:12 AM
Author: .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::,
see above comment
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5660681&forum_id=2...id.#48530433) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 1:15 AM
Author: .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::,
flood areas are good to avoid. tornadoes to some extent but the danger area is very wide and damage is usually highly concentrated and random.
the whole city of san francisco was once leveled by an earthquake and it will happen again. not every structure is proofed to the max. to say nothing of related tsunami risk which would render mere quakeproofing irrelevant. idk why someone would want to deal with that.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5660681&forum_id=2...id.#48530444) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2025 1:45 AM
Author: .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::,
maybe i'm just not educated enough on the risk zones but tornado risk areas seem like mostly undesirable places to live anyways. all the mass devastation tornado events seem to be in rural mississippi or equivalent. can't think of a time i heard of a tornado hitting a nice suburb or urban area and taking out more than a couple of blocks or something.
the worst flood areas other than coastal hurricane zones also seem to be shit river towns.
meanwhile we have global cities built atop fault lines and subduction zones that are just ticking time bombs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5660681&forum_id=2...id.#48530488) |
Date: January 8th, 2025 9:40 AM
Author: .,.,.;;,;.,..,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.;.:...:.,:.::,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5660681&forum_id=2...id.#48531034) |
|
|