fact check:

USA 98-100

India 82-85

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5672977&forum_id=2...id.#48606207)

doing IQ for a huge diverse country like india is lolzy hard, its better to look at GMAT and GRE scores

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5672977&forum_id=2...id.#48606223)

lol sure dumb poopnigga

The USA is big and diverse too

Your “people” are even a step below trailer trash meth heads

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5672977&forum_id=2...id.#48606232)

Is that browncope?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5672977&forum_id=2...id.#48606273)

The above scores were the result of Lynn's (or whatever his name was) study that was actually scientific and methodological

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5672977&forum_id=2...id.#48606334)

for india i think they used like three tests and two of them were for tribal niggas, there are scores of other tests indicating much higher IQ

the fact u retards cannot even anaylyze this and just recite same shit over and over shows how low IQ birdshits are

https://www.reddit.com/r/thebronzemovement/comments/rtkh73/the_iq_of_indians/

https://international-iq-test.com/en/test/IQ_by_country

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5672977&forum_id=2...id.#48606354)

Yes, some aspects of IQ studies, including parts of the work by Richard Lynn and others that contributed to discussions on "Flynn's effect" and global IQ estimates, have been criticized for using proxies rather than direct measurement in certain countries. Here are the key points:

### **Flynn's Work vs. Lynn and Vanhanen's Global IQ Studies**

- James Flynn's primary work focused on the phenomenon of rising IQ scores over time (the "Flynn Effect"). He emphasized methodological rigor and cultural factors influencing intelligence measurement.

- However, studies by **Lynn and Vanhanen**, which Flynn frequently critiqued, were more controversial because they attempted to estimate national IQs for many countries.

### **Use of GDP and Neighboring Country Estimates**

- In cases where direct IQ data were not available, **Lynn and Vanhanen often used economic indicators (like per capita GDP)** as proxies for estimating a country's average IQ.

- In other cases, they extrapolated IQ values from **neighboring countries with similar cultural or economic contexts**.

- This approach has been criticized for being methodologically weak, as GDP and neighboring country IQs are imperfect and culturally biased proxies for measuring cognitive ability.

### **Criticism of the Methodology**

- Many psychologists and researchers have pointed out that using GDP and geographic approximations introduces significant biases and ignores local educational, nutritional, and cultural factors.

- Flynn himself criticized these studies, arguing for more careful cross-cultural research and acknowledging that intelligence is shaped by complex environmental and genetic factors.

Would you like more details on specific countries or criticisms of these methods?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5672977&forum_id=2...id.#48606437)

Yeah, I’m sure he’ll crush it there. Dems can put some average Joe type white guy up against him and they’ll win easily.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5672977&forum_id=2...id.#48606972)