Explain the argument Trump’s lawyer is making here
| Enigmas never age tp | 07/20/25 | | VoteRepublican | 07/20/25 | | Chief People Officer | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | buttfaggot | 07/20/25 | | CapTTTainFalcon | 07/20/25 | | MAGA Farm Animals Reeking of Trump Cologne | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | MAGA Farm Animals Reeking of Trump Cologne | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | Enigmas never age tp | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/20/25 | | UN peacekeeper | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/20/25 | | Enigmas never age tp | 07/20/25 | | ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, | 07/20/25 | | Enigmas never age tp | 07/20/25 | | Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband | 07/20/25 | | OldHLSDude | 07/20/25 | | Enigmas never age tp | 07/20/25 | | Malicious Pedophile Crew (MPC) | 07/20/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/20/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 07/20/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,,
This is a dumb Tweet and a dumb thread.
They're trying to show that the libel was spread not just among the WSJ subscribers, but to hundreds of millions of people.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2...id.#49116437) |
 |
Date: July 20th, 2025 4:47 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
If you interpret "exclusive" to mean subscribers-only, then the fact that it was widely disseminated might reflect to intent to make it more broadly known. However I've always interpreted it to mean "only we have this info," which a media org often does with articles it runs paywall-free. They serve as advertising for the publication sometimes.
I also think a lot of stuff gets published paywall-free when it's just really important. Like when the NY times was reporting about Trump bombing Iran, I believe all of it was paywall-free. The WSJ would presumably do that if it had something exclusive and with that level of significance. They made a lot of shit paywall-free when Flynn went down in 2017. Their ukraineshit is sometimes paywall-free
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752584&forum_id=2...id.#49116932) |
|
|