Criminal appeals lawyer taking some Q's.
| comical canary gaping | 06/11/26 | | Vibrant mustard trust fund shitlib | 06/11/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/11/26 | | Vibrant mustard trust fund shitlib | 06/11/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/11/26 | | Vibrant mustard trust fund shitlib | 06/11/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/11/26 | | Heady Corner | 06/11/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/11/26 | | Heady Corner | 06/12/26 | | Mentally impaired irradiated school jewess | 06/11/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/11/26 | | Mentally impaired irradiated school jewess | 06/11/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/11/26 | | Mentally impaired irradiated school jewess | 06/11/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/11/26 | | chrome scourge upon the earth | 06/11/26 | | Stimulating Orchestra Pit Reading Party | 06/11/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/12/26 | | big mediation | 06/12/26 | | comical canary gaping | 06/12/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 11th, 2026 3:40 PM Author: comical canary gaping
It's very chill, except all the administrative bullshit is a headache.
Client comms are annoying --- scanning their letters, printing out my letters and filed briefs for them, putting them in envelopes and stamping them, writing letters to them explaining that their proposed issues are stupid.
And then the CA courts are stuck in the 80s. For all the talk of AI, half the courts are still sending out transcripts in paper form. Scanning in records is a colossal waste of time.
And then there's all the claims/billing crap.
All the other stuff is annoying. But the actual legal work is really 180
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873176&forum_id=2...id.#49931294) |
 |
Date: June 12th, 2026 7:13 PM Author: comical canary gaping
Barring rare exceptions,* they're all guilty of something. Doesn't mean they're not grossly overcharged, an idiot stattte court trial judge didn't make some big legal error or make a technical mistake in the calculation of sentencing, or the scum prosecutor didn't cheat, or certain counts weren't properly proven.
Exceptional cases I've had: a he said / she said date rape case between two high school kids and the girl thought she was pregnant and cried rape after... a couple true self-defense cases where an aggressive DA wanted to prosecute someone just because you have a dead guy, and the jury splits the baby and comes back with manslaughter instead of murder just because they also feel obligated to punish someone for a dead guy.
I really can only think of 2-3 cases where the guy wasn't actually "guilty."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873176&forum_id=2...id.#49934592) |
|
|