But ACB is just a fundie Christian retard and Kavanaugh is a crying little bitch , they don’t even have to be controlled I think

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47779266)

should have stopped there

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47779268)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf

edit:

Held: Neither the individual nor the state plaintiffs have established Article III standing to seek an injunction against any defendant. Pp. 8– 29.

big fucking deal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47779267)

if i want to know what is going on in conspiracy schizo land you are the first one i'll call, but other than that you don't really have too much to offer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47779293)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47779283)

my point is that the MSM literally does not understand what the legal issues are and are not in the opinion because the MSM is filled with retarded journalists fighting a twitter flame war 24/7. not talking about whether the majority is a dogshit exercise in feminine thinking (it is) that will embolden state actors like the dissent lays out nicely

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47779323)

it's a green light for libs to use cutouts so that the federal government can censor speech.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47782099)

https://x.com/alexberenson/status/1806001539758109148?s=46&t=jKXH7m3p0jeKr--GrDZGug

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47779348)

I suppose Berenson has more evidence of government actors specifically targeting him, but his statement that this opinion "actually help[s] Berenson v. Biden" is asinine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47780823)

https://www.thefire.org/news/fire-statement-murthy-v-missouri

Below is a statement from FIRE Chief Counsel Robert Corn-Revere on today's Supreme Court ruling on Murthy v. Missouri:

The Supreme Court sidestepped deciding whether government pressure on social media platforms violates the First Amendment. But just a few weeks ago, it unanimously reaffirmed a core First Amendment principle: The government can’t censor by private coercion any more than it can by public legislation.

Despite reams of evidence documenting government pressure, the court held today these plaintiffs lacked standing to sue. FIRE is concerned about what this means for future First Amendment plaintiffs. But the majority opinion notes courts have the power to stop government attempts to pressure social media platforms when proven. That’s important.

When government officials attempt to force platforms into censorship, Americans need to know. To secure transparency, Congress must take action. A little bit of sunlight would go a long way toward ending the censorship by coercion at issue here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47780640)

I'm just trying to remember exactly which among our retarded shitcon posters that was.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47781453)

Separately, did you call Rach and tell him to ban me yet? Do you need help dialing the phone?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47781664)

you people literally want to imprison librarians because you think that books are the reason we have gay people. if the government can compel companies to tell consumers that they'll die if they buy their products, it follows that the government can also compel social media companies to let their users know that ringworm pills and bleach are way better at killing retards than they are at killing covid. it makes no sense to claim that doing something is fine while at the same time claiming that merely threatening to do it somehow crosses a line. but if you still think a line was crossed, you should explain your reasoning to the guys at facebook/twitter (so that the next time this happens they won't have to depend on unaffected partisan hacks to sue on their behalf).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5545642&forum_id=2...id.#47781570)