How secure is the promise that Roth/HSA will never be taxed again?
| ,.,.,,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,,,..,.,. | 04/10/25 | | corporate veil of ignorance | 04/10/25 | | ..,,....,,.,..,,..,,...,...,,....,..., | 04/10/25 | | Mailer Daemon | 04/10/25 | | ruinous phenotype | 04/11/25 | | dont run libs the crystal wardens see you | 04/11/25 | | dan hurley's magic dragon underwear | 04/11/25 | | TSINAH eating Jimmy John's in a gay bar | 04/10/25 | | corporate veil of ignorance | 04/10/25 | | TSINAH eating Jimmy John's in a gay bar | 04/11/25 | | corporate veil of ignorance | 04/11/25 | | TSINAH eating Jimmy John's in a gay bar | 04/11/25 | | corporate veil of ignorance | 04/11/25 | | TSINAH eating Jimmy John's in a gay bar | 04/11/25 | | corporate veil of ignorance | 04/11/25 | | TSINAH eating Jimmy John's in a gay bar | 04/12/25 | | ,.,,,. | 04/10/25 | | .....,,,,,...,,,,,..,.,,,,,.,,. | 04/11/25 | | cannon | 04/11/25 | | corporate veil of ignorance | 04/11/25 | | Aspie Pickup Line | 04/14/25 | | Louis Poasteur | 04/11/25 | | BakerHostetler | 04/11/25 | | Oh, You Travel? | 04/11/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 10th, 2025 8:15 PM
Author: ,.,.,,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,,,..,.,. ( )
With prices a bit lower, tempted to convert old 401(k) to an IRA then convert it, but concerned about getting dingfagged when AOC is POTUS and argues that roth is just a giveaway to the """rich.""" Thoughts?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5708852&forum_id=2...id.#48835942) |
 |
Date: April 10th, 2025 10:19 PM
Author: ..,,....,,.,..,,..,,...,...,,....,...,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5708852&forum_id=2...id.#48836310) |
 |
Date: April 10th, 2025 10:19 PM Author: corporate veil of ignorance
“Politicians love the Roth because it generates more tax revenue now at the cost of tax revenue 30 years in the future. They don't give a fuck about tax revenue 30 years in the future because they will be retired by then.”
i would bet a huge percentage of roth contributions are made by people who exceed the traditional ira income cap, in which case the “alternative” to (a) tax revenue now with deferred cap gains tax is (b) tax revenue now with no deferral.
“Thus, the Roth is a great way to make whatever tax cut/new program that politicians want to fund seem less expensive than it actually is.”
i don’t even understand what this means.
“The minute they try to tax Roth withdrawals, the gig is up, and they will never be able to use that scam again.”
roths came about in 1997, which means that people have been contributing to them for their entire working careers are still in their 40s at the oldest. in any case, when the withdrawals really start happening in 20 or so years, a reversal of tax policy would, according to your suppositions, mean “revenue now” instead of revenue later.
“Even if President AOC did try it, she would almost certainly get slapped by SCOTUS, which is almost certain to have a conservative majority for the rest of our lifetimes.”
xo is increasingly old and scotus justices are increasingly young, but the median ages have not yet inflected. good luck with that plan.
“So I think the Roth tax advantages are pretty damn safe.”
okay!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5708852&forum_id=2...id.#48836308) |
 |
Date: April 11th, 2025 1:17 PM Author: TSINAH eating Jimmy John's in a gay bar
JFC lawyers really can't understand math, can they? The whole fucking reason that the Roth IRA (and later 401k) were invented was because they encourage people to pay taxes now rather than later. That is a very good thing if you are a politician. No politician is going to want to mess up that scam. Plus it would be extremely unpopular. I think the absolute worst-case scenario is that they go after the Peter Thiel's of the world with billions in their Roth accounts, but there is no fucking way they started taxing the average working stiff with maybe a couple hundred thousand.
As for SCOTUS, which justices will be retirement age in the next 25 years? Basically just Thomas and Alito. Probably Roberts as well, but even that's not a given. There is basically zero chance that Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, or Barrett retires by the time any poasters start cashing out their Roth accounts. To get a shitlib majority, all three would have to retire under a Democratic POTUS and a Democratic Senate. And given the overwhelming advantage that the Republicans have in the Senate right now, that is extremely unlikely. These is a slim chance of a liberal SCOTUS when poasters are nursing home age, but not when we retire.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5708852&forum_id=2...id.#48838090) |
 |
Date: April 11th, 2025 8:15 PM Author: TSINAH eating Jimmy John's in a gay bar
JFC you're stupid. At the moment where the government starts taxing Roth accounts, the Roth gimmick is done here and they will never be able to use it again. It's very unlikely that they would permanently eliminate that gimmick for a one-time source of funds.
More broadly, nobody is even talking about taxing Roth accounts. There is at least some discussion about a wealth tax on the taxable assets of the ultra-wealthy, but even that went absolutely nowhere when the Democrats had complete control of Washington under Biden. The idea that the Democrats would go after the tax-free assets of the middle class rather than the taxable assets of the ultra-wealthy seems absurd.
As for the average age of SCOTUS justices, the average human has one ovary and one testicle. You missed my point entirely, which was that there is zero chance that three of the conservative SCOTUS justices retire in the next 20-30 years barring serious illness. The only way you get a liberal SCOTUS is all three of the age 70+ conservatives retire under a Democratic president with a Democratic Congress. The chances of that happening are almost nil.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5708852&forum_id=2...id.#48839310) |
 |
Date: April 11th, 2025 8:24 PM Author: corporate veil of ignorance
a core part of your thesis is that pols love roths because pols’ low time preference incentivizes them to book revenue immediately rather than later. why does the opposite suddenly apply when it comes to preserving the viability of the roth vehicle?
the scotus thing is irrelevant, although you are being obtuse about it. it doesn’t have to be a direct tax on income.
i sincerely wish i had your optimism, but you are setting yourself up for a disappointing next few decades.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5708852&forum_id=2...id.#48839321) |
Date: April 11th, 2025 1:24 PM
Author: .....,,,,,...,,,,,..,.,,,,,.,,.
PRESIDENT OCASIO-CORTEZ SIGNS HISTORIC “REINVESTMENT AND REPAIR FOR EQUITY ACT” INTO LAW
Washington, D.C. – Today, President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez signed the Reinvestment and Repair for Equity Act of 2040, landmark legislation that enacts a nationwide racial reparations program funded through modest taxes on Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and Roth Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs).
Flanked by Vice President Maxwell Frost and Treasury Secretary Ilhan Omar, President Ocasio-Cortez declared, “Today we take a meaningful step toward repairing the generational damage caused by centuries of systemic injustice. True justice means more than apologies—it means investment.”
The new law implements a progressive surtax on annual contributions to HSAs and Roth IRAs for individuals in the top 30% income bracket. Additionally, dormant accounts with over $250,000 in untapped assets will incur a 2.5% annual “equity reinvestment fee,” redirected to fund the Reparations Trust.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5708852&forum_id=2...id.#48838118) |
|
|