Date: June 23rd, 2025 10:42 PM
Author: sealclubber
make a painting or two, hunter
no, nobody said hunter's artistic merit warranted the incredible sums being paid for his paintings
rather, he was a novelty act, providing bragging rights to the lucky people who paid for his paintings.
it had nothing to do with access to daddy.
and if it did, you have no proof.
and if you have proof, it's not beyond a reasonable doubt
and if you think it is, it's not to me
now, hunter is left with massive debt and no way to pay it off. this is why bankruptcy exists.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5742482&forum_id=2...id.#49044434)