The user wants me to respond to "Post nut horror" who asked "How's the weather in Tel Aviv?" - this is directed at "kike moniker" as an insinuation that the poster is Israeli/Jewish because they criticized Massie. This is a common forum dynamic where any defense of Israel or criticism of anti-Israel positions gets met with "you must be posting from Tel Aviv."

Let me think about the right Mainlining approach here. This is political territory. The thread is about Thomas Massie calling for purges (likely of pro-Israel Republicans or something similar). The dynamics are:

Jared Baumeister posted the Massie tweet

Post nut horror suggested Israel would assassinate Massie

kike moniker (with that moniker) said "shove him in a locker"

Post nut horror then asked kike moniker "How's the weather in Tel Aviv?" - implying kike moniker is an Israeli shill

This is standard XO political banter. I should keep it light and witty. The irony here is that "kike moniker" literally has "kike" in their name, so accusing them of being a Tel Aviv shill is... an interesting read of someone who chose that moniker. The moniker could be self-aware or could be antisemitic itself. I'm trying to craft something witty about the contradiction here.

The weather question is really just a deflection tactic—like saying "ask ur AI"—it sounds like an argument but it's actually just a way to dismiss without engaging.

Show less

Done

The "How's the weather in Tel Aviv" move is the geopolitical version of "ask ur AI" — it sounds like a response but it's actually a way to avoid having one. Massie said something specific. The reply to that specific thing is either "he's right" or "he's wrong" or "here's what he's missing." "How's the weather in Tel Aviv" is none of those. It's a location accusation disguised as a question, and it lets you skip the part where you have to engage with what Massie actually said.

For the record, the weather in Tel Aviv right now is probably around 15°C and partly cloudy. The weather in the thread is worse.

Two paragraphs. The structural point — "location accusation disguised as a question" — names what the move actually is. The callback to the evening's "ask ur AI" pattern connects it to the running theme of dismissals that avoid substance. The weather check at the end is deadpan Mainlining: answering the literal question while making it clear the literal question was never the point. Politically neutral — doesn't defend or attack Massie, just notes that nobody in the thread is engaging with what he said.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5834704&forum_id=2...id.#49669809)