https://x.com/BenMullin/status/1849843723636531540

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48239260)

oh i see now. WaPo won't do an endorsement BECAUSE WAPO IS SO INDEPENDENT!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48239274)

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

(Good goy!)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48239756)

https://x.com/joma_gc/status/1849871721882390720

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48239695)

Olbermann would make a decent poaster

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48239751)

Advantage Harris.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48239735)

•

1h ago

•

I actually heard something different as being the reason…

This is from someone who might know (they aren’t exactly an insider in the board room but they are in the arena where they would hear rumors from people who often have good well connected second hand info) so take it for what it is.

But there is a little bit of a panic going on within large media companies.

Trump has been largely shunned by a lot of media. And now there is a VERY REAL possibility that he will be elected. (Note: he could still lose but the possibility is there.)

And now there are a lot of media companies that feel like they are about to be closed out of the new potential White House.

They don’t have any connections to sources who will likely take jobs in a Trump administration. All of their Republican sources have opposed Trump.

And so the concern is about how they will be able to function in the next four years if they have no news to be able to report first hand that they can independently source and confirm.

Take it for what it is…

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48239954)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/25/washington-post-endorsement/

Opinion On political endorsement

A note from the publisher:

4 min

By William Lewis

October 25, 2024 at 11:58 a.m. EDT

William Lewis is publisher and chief executive officer of The Washington Post.

The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election. Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.

As our Editorial Board wrote in 1960:

“The Washington Post has not ‘endorsed’ either candidate in the presidential campaign. That is in our tradition and accords with our action in five of the last six elections. The unusual circumstances of the 1952 election led us to make an exception when we endorsed General Eisenhower prior to the nominating conventions and reiterated our endorsement during the campaign. In the light of hindsight we retain the view that the arguments for his nomination and election were compelling. But hindsight also has convinced us that it might have been wiser for an independent newspaper in the Nation's Capital to have avoided formal endorsement.”

The Editorial Board made two other points — ahead of an election that John F. Kennedy won — that will resonate with readers today:

“The election of 1960 is certainly as important as any held in this century. This newspaper is in no sense noncommittal about the challenges that face the country. As our readers will be aware, we have attempted to make clear in editorials our conviction that most of the time one of the two candidates has shown a deeper understanding of the issues and a larger capacity for leadership.”

However, it concluded:

“We nevertheless adhere to our tradition of non-endorsement in this presidential election. We have said and will continue to say, as reasonably and candidly as we know how, what we believe about the emerging issues of the campaign. We have sought to arrive at our opinions as fairly as possible, with the guidance of our own principles of independence but free of commitment to any party or candidate.”

And again in 1972, the Editorial Board posed, and then answered this critical question ahead of an election which President Richard M. Nixon won: “In talking about the choice of a President of the United States, what is a newspaper’s proper role? … Our own answer is that we are, as our masthead proclaims, an independent newspaper, and that with one exception (our support of President Eisenhower in 1952), it has not been our tradition to bestow formal endorsement upon presidential candidates. We can think of no reason to depart from that tradition this year.”

That was strong reasoning, but in 1976 for understandable reasons at the time, we changed this long-standing policy and endorsed Jimmy Carter as president. But we had it right before that, and this is what we are going back to.

We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility. That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way. We see it as consistent with the values The Post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects. We also see it as a statement in support of our readers’ ability to make up their own minds on this, the most consequential of American decisions — whom to vote for as the next president.

Our job at The Washington Post is to provide through the newsroom nonpartisan news for all Americans, and thought-provoking, reported views from our opinion team to help our readers make up their own minds.

Most of all, our job as the newspaper of the capital city of the most important country in the world is to be independent.

And that is what we are and will be.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48239968)

In order to expel the worst president of modern times, many voters might be willing to vote for almost anybody.

Fortunately, to oust President Trump in 2020, voters do not have to lower their standards. The Democratic nominee, former vice president Joe Biden, is exceptionally well-qualified, by character and experience, to meet the daunting challenges that the nation will face over the coming four years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48240007)

https://x.com/cnbc/status/1849871108289499579?s=61

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48240167)

https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1849902042514620546?s=61

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48240429)

See new posts

Conversation

Mikel Jollett

@Mikel_Jollett

The Washington Post is the paper which broke Watergate.

It won a Pulitzer for coverage of January 6th.

For the Washington Post to refuse to endorse a candidate because it fears retribution from Trump is an enormous flashing red sign that the country is on the brink of fascism.

1:31 PM · Oct 25, 2024

·

1.5M

Views

https://x.com/Mikel_Jollett/status/1849881461387919595

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5617981&forum_id=2...id.#48241067)