Candace is incredibly 180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48049858)

has she proposed an alternative for israel or is she just positing the durr durr dead kids! card?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48050041)

Dear Ari: I'm very sorry that social media (which you Jews originally created to further mindfuck goys but are now having trouble controlling in a top-down fashion) is killing mainstream media (which you Jews have always controlled and have previously effectively used to create and propagate "The Narrative"), and as a result it is quickly becoming impossible for Israel to continue to act with impunity and do whatever the fuck it wants without suffering serious repercussions as normal people all over the world increasingly find themselves with the means to easily follow along and take notice of what's really happening over in your concentration camp.

Whoops.

Oh well, sucks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48050279)

do you really want israel to trade 1:1 with hamas? lol, of course you don't.

hamas attacked israel with malice and utter disregard for the rules of war and common understanding for how war should occur

palestinians did not rise up against their own government. they did nothing except cheer.

then the world is supposed to treat them as innocent victims? lol, yeah no.

how about you, paralegal mohammed? do you think the 10/7 attack was justified? was the way it was carried out justifiable? if you answer yes to this question, why is israel unjustified in its response?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48050449)

Also, your poast suffers from the tu quoque fallacy. You appear to be saying that if Hamas’s attack on 10/7 was unjustified, then there can be nothing wrong with the way Israel has conducted its response.

A response, by the way, which has killed tens of thousands of people to avenge a few hundred killed by Hamas (which Israel comically compares to the Holocaust - and ironically they turn out to be right when it comes to the body count).

Israel’s days of just getting away with stuff like this is rapidly coming to an end. You don’t see it yet - you are notoriously one of the dimmest bulbs on this site - but believe you me, Israel is in serious, serious trouble in the long term.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48050478)

"The (fallacious) tu quoque argument follows the template (i.e. pattern):[2]

Person A claims that statement X is true.

Person B asserts that A's actions or past claims are inconsistent with the truth of claim X.

Therefore, X is false.

As a specific example, consider the following scenario where Person A and Person B just left a store.

Person A: "You took that item without paying for it. What you did is morally wrong!"

Here, X is the statement: "Stealing from a store is morally wrong." Person A is asserting that statement X is true.

Person B: "So what? I remember when you once did the same thing. You didn't think it was wrong and neither is this."

Person B claims that Person A is a hypocrite because Person A once committed this same action.

Person B has argued that because Person A is a hypocrite, he does not have a right to pass sentences on others before judging himself."

so, i appreciate your response, but i'm not seeing how it applies to my response to paralegal mo.

you say i claim the 10/7 attack was "unjustified". i'm not saying that. i don't know what hamas intended to accomplish so i don't know if it was justified or not. what i am claiming is that the 10/7 attack was extremely vicious and outside the presently understood rules of war.

therefore, israel shouldn't be bound by the presently understood rules of war in its retaliation. hamas, through its actions, gave israel the green light to attack back in similarly vicious fashion.

you claim "a few hundred". that's not accurate. it was 12 hundred.

then you say the holocaust really only resulted in the deaths of a similar amount of jews. i'll ignore that claim as it is irrelevant for my response.

then you claim that israel's response is israel "getting away" with something, i am dim, and israel is in trouble long-term.

lol, dipshit. if you think israel is in trouble for responding as they are, then you are a fucking retard for believing they should have responded in a more measured response. and that is surely what you are suggesting. my belief is that israel is responding in a too measured way. israel should treat hamas's actions with extreme prejudice. i would have responded as if the hostages were already dead. the only use for the hostages would have been to keep hamas leadership from suffering the death penalty rather than life imprisonment. nothing more.

rewarding hostage taking results only in more hostage taking.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48050554)

Hey, look on the bright side -- at least you're not oddly MAD AS FUCKKKK about someone DARING TO CRITICIZE ISRAEL ON THE INTERNET!

Hmmmmmmmm I wonder why that could be?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48050773)

There is no "response" to you at this point other than to point out that you are a YSSFM Zionist Midwit Turbokike and snicker.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48050848)

your mo, to be fair, but what a lame mo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48050861)

Lol shut the fuck up Heeb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48053726)

really really mad

it's really bizarre-if you aren't muslim-that you get so yssf over gaza

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058038)

if the dipshit is anti-semitic

and the basis for his opinion is that

then who cares what his opinion is?

it's not based on anything worth discussing because it will not be changed and he won't contribute anything insightful to the discussion.

rather, the conversation must shift to why one should be anti-semitic and base his opinions on that preliminary basis

tldr: you're dumb; he's dumb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058997)

Cr everyone in the world is a retard except for 1. You, 2. Israelis, and 3. People who love Jews/Israelis. Everyone else is just a dumbfuck idiot retard. (But PS: You’re totally not MAF about this topic or anything, and you’re also definitely not Jewish yourself.)

Got it!

Lmao Ari

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48059051)

nothing substantive.

easily the most overrated poster in board history.

not the worst even if you are lame, but the most overrated.

you don't contribute anything worthwhile except snark. wow. clever.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48059064)

yes god yes it was justifiable and i wish every single one of you kikes was killed

> if you answer yes to this question, why is israel unjustified in its response?

because "israel" is not a real thing it's a cancer on the world paid for by ugly disgusting people all of whom need to be gassed and the american taxpayer, hth

the whole system has been designed to hold up this repellent repulsive regime and the whole thing needs to be dismantled

thanks to jews like you there isn't anything left saving in america so the whole thing must come down

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48053773)

your hatred makes you stupid makes you hate

keep supporting hamas and you will continue to support the death of hamas and by extension the death of more palestinians, some of whom might actually be innocent

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058028)

all dead in gaza are presumed to be the responsibility of hamas until properly rebutted. so far, that results in zero being rebutted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48063360)

you absolutely cannot be a goy. if you are, you're even dumber than people on here say you are (which is real, real dumb). but i don't see it. you are, in fact, a kike.

as such, go climb in an oven.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48063374)

durr durr durr you're jewish! jews bad! fuck israel! durr durr durr

and nothing else

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48063457)

you didn't poast at all yesterday did you?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48063460)

strap in, Hershel. shit is going to look REALLY bad for you and your "people" in about 10 years, maybe sooner. best of luck!

you're too stupid to see this, but israel's leadership is well aware of it and they are completely panicking. it's 180.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48063464)

score over last year 40,000 to 1,300

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48063488)

playing into this narrative of caring one way or another is SPS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48053761)

withdrawing into isolationism projects to a far worse outcome for the us than not

which is not saying we need to be everywhere and worry about everything.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058060)

(2) Has Wyatt ever confirmed that Shmuley was the inspiration for The Happy Merchant?

(3) Would you faggots please quit getting into subthread arguments with fucking sealclubber.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48053796)

(2) shmuley is an actor

(3) fair

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058071)

Sure thing, but first before I do that, do you mind giving us an official count of how many innocent kids (definition so you don’t try to squirm around here like a kikey little faggot: “biological children who don’t exercise meaningful agency over their own lives and therefore should not be morally blamed for anything to a point that would morally justify their individual deaths on retributive grounds”) you concede have been killed ad a result of actions undertaken by members of the Israeli armed forces within Gaza in the last 10 months? Tyia!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058720)

if you choose to make an exception and answer on his behalf, good. go for it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058740)

Oh wow, a radical Zionist pro-Israel dickrider who refuses to answer questions about this topic due to, uh, “principles” that surely have nothing to do with the topic or the answer. Wow I have never seen this before!

Lol you faggot kike piece of shit.

PS: The whole world is watching you people now. Good luck with that!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058742)

you have proven yourself to be a lying cunt. so live with it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058746)

Lol ok man well I guess you got me good here. I have no response I’m dun and you’re not going to answer my question.

Anyway having fun answering the questions below posed by other people who aren’t notorious liars like me and who actually did answer your question first! That’ll really be the coup de grace here which proves that you really weren’t just trying to dodge my question. ;)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058808)

answer my question first, cunt

i know you won't, cunt

but it gives me an excuse to call you a cunt again, cunt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058999)

Ok, I answered the question. Can you answer TBF’s question now? Pretend I asked it, because I’m adopting it as my own. Ty.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058745)

give it a number

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058753)

It sounds like you know a lot more about this though, which is why I’m asking you my adopted question.

Your turn.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058791)

"

ReplyFavorite

Date: September 6th, 2024 9:28 PM

Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded)

To be fair,

Sure thing, but first before I do that, do you mind giving us an official count of how many innocent kids (definition so you don’t try to squirm around here like a kikey little faggot: “biological children who don’t exercise meaningful agency over their own lives and therefore should not be morally blamed for anything to a point that would morally justify their individual deaths on retributive grounds”) you concede have been killed ad a result of actions undertaken by members of the Israeli armed forces within Gaza in the last 10 months? "

my answer is--the question is meaningless unless we are referring to children intentionally killed by israel for no purpose other than to kill innocents.

if we are referring to those the answer, as far as i know, is zero

i'm not going to count any actual innocents who were killed by israel when israel legitimately was trying to kill hamas terrorists and were relying upon reasonably accurate information that their strikes were going to take out hamas terrorists

why? because if hamas were hiding amongst innocents like cowardly scum, then the deaths of those innocents is entirely their fault and responsibility

then it follows that the innocent adults of gaza should rebel against their hamas leaders because hamas is acting in a way contrary to the best interests of those who they govern

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48059012)

*Ratfaced IDF soldier barely repressing a shit-eating grin and forcing himself to cry crocodile tears as he slowly slits the throat of a small screaming Gazan child*

“YOU ANTISEMITES MADE ME DO THIS!!! I’LL NEVER FORGIVE YOU SICK FUCKS FOR FORCING ME TO KILL THIS CHILD!!!”

It’s all so tiresome, and we all know how this ultimately ends (ovens).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48059043)

LMAO

…but anyway, thanks for buckling and answering my question after insisting you absolutely wouldn’t, you dumb fuck kike. Dance, puppet! ;)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48059033)

who still hasn't contributed anything substantive

as always

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48059076)

NARRATOR: “And sealclubber was never seen in that thread again.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058824)

Haha yeah, haha!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058842)

Lol kike sit down for this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058728)

I don't like Israel bombing Gaza.. but I just don't like religious fruit cakes like Candace Owens becoming powerful cuz they might have power over me because they're fucking crazy whack job religious

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48058739)

unfortunately, lib's have said these laws are 'racist' because for some reason that's difficult to figure out, it's somehow black people who would be locked up for extremely long times if laws against 'switches' and such were enforced.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5588890&forum_id=2...id.#48063594)