\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

"Claude, analyze the data in terms of my theory" = best way to get AI PSYCHOSIS

instead, tell the model to assume your theory is false and e...
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26
You just read my long response to chilmata
TurboGrafx-67
  07/11/26
it was partly inspired by that, yes, thank you. but it's als...
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26
None of those people care about objectivity or knowledge tho...
top performing employee working 3 hour days
  07/11/26
lol cr. this poast is just for people who genuinely want to ...
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26
I almost always have it give the strongest cases for and aga...
top performing employee working 3 hour days
  07/11/26
cr. I'd say like 80% of the time I'm asking the bot to argue...
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26
and then a good exploratory question that doesn't go into se...
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26
...
top performing employee working 3 hour days
  07/11/26
If you tell it to be a neutral reviewer it is the most accur...
The Penis
  07/11/26
oh yeah true if you tell it to be hostile or argumentative s...
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26
It usually surfaces some real weaknesses, but will also make...
The Penis
  07/11/26
mfcr
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26
Yeah I usually give it a NARRATIVE about how I want the most...
top performing employee working 3 hour days
  07/11/26
If it's something social/political you certainly can't trust...
The Penis
  07/11/26
yeah they're virtually unusable now for most political Qs im...
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26
Yeah I think the expert-driven rhlf approach is clearly maki...
The Penis
  07/11/26
exactly. it's 120
fuck her right in the pussy
  07/11/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:29 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

instead, tell the model to assume your theory is false and explain the data without it. or present the best case for your theory and ask it to do its best to break it, and use its criticisms to improve your idea. if you just ask the chatbots to reinforce your existing idea, you'll end up in an echo chamber on a fast path to LLM-INDUCED PSYCHOSIS.

I'm not saying you can NEVER give the instruction in the thread title. that is a valid way of exploring an idea. but it should be used sparingly and not as a constructive step so much as an exploratory one.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993153)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:31 PM
Author: TurboGrafx-67

You just read my long response to chilmata

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993156)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:32 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

it was partly inspired by that, yes, thank you. but it's also just generally true and obvious.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993159)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:33 PM
Author: top performing employee working 3 hour days

None of those people care about objectivity or knowledge though they're just shut-in pathologically narcissistic consuela clones who want to masturbate to the computer spitting more coherent versions of their own self-serving delusions back at them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993160)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:34 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

lol cr. this poast is just for people who genuinely want to use AI to explore ideas and are open to PUSHBACK not just REACHAROUNDS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993164)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:37 PM
Author: top performing employee working 3 hour days

I almost always have it give the strongest cases for and against whatever I want to figure out (if applicable to that particular thing)

From there I can isolate what the best arguments/points actually are and then examine them individually with the LLM to figure out the cr take

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993173)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:38 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

cr. I'd say like 80% of the time I'm asking the bot to argue against my ideas and 20% I'm asking it to help me argue for them. but the breakdown doesn't matter as long as you are actively seeking PUSHBACK

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993177)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:41 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

and then a good exploratory question that doesn't go into self-reinforcing fantasyland is, "if my idea is true, what outstanding problems/anomalies would it resolve/explain?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993182)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:44 PM
Author: top performing employee working 3 hour days



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993187)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:44 PM
Author: The Penis

If you tell it to be a neutral reviewer it is the most accurate imo. At least with Fable now. I’ll tell Fable to be a hostile anonymous reviewer who thinks I’m wrong and presents the strongest coherent case against me and it will surface a couple important things I hadn’t noticed, but it also makes all kind of reasoning errors in order to force its conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993189)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:51 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

oh yeah true if you tell it to be hostile or argumentative sometimes it just comes up with shitty arguments

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993200)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:52 PM
Author: The Penis

It usually surfaces some real weaknesses, but will also make reasoning and factual errors to try to force the most hostile position against what you are saying. So it is useful I think to do a couple adversarial passes like that but not infinite. If you keep doing it you will probably just end up drifting from your original position or inserting too much hedging language in whatever you are writing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993202)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:54 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

mfcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993204)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 4:55 PM
Author: top performing employee working 3 hour days

Yeah I usually give it a NARRATIVE about how I want the most UNBIASED information possible

These days I don't really ask LLMs about anything "controversial" though. They've fucked with post-training "alignment" so much that I just don't trust them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993207)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 5:02 PM
Author: The Penis

If it's something social/political you certainly can't trust it that's for sure.

For controversial/heterodox opinions in academic subjects, iirc their stated alignment objections say they want it to default to institutional consensus and orthodoxy. Which I think is reasonable in hard math and sciences, but not so much for other things.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993220)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 5:03 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

yeah they're virtually unusable now for most political Qs imho

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993223)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 5:07 PM
Author: The Penis

Yeah I think the expert-driven rhlf approach is clearly making it get better at coding and engineering. But lol at the idea that it is getting better at other things. They are just overfitting it to consensus human-generated slop on any topic that contains a lot of uncertainty and nuance

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993233)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 11th, 2026 5:19 PM
Author: fuck her right in the pussy

exactly. it's 120

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881812&forum_id=2...id.#49993261)