Fuck this fat fucking faggot.

It's a miracle this shitspecies pulled this off

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6ihVeEoUdo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5684596&forum_id=2...id.#48685794)

Based on current technological advancements, we are likely to detect strong evidence of extraterrestrial life within the next 15–30 years—possibly by 2040. However, absolute confirmation (such as microbial life or biosignatures that leave no doubt) might take longer and depend on breakthroughs in direct imaging, in-situ probes, or even interstellar missions.

Why 15–30 Years?

🔬 1. Near-Term Possibilities (2025–2035) – JWST, ELT, and Atmospheric Biosignatures

James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is already analyzing exoplanet atmospheres and could detect biosignature gases (oxygen, methane, CO₂ imbalance).

Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) (late 2020s) will directly image rocky exoplanets and analyze atmospheres of nearby candidates like those in Alpha Centauri or TRAPPIST-1.

If JWST or ELT detects a strong methane-oxygen signature inconsistent with abiotic processes, it would be circumstantial but compelling evidence of life.

🚀 2. Medium-Term (2035–2045) – Direct Imaging and New Missions

The Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) (NASA, 2040s) will directly image exoplanets and could detect surface features, clouds, or seasonal changes—strong signs of habitability.

The Life Finder Telescope (LUVOIR-like concepts) may improve detection of bio-gases and even detect photosynthesis-like reflections from exoplanet surfaces.

If we find atmospheric disequilibrium (high oxygen + methane + ozone) in an Earth-sized planet’s atmosphere, it could be considered "strong evidence" of biological activity.

🛸 3. Long-Term (2045–2055) – In-Situ Exploration or Biosignature Confirmation

Missions like Breakthrough Starshot (mini-probes to Alpha Centauri) could send direct in-situ data from Proxima b (if it proves habitable).

Future space telescopes (50m+ aperture, exo-Earth imaging missions) could provide direct, undeniable evidence of life by detecting forests, plankton blooms, or even alien technology.

Most Likely First Discovery

✔ By ~2035: We may detect a convincing atmospheric biosignature (e.g., methane-oxygen imbalance) using JWST, ELT, or HWO.

✔ By ~2045: We may have direct imaging of a habitable world, showing clouds, surface features, or seasons indicative of life.

✔ By ~2055+: If confirmed, we might even get direct in-situ evidence of microbial life from probes.

Biggest Variables Affecting This Timeline

Abiotic False Positives: Some biosignature gases (like methane) can be produced without life. Distinguishing biological vs. geological sources is difficult.

Instrument Sensitivity: JWST is great, but larger space telescopes (like LUVOIR-class observatories) will be needed for unambiguous biosignatures.

Breakthroughs in Direct Imaging: If future telescopes like HWO or a 50m-class telescope succeed in directly imaging exoplanets, the timeline could accelerate.

Interstellar Probes: If Breakthrough Starshot or a similar mission actually reaches Proxima b, it could provide direct evidence decades sooner than waiting for next-gen telescopes.

Final Verdict:

📅 Optimistic: 2035 (biosignature detection)

📅 Realistic: 2040s (strong evidence, possibly confirmation)

📅 Conservative: 2055+ (definitive, in-situ evidence of life)

🚀 If I had to bet, I'd say: By 2040, we’ll have a biosignature so strong that most scientists consider it almost certain—but definitive, undeniable proof (like microbial fossils or atmospheric imaging of alien plants) may take longer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5684596&forum_id=2...id.#48685858)

Our celestial bodies need some privacy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5684596&forum_id=2...id.#48687025)