The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Want RIGOR? Define a STAR ALGEBRA that ensures c-algebraic structure
| fluid | 03/09/25 |
| UN peacekeeper | 03/09/25 |
| fluid | 03/09/25 |
| ,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,....:.,:.::,., | 03/09/25 |
| metaphysical certitude | 03/09/25 |
| fluid | 03/09/25 |
| metaphysical certitude | 03/09/25 |
| fluid | 03/09/25 |
| UN peacekeeper | 03/09/25 |
| fluid | 03/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 9th, 2025 2:09 PM Author: fluid And define self-adjointedness constraints and then maybe we will talk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5691361&forum_id=2...id.#48730484) |
Date: March 9th, 2025 2:11 PM Author: UN peacekeeper Later (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5691361&forum_id=2...id.#48730492) |
 |
Date: March 9th, 2025 2:15 PM Author: fluid As long as you ensure WELL-POSEDNESS I’m sure that’s fine but there better be RIGOR (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5691361&forum_id=2...id.#48730503) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2025 2:16 PM Author: ,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,....:.,:.::,., this is a lib arts board, faggot. calculatorcels gtfo. |
|
Date: March 9th, 2025 2:18 PM Author: metaphysical certitude A star algebra ensuring a C-algebraic structure* is a complex algebra with an involution ∗ and a norm making it a complete Banach space, where |a^* a\| = \|a\|^2\|a^* a\| = \|a\|^2 holds. Self-adjointness constrains elements ( a ) to satisfy a∗=a, leading to real spectra and compatibility with the norm and algebraic operations in a way that mirrors Hermitian operators or real-valued functions.
|
|
Date: March 9th, 2025 2:23 PM Author: fluid Ah but usually the physical generators of a LIE ALGEBRA are ANTI-Hermitian, at least if we want unitary exponentiation so don’t forget to clarify sign convention if you want full rigor. Now get on that 50 pages of donkey work proofs and maybe, just maybe we will accept it into our journal. But only if the right people accept the RIGOR. Better not throw in any of that airy fairy poetic French math either. We don’t need another Mandelbrot around here, this is Anglo-American RIGOR not continental fluff (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5691361&forum_id=2...id.#48730524) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2025 2:27 PM Author: metaphysical certitude That answer was from grok. Whatever you're talking about is obsolete. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5691361&forum_id=2...id.#48730540) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2025 2:28 PM Author: fluid Yeah probably. I’m getting old and I don’t remember shit anyway (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5691361&forum_id=2...id.#48730547) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2025 3:21 PM Author: UN peacekeeper You mean bourbaki? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5691361&forum_id=2...id.#48730690) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2025 8:10 PM Author: fluid To be fair I think 100 pages of donkey work and systematic rigorous formalism is gay as fuck anglosphere flame so fuck bourbaki although I guess your point is that the French had rigor too. Math is an art. Synesthetes pull stuff from the noosphere and others canonize it and prove it later when they find it useful. Math is a branch of metaphysics and so is theoretical physics. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5691361&forum_id=2...id.#48731559) |