XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 07/04/25 | | STEPHEN MILLER | 07/04/25 | | Pierbattista Pizzaballa | 07/04/25 | | Trump Tariffs Can Do No Wrong | 07/04/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 07/04/25 | | samoth | 07/04/25 | | STEPHEN MILLER | 07/04/25 | | samoth | 07/04/25 | | STEPHEN MILLER | 07/04/25 | | samoth | 07/04/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: samoth
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: samoth
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49072579) |
|
|