But I understand why you’d want to deflect from your idiocy 😂

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863761)

Or that Fauci helped fund gain of function research of coronaviruses in said lab false?

Or that vaccines were not safe and effective and prevented transmission?

Or that masks didn't work?

Or that the FBI did wiretap the Trump campaign?

Of that the FBI literally lied to courts to get said wiretap?

I could go on

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863763)

What do you think the rich family buying a home with cons’ money obtained through a lawsuit against cons for con conspiracy theories proves?

Be specific :-)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863797)

It has not been disproven that Seth Rich was the leaker behind the DNC "hack" and to assert otherwise is nonsense. You may think it is far-fetched, but is it any more so that Epstein killing himself in prison with both security guards sleeping and the cameras off?

If and when the FBI releases its files and allows us to look at them, I will reconsider. However, until that happens I choose not to trust the agency that bent over backwards and literally helped Hillary Clinton cover up crimes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863800)

Why’d you post with breathless excitement about some emails from random con retards discussing conspiracy theories about Seth rich?

Why are you so gullible?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863809)

I like to get you riled up sometimes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863812)

Please explain why it is so far fetched to think the powers that be offed Seth Rich?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863832)

1. Rich had intimate access to the "hacked" DNC files via his job

2. Death ruled as homicide from attempted robbery but nothing was taken from him

3. Wikileaks put out a reward for information about Rich just before publishing the leak

4. The Clintons have a long, sordid history of murdering people that cross them

5. DNC / Podesta refused to let FBI look at DNC server post-"hack"

6. FBI refuses to release information and oddly wants to block release for 66.6 years

The above is enough to credibly ask questions

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863892)

6 is especially amusing since you were just poasting about the FBI releasing information. Short memory little drake?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863934)

3. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/will-julian-assange-and-wikileaks-finally-tell-the-truth-about-seth-rich-918946/

In August 2016, Assange gave a TV interview with a Dutch TV program. WikiLeaks had published thousands of stolen DNC emails, throwing the presidential race into chaos and leading to the resignations of top officials at the Democratic National Committee, including Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.).

In the Dutch TV interview, Assange demurred on how he obtained the DNC emails, then dropped a tantalizing hint. “There’s a 27-year-old who works for the DNC who was shot in the back, murdered, just a few weeks ago, for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.”

“That was just a robbery, I believe, wasn’t it?” the host interjected.

“No,” Assange said. “There’s no finding.”

“What are you suggesting?”

“I’m suggesting that our sources take risks,” Assange said, “and they become concerned to see things occurring like that.”

Assange never said Rich’s name, but the implication was obvious: Rich was his source. WikiLeaks then announced a $20,000 reward on Twitter for information about Rich’s murder.

4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Body_Count

6. https://www.theepochtimes.com/fbi-asks-court-for-66-years-to-release-information-from-seth-richs-computer_4826785.html

FOIA got some emails. Those are separate from the information at heart of this discussion. But you'd know that if you were as intelligent as you say you are

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863989)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Seth_Rich

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863723)

Seth rich family: sues cons for conspiracy theories

Cons: forced to pay up as penance for their sins.

Seth rich family: buys house with cons’ money

Cons: “see! We were right!”

Absolutely amazing how stupid you people are. I mean I knew you were dumb before but holy shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4851532&forum_id=2...id.#45863757)