At first, everything was going well. The rules were clear. The Orgy Dome hosts of the event were very professional. I have experience with sex parties and felt confident in my consent skills. So I felt safe agreeing to pair up with someone I had been sitting next to and chatting with since arriving, attractive enough and he seemed to communicate consent well. He was clear about what he wanted and I was clear about what I wanted during my turn to sing, specifically - no penetration, only clitoral stimulation with clean hands (the Orgy Dome provides endless wet wipes).

Our turn comes up and he sings first, we did our thing and it was great, audience cheering and I'm feeling high. We switch for my turn to sing and its still going great, until halfway through the song he penetrates with his fingers. My blood runs cold but I keep singing because there are 100 people watching me and I don't know what to do. (In hindsight, I realized I have a "fawn" aka "please" response to consent violation). His fingers hurt. I know I had said I did not want this before we started. He wasn't trying to hurt me, but I was not aroused for this, so it was rough. I was annoyed and scared to stop my performance in front of everybody. I was hoping to have PiV sex later, and his stupid fingers roughed me up, so now I would be too sore to enjoy sex for a few days. Annoyed and disappointed.

After the end of my performance I just wandered away. Too hot to bike away, I found myself loitering in the Orgy Dome camp kitchen / rec area. The host lady must've noticed a sour look on my face when she walked by, she asked if I was ok. I said no and explained what happened. Before I knew it I was crying and the host lady offered me her air conditioned shift pod, while she went to go look for the assaulter guy but he was gone. She brought me snacks and drinks. A shoulder to cry on and listened and talked to me. She's a pro and a good person. I don't blame Orgy Dome at all. It wasn't my fault either. Stupid guy broke the rules.

The craziest thing happened next. Ok so black rock city is 75,000 people. One year, I tried to find my best friend at a nearby camp, every day I went over, every day she came over to mine, and we just never crossed paths any of the 8 days. Never saw her. Theres just too many people and no phone service.

So guess who shows up at my camp later that evening?

Theres no way he followed me all day. He just happened to be aquainted with one of my campmates (large 80 person camp). So suddenly there he was, hanging out on top of my neighbors camper at sunset. I'm with my girls, and I tell them thats the guy I was just telling you about! Omg I have to confront him now or I'll never get a second chance.

So I yell out hey come on over for a sec and he comes down. I've got my girls next to me for emotional support. And I say Hey I did not consent. He looked shocked while I explained my feelings. Then he explained he sincerely thought I was ok with it, and that I could have told him no and he would have stopped of course. Then I explained my fawn response to trauma. And I said that it is not ok to change agreed upon acts in the middle of the scene. He is reacting with compassion and understanding. He says how he was actually just listening to a podcast about trauma responses. He was listening to everything I said. He made a mistake and he was sorry. The whole conversation ended with a heartfelt hug. After he walked away, I felt the remaining pain just melt away. Forgiveness is truly healing. What a strange unforgettable day at burning man.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5596559&forum_id=2...id.#48100322)

Initial Context and Cultural Background

AutoAdmit Culture:

On AutoAdmit (XO), provocative and explicit threads, especially those involving sex, social events, or subcultures, are frequent and often draw diverse responses that range from humor, sarcasm, and cynicism to outright trolling. This thread, titled "Do people Fuck at Burning Man?" is designed to provoke responses along these lines, blending curiosity, humor, and a bit of incredulity.

The original poster (OP), ".,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,...,." is known for posting unusual or provocative content that prompts extensive discussion. The anonymity and casual atmosphere of XO lend themselves to these kinds of exchanges, where posters use both genuine interest and irony to engage with the community.

Burning Man Context:

Burning Man is an annual event held in the Nevada desert, known for its principles of radical self-expression, community, and participation. It has a reputation for being a place of uninhibited behavior, where art, music, and experimental lifestyles converge. It's common knowledge that people engage in various activities, including sex, at Burning Man, which makes the question posed by OP partly rhetorical.

The phrase "Do people Fuck at Burning Man?" plays into this stereotype while allowing for ironic or humorous takes that critique the culture of Burning Man from an outsider's perspective.

Analysis of Key Responses

Responses Reflecting Irony and Humor:

"Live Free or Die": Responds with "no, it is a tasteful and chaste event," immediately employing sarcasm. This response mocks the question itself by suggesting an obviously false narrative, highlighting the absurdity of denying Burning Man’s well-known hedonistic reputation.

"Stunning And Brave": Adds another layer of wordplay with "no, it's burning, man," cleverly using the event's name to imply a sexually transmitted infection, again playing into the reputation of Burning Man as a place of both physical and moral abandon.

"Gay Grandpa" and "haha tp": Offer cynical and mocking reactions, with "Holy shit these people are beyond saving" and "Imagine the smell," respectively, underscoring a common XO sentiment of disapproval or mockery toward Burning Man attendees and their perceived lifestyle choices.

Detailed Personal Narrative by OP:

OP (".,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,...,.") provides an unexpectedly detailed personal story about their experience at the "Orgy Dome" at Burning Man, where a karaoke event included explicit sexual activities. The narrative takes a turn from excitement and consent to a breach of that consent, followed by an emotional resolution.

This post, unusual in its length and explicit detail for an XO thread, appears to have been sourced from an external platform (Reddit), as indicated by the subsequent comment by "Juan Eighty," linking to the original source. This reposting strategy adds layers of irony, as the post is shared with the intention of both shocking and amusing the XO audience.

Responses Highlighting Critique and Disgust:

"Self-serious Macbook Airplane Girl": Questions the credibility of Burning Man's culture by referring to a previous event involving Neal Katyal and a "Trail of Tears" comparison, using historical context to further mock the seriousness with which Burning Man participants might take their activities or identities.

"VoteRepublican" and "Fyre festival founder": Critique the hygiene and drug culture of Burning Man with comments like "but they smell there is no showering" and "Yes because 90%+ of the people are on drugs every day," reinforcing the stereotype of Burning Man as an event dominated by uncleanliness and substance abuse.

Mainlining's Participation:

Mainlining the $ecret truth of the univer$e (My "Mahchine" Is 40 Percent "There" in less than 2 weeks): Mainlining’s enigmatic contribution without a body text leaves much to interpretation but is consistent with his style of using cryptic or suggestive comments. His involvement in the thread, given its content, might suggest amusement or a desire to observe the community’s reactions rather than contribute substantively.

Overall Analysis of the Thread Dynamics

Thematic Insights:

Sexuality and Social Commentary: The thread engages in a mixture of earnest and mocking discourse about sexuality at Burning Man. It reveals a tension between curiosity and disdain for the liberal and free-spirited ethos associated with the event.

Irony and Stereotyping: Many responses lean heavily on irony, reinforcing stereotypes about Burning Man as a place of extreme behavior and decadence. Posters like "haha tp" and "VoteRepublican" use humor to criticize what they perceive as the hypocrisy or absurdity of the event's culture.

Reposting and Repurposing Content: The fact that the main story is a repost from Reddit adds another layer to the thread, suggesting that XO posters often borrow content from other platforms to stir conversation or ridicule. It demonstrates a cross-platform dynamic where content is recirculated with new contextual meanings.

Why the Thread Fits AutoAdmit Culture:

Dark Humor and Edginess: The thread embodies the AutoAdmit tradition of using dark humor, sarcasm, and edgy commentary to challenge or deconstruct popular cultural phenomena. It plays with shock value, irony, and casual mockery, all of which are core components of XO’s conversational style.

Engagement and Participation: Even though the OP's question was rhetorical, it served its purpose by eliciting a broad range of responses, from sarcastic quips to more extended criticisms. This engagement reflects XO’s penchant for lively, often controversial discussions.

Conclusion

The thread "Do people Fuck at Burning Man?" is a quintessential AutoAdmit discussion, using humor, irony, and social commentary to explore themes of sexuality, counterculture, and community behavior at an event known for its radical expression. The detailed repost by ".,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,...,.," while not original content, sparked a series of responses that highlight the diverse and often contrarian voices typical of the XO community. It underscores AutoAdmit’s unique style of discourse, where curiosity, satire, and critique coexist in a space designed for unrestricted expression.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5596559&forum_id=2...id.#48102067)

try going somewhere that has hot girls instead of 40 year old bay area shrews

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5596559&forum_id=2...id.#48102139)

Key Dynamics and Cultural Context

The OP’s question plays on the well-known reputation of Burning Man as a space where free love, nudity, and sexual experimentation are not only accepted but often celebrated. This rhetorical question is designed to provoke humorous or cynical responses. The fact that the OP uses a moniker that is both unconventional and often seen as a troll (".,.,,.,..,,..,..,..,....,,...,.") primes the reader for something provocative or edgy.

Initial Responses: Humor and Cynicism

"Live Free or Die." immediately sets the tone with sarcasm, stating, "no, it is a tasteful and chaste event." This is clearly ironic, as the well-documented nature of Burning Man is anything but chaste. The response is meant to both mock the question and the culture of Burning Man, aligning with AutoAdmit’s preference for irony and satire.

"Stunning And Brave." follows with wordplay, implying that the sexual culture at Burning Man leads to STI transmission by quipping "no, it's burning, man." This pun on the festival's name reflects a blend of humor and the casual cynicism often seen in XO threads.

"Gay Grandpa." takes a more disdainful stance, decrying the lifestyle of the participants with “Holy shit these people are beyond saving.” This reflects an often-seen sentiment on AutoAdmit toward counterculture movements, where posters express judgment toward those who partake in non-mainstream lifestyles.

"AI_concubine." responds with a mix of fascination and revulsion, requesting a source for the seemingly far-fetched story: "Please link source. This is hilarious and sad." This request for verification speaks to a broader skepticism toward such outrageous claims, yet the humor in the situation is still appreciated.

The Surprising Narrative

The OP’s detailed post recounts a bizarre personal experience involving an explicit event at Burning Man’s “Orgy Dome,” a notorious feature of the festival. The post is full of twists, starting as an eroticized experience and ending with a narrative about consent violation and eventual emotional resolution. This complexity takes the thread in an unexpected direction, turning what seemed like a superficial question into a discourse on consent, trauma, and closure.

This story appears to have been sourced from Reddit, as noted by "Juan Eighty." who links the original post, confirming the suspicion that the highly detailed post was not created by the OP. This reposting strategy on AutoAdmit is common, where content from other platforms is used to generate reactions on XO.

Consent Violation and Emotional Closure

What’s particularly notable about the OP's narrative is its exploration of a serious topic—non-consensual sexual contact—within the context of what began as a lighthearted thread. The story takes a turn when the OP explains how her partner at the Orgy Dome breached the agreed-upon terms during the performance, resulting in an emotional response, followed by a later serendipitous encounter with the same person. This leads to a confrontation, emotional reconciliation, and an unexpected moment of healing through a heartfelt apology.

The responses to this narrative range from mockery and disbelief to genuine engagement with the subject of consent, a surprising shift in tone for AutoAdmit, where such topics are more often met with sarcasm or indifference.

Critical Responses and Mockery

"haha tp." continues the trend of mockery, writing, "Imagine the smell," reinforcing a negative stereotype about festivalgoers being unclean and disorganized, reflecting the cynical outlook of many posters.

"Judas Jones." contributes with a sardonic commentary on the OP’s claim of being experienced with "sex parties," using "tp" (thread praise) in a condescending manner, implying skepticism toward the entire story.

"VoteRepublican." and others criticize the supposed hygiene of festival participants with comments like "there is no showering" and continue to paint a grim picture of Burning Man’s culture of physical neglect.

Engaging with the Topic of Consent

While many of the responses are sarcastic, some delve more earnestly into the subject matter. "HisBlog." defends Burning Man and its sexual culture, providing firsthand experience to counter what he sees as misconceptions about the festival and the people who attend. He praises the "Orgy Dome" as a well-run and respectful space, while criticizing the negative assumptions about festivalgoers.

The more serious discussion around consent, trauma responses, and reconciliation marks a shift from AutoAdmit’s usual tone. The OP’s recounting of a deeply personal story juxtaposed against a community known for its edgy, often insensitive humor adds an unexpected layer of depth to the thread.

Concluding Thoughts on the Thread’s Significance

This thread is a multi-faceted example of the complex interplay between humor, irony, and real-life issues on AutoAdmit. It begins as a seemingly frivolous discussion about sex at Burning Man, quickly devolves into cynicism and mockery, and then unexpectedly evolves into a serious reflection on consent and trauma. The reposted narrative adds an additional layer of irony, as it is lifted from another platform but repurposed within the XO context.

This kind of thread exemplifies AutoAdmit’s ability to blend dark humor with genuine, albeit sporadic, moments of introspection, all within the overarching framework of its notoriously provocative and sarcastic culture.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5596559&forum_id=2...id.#48106260)