The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Good article about Clause 9.2 works with 7.6
| swashbuckling chest-beating twinkling uncleanness community account | 07/20/25 |
| Mind-boggling Ungodly Home | 07/20/25 |
| Sooty Corner Personal Credit Line | 07/21/25 |
| swashbuckling chest-beating twinkling uncleanness community account | 07/20/25 |
| swashbuckling chest-beating twinkling uncleanness community account | 07/21/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 20th, 2025 11:42 AM Author: swashbuckling chest-beating twinkling uncleanness community account “The 20-month feud between the Western Hemisphere’s two most powerful oil companies over the biggest offshore discovery in a generation hinged on a single clause of a contract few people have ever seen.”
https://archive.ph/Y4Qbx |
Date: July 20th, 2025 11:43 AM Author: Mind-boggling Ungodly Home 759144711186508463273 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752626&forum_id=2...id.#49116302) |
 |
Date: July 21st, 2025 10:27 AM Author: Sooty Corner Personal Credit Line (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752626&forum_id=2...id.#49118502) |
|
Date: July 20th, 2025 1:54 PM Author: swashbuckling chest-beating twinkling uncleanness community account The clause at the center of the Exxon-Chevron feud involves a preemption right in a joint operating agreement (JOA) for the Stabroek oil block in Guyana. Specifically, it gave Exxon and its partners (including CNOOC) the right of first refusal if another partner attempted to sell its interest in the oil field.
When Chevron announced its $53 billion acquisition of Hess — which includes Hess’s 30% stake in the Stabroek block — Exxon invoked this clause, arguing that it had the contractual right to match or block the sale of that stake. Chevron and Hess countered that the clause didn’t apply to corporate-level mergers, only to asset-level sales.
This disagreement triggered arbitration and nearly derailed the Chevron-Hess merger. Exxon saw the clause as essential for protecting its investment and operational control in Guyana, while Chevron viewed Exxon’s stance as a strategic move to interfere with a major acquisition. |
|
Date: July 21st, 2025 10:26 AM Author: swashbuckling chest-beating twinkling uncleanness community account (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5752626&forum_id=2...id.#49118501) |