Someone explain the IRAN situation to me; did we lose?
| Magenta garrison | 05/12/26 | | underhanded macaca | 05/12/26 | | Hot obsidian dilemma | 05/12/26 | | underhanded macaca | 05/12/26 | | Magenta garrison | 05/12/26 | | underhanded macaca | 05/14/26 | | Cerebral stage | 05/12/26 | | Magenta garrison | 05/12/26 | | underhanded macaca | 05/12/26 | | Magenta garrison | 05/13/26 | | Magenta garrison | 05/14/26 | | Cream fat ankles gas station | 05/14/26 | | 180 clear doctorate | 05/14/26 | | buff dingle berry area | 05/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 14th, 2026 12:49 PM Author: buff dingle berry area
Objectives were to remove discounted Iranian oil from the market and stress test alliances. Preventing an Iranian nuke is a legitimate goal but that didn't need a military strike. It is not a strategic goal to remove the Iranian threat. Some degree of bogeyman must be preserved in order to continue to justify the large US military presence in the region.
I don't think people understand that the real target is China. Also this was all gamed through AI and might be the first situation of this type. Clear Venezuela first, next remove China from Nigeria then then benefits of hitting Iran become clearer. The massive investments in Venezuela aren't possible with out increased oil prices. That was essential so long as prices remained only high and not record breaking. The effectiveness of the military strikes also demonstrated who as a country you should be creating security agreements with. Hint: nobody ran to China.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5866169&forum_id=2...id.#49885406) |
|
|