the popular perception of money's value changes asymmetrically
| Translucent theatre mexican | 07/03/16 | | Provocative Crackhouse | 07/03/16 | | Translucent theatre mexican | 07/04/16 | | bateful dilemma death wish | 07/04/16 | | Translucent theatre mexican | 07/04/16 | | Very Tactful Clown Place Of Business | 07/04/16 | | bateful dilemma death wish | 07/04/16 | | kink-friendly misunderstood marketing idea | 07/04/16 | | bateful dilemma death wish | 07/04/16 | | Very Tactful Clown Place Of Business | 07/04/16 | | i gave my cousin head | 08/03/25 | | kink-friendly misunderstood marketing idea | 07/04/16 | | costumed address boiling water | 07/04/16 | | Translucent theatre mexican | 07/04/16 | | embarrassed to the bone indecent cuck | 07/04/16 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 3rd, 2016 1:31 AM Author: Translucent theatre mexican
i was watching a rerun of Mary Tyler Moore, and Mary's 1973 salary of $225/week was scoffed at as being a fairly paltry wage. the joke was that Mary couldn't afford to buy a nice gift for someone on her low wage.
but then i looked it up on Inflation Calculator.gov, and the adjusted number is like $225/week in 1973 = $1,300/week in 2016.
that's not exactly a laughable 'office girl' wage that you could build a sitcom joke around nowadays.
the popular perception of the value of $225/$1,300 has changed, but not in a linear way.
in some strange way, 'a hundred bucks' still has the same psychological value that 'a hundred bucks' had in 1973.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2Reputation#30841735) |
Date: July 3rd, 2016 1:37 AM Author: Provocative Crackhouse
This coincides with our descent into 3rd world shithole status. There are serious adult men with engineering degrees and 7" cocks working 50 hours a week who randomly don't even make $1300 a week because, "fuck the American worker" plus ITE.
We're all conditioned to think that small amounts of money are a king's ransom, probably by CorpGovMedia. Like if you make $50k and live like a miser in Omaha you still can't really afford anything. You can afford to pay bills, if you're miserly maybe you can keep paying the bills for a while if you get suddenly canned by global capitalism. And you're right, people think that $100 is a lot of money in certain contexts. Like if you carry $300 in your wallet, people will think you're a criminal/mafioso. Meanwhile, a Mustang was like $1,999 back then. The only reason the working class can drive to work is because 17 year old F-150s are reliable and cost $3995.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2Reputation#30841757) |
Date: July 4th, 2016 3:43 PM Author: Translucent theatre mexican
cleaning out my mom's garage, i found a receipt for a basketball that my father bought in 1975.
the price? $49.95.
now, "$49.95" seems like exactly the price you might pay for a nice basketball in 2016. it really does. it seems like you would walk into a sporting goods store and $49.95 is *exactly* what you would expect to pay for a decent indoor basketball.
AND YET. when i punched the price into the inflation calculator, I discovered that the inflation adjusted price in 2016 dollars is -- a whopping **$223.27!!!**
how is this possible?
do you see what i mean by the asymmetry here? it's like some things inflate, while others do not. but that doesn't make sense. it's like magic.
it's a sim glitch.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2Reputation#30850947) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2016 3:51 PM Author: kink-friendly misunderstood marketing idea
yup.
i had a subscription to GamePro for years and i never got over how NeoGeo games were like $150 or whatever.
to this day i've never known a person that owned a NeoGeo. i always wanted to play one so bad. Their versions of Street Fighter and Samurai Showdown looked so fucking badass.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2Reputation#30850992) |
Date: July 4th, 2016 3:55 PM Author: embarrassed to the bone indecent cuck
The $20 gold coins with about an ounce of gold in them are worth $1,350 now. Is $100 in 1920 worth $6,750 today? You tell me.
http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/20s-homes.html
Most of this asymmetry is due to technology, offshoring and government interference in markets.
Also there is no good way to measure inflation because of this.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3273330&forum_id=2Reputation#30851020) |
|
|