\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
frisky emerald university sandwich
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
charismatic glassy heaven
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
frisky emerald university sandwich
  11/29/25
...
Azure thriller stage indirect expression
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
vermilion vivacious resort people who are hurt
  11/29/25
lol jfc
frisky emerald university sandwich
  11/29/25
...
Big-titted school cafeteria
  11/29/25
wow
chest-beating center internal respiration
  12/07/25
lmao
bearded cerebral spot stain
  12/07/25
...
Big-titted school cafeteria
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
chest-beating center internal respiration
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
Swashbuckling mad cow disease
  12/07/25
Mental illness
garnet submissive station
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
cerise stag film cuck
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
.,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.:..:.
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
Patel Philippe
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
,.,....,..,.,.,,,,..,..,.,..,.,.,.,...
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: frisky emerald university sandwich

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: charismatic glassy heaven

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: frisky emerald university sandwich

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: Azure thriller stage indirect expression



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: vermilion vivacious resort people who are hurt

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: frisky emerald university sandwich

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: Big-titted school cafeteria



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: chest-beating center internal respiration

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: bearded cerebral spot stain

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: Big-titted school cafeteria



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: chest-beating center internal respiration

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: Swashbuckling mad cow disease

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: garnet submissive station

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: cerise stag film cuck

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: .,.,...,..,.,.,:,,:,...,:::,...,:,.,.:..:.


Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: Patel Philippe

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: ,.,....,..,.,.,,,,..,..,.,..,.,.,.,...


They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2Reputation#49527743)