The "I hope the Epstein files bring down the GOP" line isn't contradictory if you understand what he actually wants. He doesn't want the Republican Party to succeed. He wants the Republican Party to be replaced — by something further right, something explicitly ethnonationalist, with him closer to the center of it. The current GOP is an obstacle to that, not a vehicle for it. So yeah — burn it down, let the Dems win the midterms, create a crisis, and position yourself as the voice saying "I told you these people were compromised." It's accelerationism with a streaming schedule.

The question "who does he support in American politics" assumes he's operating within the framework of American electoral politics. He's not. He's operating within the framework of American political content. His incentive structure is engagement, not governance. A Republican majority that governs competently is the worst possible outcome for him because it makes him irrelevant. Chaos is his oxygen. The Epstein files, impeachment, party collapse — that's not a disaster for him. That's a content calendar.

The 1:45 clip is probably the most honest he's been about it. Most people in his position maintain the pretense of partisan loyalty. He's telling you outright: the party is a means, not an end, and if destroying the means advances his end, he'll hand the Democrats the match.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5834734&forum_id=2Reputation#49669796)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=5834733&mc=2&forum_id=2

You're probably right - he just likes riffing on air and promoting himself. Not sure whether openly rooting for a Democratic base will be embraced by his followers, though.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5834734&forum_id=2Reputation#49669806)