XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/04/25 | | exciting azure senate | 07/04/25 | | Mildly Autistic Gaming Laptop Psychic | 07/04/25 | | doobsian dopamine meetinghouse | 07/04/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/04/25 | | Lavender set faggot firefighter | 07/04/25 | | exciting azure senate | 07/04/25 | | Lavender set faggot firefighter | 07/04/25 | | exciting azure senate | 07/04/25 | | Lavender set faggot firefighter | 07/04/25 | | exciting azure senate | 07/05/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/05/25 | | yapping location | 07/05/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/06/25 | | yapping location | 07/05/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/05/25 | | yapping location | 07/06/25 | | Dark Heady Corner | 07/06/25 | | passionate chapel | 07/05/25 | | Rose angry center hunting ground | 07/06/25 | | passionate chapel | 07/06/25 | | Lavender set faggot firefighter | 07/06/25 | | passionate chapel | 07/06/25 | | Lavender set faggot firefighter | 07/06/25 | | Aphrodisiac Yarmulke Wagecucks | 07/05/25 | | Adventurous area coldplay fan | 07/06/25 | | Sticky iridescent therapy | 07/05/25 | | costumed twinkling native regret | 07/06/25 | | Lavender set faggot firefighter | 07/06/25 | | Insanely Creepy Tank Site | 07/06/25 | | Lavender set faggot firefighter | 07/06/25 | | provocative onyx twinkling uncleanness volcanic crater | 07/06/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/06/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/06/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/06/25 | | Dark Heady Corner | 07/06/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/06/25 | | Rose angry center hunting ground | 07/06/25 | | beta soggy rigor voyeur | 07/06/25 | | Insanely Creepy Tank Site | 07/06/25 | | Adventurous area coldplay fan | 07/06/25 | | Lavender set faggot firefighter | 07/06/25 | | amethyst internal respiration bawdyhouse | 07/06/25 | | Sapphire private investor striped hyena | 07/06/25 | | disrespectful lodge trump supporter | 07/06/25 | | Sapphire private investor striped hyena | 07/06/25 | | thriller main people elastic band | 07/06/25 | | passionate chapel | 07/06/25 | | bearded orchestra pit philosopher-king | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Lavender set faggot firefighter
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Lavender set faggot firefighter
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Lavender set faggot firefighter
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Lavender set faggot firefighter
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: costumed twinkling native regret
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Dark Heady Corner
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Adventurous area coldplay fan
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2Reputation#49076800) |
|
|