PROTIP: use "Websters dictionary defines..." to start ur closing
| glittery hell | 04/24/15 | | sickened sandwich | 04/24/15 | | ultramarine lodge dog poop | 04/24/15 | | low-t amber school cafeteria azn | 04/24/15 | | Glassy Fiercely-loyal Mexican | 10/22/15 | | Fragrant Black National Voyeur | 10/22/15 | | Anal spruce scourge upon the earth sex offender | 10/22/15 | | blue confused piazza | 10/22/15 | | Sick startling dilemma | 10/22/15 | | Word combinations | 10/08/25 | | Idiotic organic girlfriend | 10/22/15 | | glittery hell | 05/16/16 | | electric chad stage | 05/16/16 | | glittery hell | 05/16/16 | | electric chad stage | 05/16/16 | | glittery hell | 05/16/16 | | bateful brethren field | 12/28/16 | | Hateful Cuckoldry Parlour | 12/28/16 | | Big ladyboy | 12/28/16 | | bateful brethren field | 11/11/20 | | alcoholic titillating corner | 07/26/24 | | Paralegal Adolf Hitler | 10/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 24th, 2015 2:57 PM Author: glittery hell
It has a reputation now as this hackneyed expression, which is why it WORKS. The jury always perks up because it's so unexpected. Also it frames the issue very clearly: this is the plain definition, here are the facts, the facts don't match the accusation, acquittal. I literally bring a well-worn old dictionary and thump it onto the jury railing.
Prosecutors get flustered as FUCK and end up reacting to me rather than making their own case, and it makes them look gay as hell. They smirk or scoff, which makes them look like douches. They usually take time in their own closings to say something about "the defense counsel's old tricks and theatrics" but that just reminds the jury even more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2862749&forum_id=2Reputation#27751704) |
|
|