Why is XO darling Nick Fuentes diluting his main message with dumb nonsense
| ..,,....,,.,..,,..,,...,...,,....,..., | 12/17/25 | | "'''''"'""'''"'"' | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | "'''''"'""'''"'"' | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | Darnell | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | Darnell | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | So we looked at the data | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | So we looked at the data | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | .,.,...,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,....,:,..;,.., | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | .,.,...,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,....,:,..;,.., | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | Darnell | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | Darnell | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | Darnell | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | Jewish homosexual | 12/17/25 | | Darnell | 12/17/25 | | Jewish homosexual | 12/17/25 | | lex | 12/17/25 | | nude gunner | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | nude gunner | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | nude gunner | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | nude gunner | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | nude gunner | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | nude gunner | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | nude gunner | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | Ricky | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | Ricky | 12/17/25 | | American Cattle Goy | 12/17/25 | | santa's top guy | 12/17/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 17th, 2025 11:25 AM
Author: ..,,....,,.,..,,..,,...,...,,....,...,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811331&forum_id=2Reputation#49516455) |
Date: December 17th, 2025 11:41 AM
Author: .,.,...,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,....,:,..;,..,
What’s his main message? That sex with women is gay?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811331&forum_id=2Reputation#49516500) |
 |
Date: December 17th, 2025 11:59 AM
Author: .,.,...,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,....,:,..;,..,
why is a half-Mexican with a Mexican surname saying this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811331&forum_id=2Reputation#49516552) |
 |
Date: December 17th, 2025 2:35 PM Author: nude gunner (gunneratttt)
that's not what i said at all. every one of my replies itt is either refocusing a nonresponsive rant or correcting an RC fail, so it's rich you'd accuse me of bloviating nonsensically.
grok agrees!
This thread is about Nick Fuentes. Analyze the conversation between HAtp and gunner. Is HAtp right that gunner is bloviating nonsensically?
### Analysis of the Conversation Between HAtp and Gunner
This conversation is a back-and-forth debate on the nature of internet provocateurs like Nick Fuentes, focusing on their evolution, follower devotion, and ideological consistency. Gunner initiates with a general observation about the "lifecycle" of edgelords moderating for broader appeal, while HAtp defends Fuentes' steadfastness and challenges criticisms. It escalates from conceptual discussion to personal accusations, with Gunner using HAtp's responses as evidence of infatuation, and HAtp dismissing the points as irrelevant. Below, I summarize the exchange, analyze dynamics, themes, and strategies, then address the query: Is HAtp right that Gunner is "bloviating nonsensically" (i.e., rambling irrelevantly/long-windedly), or is Gunner clear while HAtp evades?
#### Summary of the Conversation
- **Gunner (1:18 PM)**: Outlines a typical "lifecycle" for provocateurs: start edgy to build a cult, moderate for appeal, alienate originals who seek new figures.
- **HAtp (1:21 PM)**: Counters that Fuentes remains consistent ("one note for 10 years"), and his followers aren't "blind idiots."
- **Gunner (1:37 PM)**: Quotes HAtp to argue his defense shows infatuation, mocking "groyper copy-pastes."
- **HAtp (1:39 PM)**: Defends Fuentes as "right about 90%," demands arguments against his ideology.
- **Gunner (1:44 PM)**: Reiterates infatuation evidence via HAtp's segue to veneration.
- **HAtp (1:49 PM)**: Dismisses as non-gotcha ("agree with... ideologue"), repeats demand.
- **Gunner (1:54 PM)**: Clarifies no attack on views, notes "nonresponsive segue" as infatuation proof.
- **HAtp (1:58 PM)**: Reiterates dismissal, asks "what are you on about?"
- **Gunner (2:01 PM)**: Explains contesting "not blind idiots" via "infatuated" (less pejorative term).
- **HAtp (2:06 PM)**: Accuses "bloviating nonsensically," denies "blind idiot" applies broadly.
The dialogue is circular: Gunner probes meta-devotion; HAtp deflects to ideology's merits.
#### Dynamics
The dynamic is probing vs. evasive—Gunner leads with a neutral, analytical point (lifecycle as a pattern), but HAtp personalizes it (Fuentes exception), prompting Gunner to use HAtp's poasts as evidence. Gunner persists with clarifications (e.g., "nonresponsive segue," 1:54 PM; term explanation, 2:01 PM), while HAtp repeats challenges ("arguments against," 1:39 PM) and dismisses ("not a gotcha," 1:49 PM). No concessions; ends with HAtp's accusation, highlighting xo's (AutoAdmit) stalemates where meta-rhetoric trumps substance.
#### Themes
- **Devotion/Fandom**: Gunner critiques "cult like" alienation (1:18 PM); HAtp defends as principled ("he's right," 1:39 PM).
- **Identity Politics**: Implicit in HAtp's Fuentes praise ("choose your own race," prior context) vs. Gunner's "losers... scapegoats" (1:18 PM).
- **Rhetoric/Engagement**: Meta on poasting—Gunner accuses nonresponse (1:54 PM); HAtp calls "bloviating" (2:06 PM).
- **xo Contrarianism**: Debate on movements' appeal/merit amid "blackpills" (demoralizing on radicals).
#### Rhetorical Strategies
- **Probing/Repetition**: Gunner quotes/reiterates (e.g., "you're infatuated" → evidence, 1:37 PM) to build case.
- **Deflection/Dismissal**: HAtp shifts to ideology ("arguments against," 1:39 PM) and dismisses ("not a gotcha," 1:49 PM).
- **Clarification**: Gunner explains terms ( "less pejorative," 2:01 PM).
- **Accusation**: HAtp ends with "bloviating nonsensically" (2:06 PM).
#### Assessment: Is HAtp Right That Gunner Is Bloviating Nonsensically?
HAtp is **not right**—Gunner is **clear, concise, and focused**, while HAtp's "failure to comprehend" is **evasive**. Gunner's poasts are structured/short (1-3 sentences), directly addressing HAtp (e.g., quotes as evidence, 1:37 PM; clarifies non-attack, 1:54 PM; explains substitution, 2:01 PM). No bloviating (rambling/irrelevance)—each advances the infatuation point tied to HAtp's "not blind idiots" claim (1:21 PM). HAtp evades: deflects to ideology (1:39 PM ignores infatuation); repeats "not a gotcha" (1:49 PM); dismisses "what are you on about?" (1:58 PM) without rebutting. This bad-faith evasion fits xo "ranting > engaging"—HAtp prioritizes defense over discussion. Legitimate confusion would seek clarification; HAtp's shows disinterest in engaging Gunner's meta-critique.
Gunner right on non-engagement—HAtp evades to rant.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811331&forum_id=2Reputation#49517061) |
 |
Date: December 17th, 2025 2:52 PM Author: nude gunner (gunneratttt)
i included the question:
"This thread is about Nick Fuentes. Analyze the conversation between HAtp and gunner. Is HAtp right that gunner is bloviating nonsensically?"
you could throw the conversation into an LLM yourself and see the results. you frequently have trouble being responsive and end conversations with "i don't understand" or "that's bloviating nonsense." if you were actually interested in engaging and legitimately couldn't parse what's being discussed you could use an LLM or ask clarifying questions. of course you're not actually interested in engaging and just use dismissive jabs about writing as an excuse. but anyone reading this would see i'm being direct and you're deflecting -- including a robot!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811331&forum_id=2Reputation#49517107) |
 |
Date: December 17th, 2025 1:38 PM Author: American Cattle Goy (Goy First, America Always)
I love that clip. When he crashes out.
"Every day I try and prove Richard Hanania wrong that the goyim are actually smart and capable and every day my own viewers prove me wrong."
Something like that.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5811331&forum_id=2Reputation#49516873) |
|
|