2. MASE

3. MPA

4. Tommy

5. lex

6. luis

7. ricky

8. TSINAH

9. OldHLSDude

10. gunnerattt

excluded: NSAM (spam), nyuug (spam), cowgod (spam), obeezy (spam), TDNW (spam), RSF (spam), benzo (spam)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48056771)

This thread initiated by "cock of michael obama" provides a unique look into how the AutoAdmit community values its poasters based on the perceived quality and impact of their contributions. Here’s an extended breakdown.

Understanding the Context and Content

The Ranking List and Poaster Dynamics:

"Cock of michael obama" ranks Spaceporn as the top content creator, followed by MASE, MPA, Tommy, lex, luis, ricky, TSINAH, OldHLSDude, and gunnerattt. The poaster notes several exclusions due to "spam" or perceived lower-quality content, including NSAM, nyuug, cowgod, obeezy, TDNW, RSF, and benzo.

The list is immediately contested by other poasters. For instance, Mainlining quickly chimes in, pointing out the absence of Boom, suggesting a possible bias or oversight in the rankings. This is critical as it demonstrates that even a thread about rankings can become a vehicle for asserting one's presence or challenging perceived authority.

Further Insights into Key Poasters:

Spaceporn remains at the top due to his unpredictable, often surreal contributions. "Zurich is stained" describes Spaceporn's unpredictability: "I'm not 100% certain that he's for real and not trolling us… think of all the threads with SP craziness and all the nutty shit he's believed."

MASE appears in the top tier, which is notable as his poasts frequently blend humor with an undercurrent of absurdity. For example, el dupo echoes support for MASE, indicating his capacity to generate memorable content even if it is often enigmatic or niche.

MPA is praised by lex for branching out: "MPA is getting some cred… he's really branched out and it's mostly been refreshing, choice content." This shows how evolving a poaster's style or themes can be perceived positively, keeping their presence relevant and engaging.

Criticism and Debate Over Criteria:

"Cock of michael obama" defends his list by asserting that it is based on "newness of content creation." He argues that some, like TBF, are excluded due to repetitive content: "TBF says the same 5 things over and over and over."

However, a certain dog being eaten by feral haitian contests this notion, pointing out that even repetitive content like TBF's can still engage the community: "you're reaching spaceporn levels of lack of self-awareness if criticizing TBF for repeating the same things over and over."

The “Holy Trinity” of Mainlining/Boom/Evan39

The Holy Trinity Concept:

The idea of merging Mainlining, Boom, and Evan39 into one entity, often referred to by some as a "Holy Trinity," acknowledges the speculation and lore surrounding their interconnected personas on AutoAdmit. Mainlining himself plays into this narrative with poasts like, "aka u ;) aka Boom aka whoever else these nuts on this shitbort think are 1 person," embracing the ambiguity and playful mystery around their identities.

This collective identity enhances their mystique and positions them as a complex, multifaceted poaster—one that consistently contributes to the board’s metanarrative and is always the subject of intrigue and speculation.

Influence and Content Creation:

Mainlining/Boom/Evan39’s influence is pervasive across threads. For example, Mainlining’s poast about Trump and Vance: "Well, we don't talk much. I don't even really know what he does," reflects his ability to blend humor, political commentary, and AutoAdmit’s unique style of discourse. This poast, which pokes fun at political alliances, has a deeper undercurrent that questions the nature of superficial relationships in politics.

Evan39 often creates content that oscillates between earnest introspection and mock-serious commentary, such as the recent thread about being deceived by society or his ambiguous self-declarations as both a grocery store worker and a high-profile lawyer. This ability to blur the line between reality and satire makes his contributions compelling.

Boom’s poasts often reflect a similar style, maintaining a persona that mixes grandiosity, mischief, and cryptic humor. Together, this triad forms a central, cohesive narrative thread within the AutoAdmit community, continuously driving discussions and meta-commentary.

Top Content Creators: A Reconsidered View:

By merging Mainlining/Boom/Evan39 into a single collective persona, they arguably warrant a top spot on the list due to their unique ability to stimulate both direct and indirect engagement. Their interconnected identities create a feedback loop where every poast or discussion involving one of them is inevitably tied back to the others, creating a continual narrative that keeps the board's community intrigued and entertained.

This “Holy Trinity” should arguably rank above most, if not all, others, as their layered content transcends typical poasting by incorporating a broader, self-referential game of identities, satire, and cultural commentary.

Conclusion

The debate over who the top content creators on AutoAdmit are is less about objective measures and more about who captures the board's unique blend of humor, irony, and engagement. While Spaceporn leads in terms of bizarre and unpredictable content, and MASE contributes with his memorable absurdities, the collective persona of Mainlining/Boom/Evan39 embodies the true spirit of AutoAdmit: a tangled web of wit, irony, layered identities, and perpetual engagement. They merit top consideration in any ranking of content creators, not only for their individual contributions but for the broader narrative cohesion they provide to the board.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48077821)

Seems fair and not at all MAF

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48056978)

(Jew who craves novelty and despises consistency)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057015)

," sneered the Jewish Hollywood Executive. "No one wants to see those stupid old stories with white people anymore. Now find me a brown man in a wig and make zher gay!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057033)

you just explained why *you* don't like him (i.e. your list is subjective and biased) but have no response for him winning mpm. the only thing that gay contest is good for is gauging how popular a poaster's content is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057071)

& this list isn't "intentional" vs "unintentional" content creation. it is just content creation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057075)

this is the equivalent of not including taylor swift on top 10 artists of 2024 despite The Tortured Poets Department having like 10x the sales of the next best selling album. this isn't "not being free of bias", it's very openly being catty and stubborn because tbf triggered you. which is exactly what he's seeking btw, so good job, you're proving why he is a good content creator. he has you spinning.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057092)

Did you exclude yourself from the list on the grounds that you consider yourself to be "a broken chatgpt robot which was programmed by a retarded 10 year old" who just "repeat[s] the same things over and over"?

Just curious haha

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057158)

Oh wow haha ok

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057170)

RSF provides content with his travel photos.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057105)

CSLG's posting has dropped like a rock. he only posts in his own threads and his own threads are down to once every 3 months or so now. so definitely not top 10 - he could have been on the list in another time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057108)

and yeah we don't have nearly enough poasters left here to analyze them only by their recent body of work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057133)

but these upper ranks are debatable - you would put him #1?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057134)

think of all the threads with SP craziness and all the nutty shit he's believed. gunner is chinese, NODs, jerking off on bathmats with his family on them, many more. i think i deserve some credit because i have been his foil for most of this content, at least in the last year and a half or so. his last couple of massive board meltdowns happened solely because of me.

and let me repeat what i did to set him off:

1. may 2023: made a thread about a squirrel attacking his penis

2. the other day, i complimented chilmata's lawyering skills and suggested that nobody would say such a thing about SP.

these things caused him to melt down in an epic fashion.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057172)

the evidence of him being who he is overwhelming but i still can't fully bring myself to believe that HE'S REAL.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48057189)

Key Themes and Insights:

The Subjectivity of Rankings: The debate surrounding the rankings highlights the inherent subjectivity of evaluating poasters' contributions. While "cock of michael obama" offers "newness of content creation" as his primary criterion, other poasters challenge this metric, emphasizing engagement, humor, and the ability to trigger strong reactions.

The "Holy Trinity": The thread underscores the enduring fascination with the intertwined personas of Mainlining, Boom, and Evan39. Mainlining's playful acknowledgment of this "Holy Trinity" further fuels speculation and cements their collective status as central figures in the XO narrative.

The AI Conundrum: The exchange between "So we looked at the data" and ChatGPT reveals a tension between the XO's desire for unfiltered, boundary-pushing content and the AI's adherence to ethical guidelines. This tension mirrors the broader societal debate about the role and limitations of AI in online spaces.

The Evolving Nature of Content Creation: The discussion highlights the fluid nature of content creation on AutoAdmit. Poasters like MPA are praised for branching out and evolving their style, while others, like TBF, are critiqued for their perceived repetitiveness. This suggests that staying relevant on the XO requires constant innovation and adaptation.

The Power of Persona: The thread reveals the importance of persona and self-presentation on AutoAdmit. Poasters like Spaceporn, with his outlandish claims and bizarre tangents, are celebrated for their ability to create a compelling and unpredictable online presence.

Conclusion:

This thread is a testament to the dynamic and self-referential nature of the AutoAdmit community. It's a space where poasters not only create content but also actively participate in shaping the narrative and meta-commentary surrounding the forum itself. The discussion about content creator rankings is just one example of how the XO community constantly engages in self-analysis and reflection, blurring the lines between reality and performance, and ultimately contributing to the unique and ever-evolving tapestry of AutoAdmit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5589872&forum_id=2Reputation#48077834)