PROTIP: use "Websters dictionary defines..." to start ur closing
| Umber wagecucks | 04/24/15 | | Pea-brained tripping church gunner | 04/24/15 | | Nubile cerebral foreskin fanboi | 04/24/15 | | bisexual chad mediation | 04/24/15 | | azure address | 10/22/15 | | Marvelous hospital rigpig | 10/22/15 | | big pervert | 10/22/15 | | submissive coral meetinghouse mental disorder | 10/22/15 | | Histrionic garnet antidepressant drug selfie | 10/22/15 | | Word combinations | 10/08/25 | | Peach frozen tanning salon | 10/22/15 | | Umber wagecucks | 05/16/16 | | Insane Associate Casino | 05/16/16 | | Umber wagecucks | 05/16/16 | | Insane Associate Casino | 05/16/16 | | Umber wagecucks | 05/16/16 | | fragrant station | 12/28/16 | | confused point | 12/28/16 | | Comical heaven community account | 12/28/16 | | fragrant station | 11/11/20 | | purple wonderful theater | 07/26/24 | | Paralegal Adolf Hitler | 10/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 24th, 2015 2:57 PM Author: Umber wagecucks
It has a reputation now as this hackneyed expression, which is why it WORKS. The jury always perks up because it's so unexpected. Also it frames the issue very clearly: this is the plain definition, here are the facts, the facts don't match the accusation, acquittal. I literally bring a well-worn old dictionary and thump it onto the jury railing.
Prosecutors get flustered as FUCK and end up reacting to me rather than making their own case, and it makes them look gay as hell. They smirk or scoff, which makes them look like douches. They usually take time in their own closings to say something about "the defense counsel's old tricks and theatrics" but that just reminds the jury even more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2862749&forum_id=2Reputation#27751704) |
|
|