DANIEL BROU I SALUTE YOU

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#11954658)

He just has to say outloud, uprfront and proud of his closeted, lying, dishonest perception of the world:

HEY YOU. I AM NOT WRIITING A LETTER OF REC FOR YOU.

But Daniel Brou is too dishonest and closeted and circumspect and cautious and entirely invested in Joanne Yiokaris to do such a thing.

He's a liar. A conscious and unconscious liar!!!!!!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#11954874)

Daniel Brou is a Carpetbagger AcademicDaniel Brou used to have a web page at Columbia University that included links to a number of Canadian newspapers, to a progressive liberal organization, to a few progressive comic strips, and his Canadian and Columbian friends. But his website had no links to American universities, organizations, or people. His website had no links to any New York City institutions, organizations, or people. There was absolutely nothing to tell that Daniel Brou had lived for five years in New York City because apparently nothing was worth linking to. For that matter, he didn't even include a mention of his future fiancee. No pictures. No notes about her. Other Canadian friends, but his future fiancee wasn't worthy of mention. How was it that Daniel Brou could live in New York and the US for five years without being impressed by ANYTHING, A SINGLE THING? Academics like Daniel Brou come to the US without being open to new experiences, without believing in its democratic values, or its cultural marketplace, and they leave exactly as they arrive except with a shiny prestigious degree and expensive scholarships that could have gone to students that actually believed in the American educational system. If Daniel Brou was so much more confident in the Canadian educational system, then why didn't he get his PhD at a Canadian university? Carpetbagger academics like Daniel Brou don't listen to their beliefs, aren't open to new expereinces, but treat the US like a piggy bank for getting expensive prestigious degrees that they take home to train generations of new scholars who don't value the US any more than them. And why is the US educating Canada's labor force on its behalf? The externalities of Daniel Brou's American financed education are being returned to the Canadian economy, so the US is funding Canadian economic growth rather than American economic growth. If Daniel Brou loved his future fiancee, why no mention of her whatsoever? If he believed in the Canadian educational system, why did he get his phd in the US? If he lived in nyc for 5 years why is nothing worthy of mention? Why is someone so closed to new experiences, so barren of beliefs given a Teaching Award as if he is someone worthy of trust and respect???

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#11955214)

Daniel Brou: The Mommy Incentive?

Financial Incentive:

To go back a few years. The Daniel Brou said he’d write me a letter of recommendation to economics graduate discipline Elation! Joy! Celebration! I said, let’s understand this guy a little better. I offered him a financial incentive: Daniel Brou, want to be my economics tutor? Daniel Brou equivocated, hemmed, hawed, reneged. No, not interested. Okay, maybe the financial incentive wasn’t big enough. Tutoring is a low margin business. A few years pass. Other incentives have failed, so I offer a bigger financial incentive: an expensive $800 watch. Again, the Daniel Brou is silent. Super high profit margin, but again silence. Conclusion: financial incentives don’t matter to my economics professor.

Collegial Incentive:

Whatever! The Daniel Brou is still writing me a letter of recommendation; who cares about tutoring? I dutifully send the Daniel Brou the complete packet to write the letter of rec. The cover letter, thanking the professor for his assistance; the cv, showing my many accomplishments; the statement of purpose, outlining my future plans and sense of commitment; the stamped addressed envelopes, hey dude, the postage is on my dime not yours! SILENCE. Whatever! The Daniel Brou is a busy guy! I wish I could be as busy as the Daniel Brou. Don’t disturb the busy professional! I’m sure he sent the letters of recommendation that he promised to write for me! Send the Daniel Brou a thank you note and thank you gift for his work. A nice Mancur Olsen book. He can always resell the gift if he doesn’t like it.

The Appeal to Duty Incentive:

A year has passed. Still silence.“The Daniel Brou, I write, you really owe me an explanation for your silence. Did I offend you? Did someone tell you something negative about me? You won a teaching award so you must care about your students. I was one of your students, and I would appreciate some answers.” Silence. Silence. Silence. Conclusion: the appeal to a sense of teacher’s duty is ineffective with a guy who won a teaching award.

Power Play Incentive:

Several years have passed. Still don’t know what happened with the letters of recommendation. Contacted Daniel Brou again and again silence. Have I offended the Daniel Brou? Did I overstep some boundary of which I’m unaware? Did one of my detractors contact the Daniel Brou? I email and call the Daniel Brou, but the Daniel Brou’s friend hangs up on me. The emails go unanswered. Several years, yes, YEARS, pass. I’m fired from a couple jobs under suspicious circumstances…. I go to the Daniel Brou’s supervisor at Columbia: Daniel Brou hasn’t returned my messages and got me fired from a couple jobs! Daniel Brou’s supervisor: the Daniel Brou is super busy and can’t talk with you. Unless you give me direct evidence of his involvement in your firing, it’s your problem. Apparently, working within the system isn’t always effective. Conclusion: bosses really don’t care about the Daniel Brou’s performance. They give him money and don’t expect him to perform.

Mommy incentive:

Too late for the letter of recommendation. Too late for the information he might have provided. Still unanswered questions. I call Daniel Brou’s mommy. She finds out my name and hangs up the phone on me. I see a family resemblance here! The next email to Daniel Brou….. GETS A @@!!$%^ RESPONSE! YOU HEARD ME RIGHT! A RESPONSE!!!!!!! HE ANSWERED MY EMAIL!!!!!!

Not politely, obviously. But a response, nevertheless.

“Since you are contacting my family members, I have to respond,” says the Daniel Brou. He provides a superficial explanation for the aforementioned.

Conclusion:

The Daniel Brou, the PhD Columbia trained economist, isn’t motivated by financial incentives, collegial incentives, calls to teaching duty incentives, power play incentives.

But if you call up his mommy, he returns your calls.

With the Daniel Brous, call up their mommies for the best results!!!!!!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#12116782)

Daniel Brou: The Mommy Incentive?

Financial Incentive:

To go back a few years. The Daniel Brou said he’d write me a letter of recommendation to economics graduate discipline Elation! Joy! Celebration! I said, let’s understand this guy a little better. I offered him a financial incentive: Daniel Brou, want to be my economics tutor? Daniel Brou equivocated, hemmed, hawed, reneged. No, not interested. Okay, maybe the financial incentive wasn’t big enough. Tutoring is a low margin business. A few years pass. Other incentives have failed, so I offer a bigger financial incentive: an expensive $800 watch. Again, the Daniel Brou is silent. Super high profit margin, but again silence. Conclusion: financial incentives don’t matter to my economics professor.

Collegial Incentive:

Whatever! The Daniel Brou is still writing me a letter of recommendation; who cares about tutoring? I dutifully send the Daniel Brou the complete packet to write the letter of rec. The cover letter, thanking the professor for his assistance; the cv, showing my many accomplishments; the statement of purpose, outlining my future plans and sense of commitment; the stamped addressed envelopes, hey dude, the postage is on my dime not yours! SILENCE. Whatever! The Daniel Brou is a busy guy! I wish I could be as busy as the Daniel Brou. Don’t disturb the busy professional! I’m sure he sent the letters of recommendation that he promised to write for me! Send the Daniel Brou a thank you note and thank you gift for his work. A nice Mancur Olsen book. He can always resell the gift if he doesn’t like it.

The Appeal to Duty Incentive:

A year has passed. Still silence.“The Daniel Brou, I write, you really owe me an explanation for your silence. Did I offend you? Did someone tell you something negative about me? You won a teaching award so you must care about your students. I was one of your students, and I would appreciate some answers.” Silence. Silence. Silence. Conclusion: the appeal to a sense of teacher’s duty is ineffective with a guy who won a teaching award.

Power Play Incentive:

Several years have passed. Still don’t know what happened with the letters of recommendation. Contacted Daniel Brou again and again silence. Have I offended the Daniel Brou? Did I overstep some boundary of which I’m unaware? Did one of my detractors contact the Daniel Brou? I email and call the Daniel Brou, but the Daniel Brou’s friend hangs up on me. The emails go unanswered. Several years, yes, YEARS, pass. I’m fired from a couple jobs under suspicious circumstances…. I go to the Daniel Brou’s supervisor at Columbia: Daniel Brou hasn’t returned my messages and got me fired from a couple jobs! Daniel Brou’s supervisor: the Daniel Brou is super busy and can’t talk with you. Unless you give me direct evidence of his involvement in your firing, it’s your problem. Apparently, working within the system isn’t always effective. Conclusion: bosses really don’t care about the Daniel Brou’s performance. They give him money and don’t expect him to perform.

Mommy incentive:

Too late for the letter of recommendation. Too late for the information he might have provided. Still unanswered questions. I call Daniel Brou’s mommy. She finds out my name and hangs up the phone on me. I see a family resemblance here! The next email to Daniel Brou….. GETS A @@!!$%^ RESPONSE! YOU HEARD ME RIGHT! A RESPONSE!!!!!!! HE ANSWERED MY EMAIL!!!!!!

Not politely, obviously. But a response, nevertheless.

“Since you are contacting my family members, I have to respond,” says the Daniel Brou. He provides a superficial explanation for the aforementioned.

Conclusion:

The Daniel Brou, the PhD Columbia trained economist, isn’t motivated by financial incentives, collegial incentives, calls to teaching duty incentives, power play incentives.

But if you call up his mommy, he returns your calls.

With the Daniel Brous, call up their mommies for the best results!!!!!!!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#12116788)

The mistaken definition of market structure? The confusing use of different theoretical frameworks? The lack of development of the fourth chapter which is the only one to use that theoretical framework? The fact the two co authors are not mentioned on the title page? The fact that the same fourth chapter may have gotten academic credit at two different universities? How did your blind trust of Daniel Brou support him in all of this confusion?

And when Daniel Brou promised to write me a letter of recommendation, knew I thought he had written me one, and didn't respond for three years to questions about this and subsequent confusion, how did your blind trust sustain him? Did he feel confident that no matter how much he lied, no matter how many people he hurt, no matter how unprofessional he behaved, you would be there for him because you trust him blindly, uncritically, without consciousness?

Then when he couldn't remember his promise and he gave Frank Weiss a partial account of what had happened, and made it seem like I was contacting him for no reason, how did your blind trust sustain Daniel Brou when he got me illegally fired on a partial account? Neither Daniel Brou nor Frank Weiss bothered to fact check. But who needs fact checking when you have blind trust? And Teresita Ramirez wrote me a fraudulent teaching evaluation on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory? She didn't check any facts either? Why check facts or provide facts when you have blind trust, right, Joanne Yiokaris?

Then when a few mistakes and misunderstandings come to light only because I care enough to clear up a lot of confusion, is it your blind trust that sustains Daniel Brou from ever acknowledging he makes mistakes? Is it your blind trust that keeps Frank Weiss from admitting he fired me illegally on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory without checking facts? Did your blind trust sustain Teresita Ramirez when she wrote a fake teaching evaluation of my class on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory?

Fifty percent of Harvard MBAs this year took a Voluntary MBA Oath to serve the greater good, but Daniel Brou told me his mistake that cost me an application cycle, a couple grad progrmas, a couple jobs, a home, he told me "It's your problem." Is this what your deep faith in Daniel Brou produces? Cynicism? Disregard for others? Duplicity? Dishonesty? Are these the ships that your GREAT FAITH, set in motion?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/23644.html#ixzz0JrADL1S1&D

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#12116890)

The mistaken definition of market structure? The confusing use of different theoretical frameworks? The lack of development of the fourth chapter which is the only one to use that theoretical framework? The fact the two co authors are not mentioned on the title page? The fact that the same fourth chapter may have gotten academic credit at two different universities? How did your blind trust of Daniel Brou support him in all of this confusion?

And when Daniel Brou promised to write me a letter of recommendation, knew I thought he had written me one, and didn't respond for three years to questions about this and subsequent confusion, how did your blind trust sustain him? Did he feel confident that no matter how much he lied, no matter how many people he hurt, no matter how unprofessional he behaved, you would be there for him because you trust him blindly, uncritically, without consciousness?

Then when he couldn't remember his promise and he gave Frank Weiss a partial account of what had happened, and made it seem like I was contacting him for no reason, how did your blind trust sustain Daniel Brou when he got me illegally fired on a partial account? Neither Daniel Brou nor Frank Weiss bothered to fact check. But who needs fact checking when you have blind trust? And Teresita Ramirez wrote me a fraudulent teaching evaluation on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory? She didn't check any facts either? Why check facts or provide facts when you have blind trust, right, Joanne Yiokaris?

Then when a few mistakes and misunderstandings come to light only because I care enough to clear up a lot of confusion, is it your blind trust that sustains Daniel Brou from ever acknowledging he makes mistakes? Is it your blind trust that keeps Frank Weiss from admitting he fired me illegally on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory without checking facts? Did your blind trust sustain Teresita Ramirez when she wrote a fake teaching evaluation of my class on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory?

Fifty percent of Harvard MBAs this year took a Voluntary MBA Oath to serve the greater good, but Daniel Brou told me his mistake that cost me an application cycle, a couple grad progrmas, a couple jobs, a home, he told me "It's your problem." Is this what your deep faith in Daniel Brou produces? Cynicism? Disregard for others? Duplicity? Dishonesty? Are these the ships that your GREAT FAITH, set in motion?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/23644.html#ixzz0JrADL1S1&D

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#12116891)

Daniel Brou to student: What??? Your career is tanking and you actually expect me to get involved during your career ups and downs????? You're such a naive fool. This is all YOUR PROBLEM.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#12117795)

His professors at UWO encouraged Daniel Brou to go to graduate school They took a risk on him. His fiancee took a risk when he was having career ups and downs.

But when a student asked Daniel Brou to take the same leap of faith during her career ups and downs, he couldn't. Are you some sort of naive fool, Daniel Brou asked her? Do you really think I'd take a risk on someone besides myself?? Your career problems are YOUR PROBLEM!!!!!!!

The only person Daniel Brou believes in is Daniel Brou.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#12137283)

His professors at UWO encouraged Daniel Brou to go to graduate school They took a risk on him. His fiancee took a risk when he was having career ups and downs.

But when a student asked Daniel Brou to take the same leap of faith during her career ups and downs, he couldn't. Are you some sort of naive fool, Daniel Brou asked her? Do you really think I'd take a risk on someone besides myself?? Your career problems are YOUR PROBLEM!!!!!!!

The only person Daniel Brou believes in is Daniel Brou.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#12137286)

The mistaken definition of market structure? The confusing use of different theoretical frameworks? The lack of development of the fourth chapter which is the only one to use that theoretical framework? The fact the two co authors are not mentioned on the title page? The fact that the same fourth chapter may have gotten academic credit at two different universities? How did your blind trust of Daniel Brou support him in all of this confusion?

And when Daniel Brou promised to write me a letter of recommendation, knew I thought he had written me one, and didn't respond for three years to questions about this and subsequent confusion, how did your blind trust sustain him? Did he feel confident that no matter how much he lied, no matter how many people he hurt, no matter how unprofessional he behaved, you would be there for him because you trust him blindly, uncritically, without consciousness?

Then when he couldn't remember his promise and he gave Frank Weiss a partial account of what had happened, and made it seem like I was contacting him for no reason, how did your blind trust sustain Daniel Brou when he got me illegally fired on a partial account? Neither Daniel Brou nor Frank Weiss bothered to fact check. But who needs fact checking when you have blind trust? And Teresita Ramirez wrote me a fraudulent teaching evaluation on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory? She didn't check any facts either? Why check facts or provide facts when you have blind trust, right, Joanne Yiokaris?

Then when a few mistakes and misunderstandings come to light only because I care enough to clear up a lot of confusion, is it your blind trust that sustains Daniel Brou from ever acknowledging he makes mistakes? Is it your blind trust that keeps Frank Weiss from admitting he fired me illegally on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory without checking facts? Did your blind trust sustain Teresita Ramirez when she wrote a fake teaching evaluation of my class on the basis of Daniel Brou's faulty memory?

Fifty percent of Harvard MBAs this year took a Voluntary MBA Oath to serve the greater good, but Daniel Brou told me his mistake that cost me an application cycle, a couple grad progrmas, a couple jobs, a home, he told me "It's your problem." Is this what your deep faith in Daniel Brou produces? Cynicism? Disregard for others? Duplicity? Dishonesty? Are these the ships that your GREAT FAITH, set in motion?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1014995&forum_id=3#12358847)