\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Reminder: Pam Karlan is the next Obama SCOTUS nominee

ywia
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
shes actually quite smart
big-titted mint dingle berry
  02/14/12
has this ever been in honest dispute
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
if you read her work on the vra I think there are some serio...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
vra? educate me
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
voting rights act. when lib profs in the 90s started to be l...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
so fucking what if she likes gerrymandering; fucking 'origin...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
well, that's an insane analogy, but leaving that aside, and ...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
doesn't fuck dems over. what fucks dems over is an inabil...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
no I don't think you understand. let's imagine, to simplify ...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
no man, i get it; you're saying once people wise up to the f...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
no, I'm not saying that, you can't line-draw the electoral c...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
no im saying, if you can line draw the districts that in tur...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
districts don't affect electoral college results, electoral ...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
oh, then fuck it --- i have no response to your vra critique
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
yeah, the districts affect who gets elected in congress
trip hominid
  02/14/12
LOL, OWNED!
nofapping meetinghouse
  02/15/12
so smart, so uncomfirmable
trip hominid
  02/14/12
why? because liberal and/or not on the bench?
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
uh you can't have a scissor 3-way
Cruel-hearted out-of-control range
  02/14/12
karlan will be the judge of that. i mean justice HAHA
big-titted mint dingle berry
  02/14/12
well, she's certainly ugly enough to be a SCOTUS
Crawly dull house
  02/14/12
http://www.stanford.edu/group/scspi/affiliates/pix/karlan_pa...
passionate goal in life
  02/14/12
*doobs*
cowardly crackhouse background story
  02/14/12
Sup chalmers
passionate goal in life
  02/14/12
so three unmarried lesbian women on the Court
hilarious legend
  02/14/12
she'll likely be gay "married" by the time she get...
maize affirmative action menage
  02/14/12
who the fuck cares; she's a fuckton more preftigiouf than yo...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
yeah bro, laughable. LMAO. please, defend your assertion ...
maize affirmative action menage
  02/14/12
heterosexual marriages dissolve 50%+ of the time; they also ...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
that thus didn't really follow, now did it. like there are d...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
doesn't disprove my point; heterosexual marriage is not some...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
how many cocks have you sucked in your life, faggot?
maize affirmative action menage
  02/14/12
none. straight.
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
no straight person is this retardedly gung ho about gay marr...
maize affirmative action menage
  02/14/12
he's too ugly to attract gay men enough to let him give them...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
obviously the claim "there are different degrees of non...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
how does sex have anything to do with marriage? heterosex...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
yeah bro, marriage has nothing at all to do with raising kid...
maize affirmative action menage
  02/14/12
lol at you. im not sure the darwinian concept of having sex...
Yellow institution
  02/14/12
really. you're not sure? please, expound on your brilliant t...
maize affirmative action menage
  02/14/12
sex is a component of marriage, kind of central to marriage,...
trip hominid
  02/14/12
dont you get it bro? hetero marriage is an antiquated instit...
maize affirmative action menage
  02/14/12
180
contagious pit wagecucks
  02/15/12
monogamy definitely serves biological purposes and regularly...
hilarious legend
  02/15/12
She got dem tet tets
Excitant library nibblets
  02/15/12
...
pale infuriating halford
  07/26/16
is she an auto-appointee to ginsburg's seat?
Jet legal warrant
  07/28/16
...
Aggressive pontificating twinkling uncleanness
  06/22/17
Great law professor.
swollen pisswyrm codepig
  06/22/17
Huge fucking titties, even bigger than Sotomayor's.
Irradiated Orange Chapel Masturbator
  06/22/17
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&fo...
Glassy multi-colored abode
  12/04/19
...
Glassy multi-colored abode
  12/11/19


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 6:16 PM
Author: Yellow institution

ywia

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964177)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 6:18 PM
Author: big-titted mint dingle berry

shes actually quite smart

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964185)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 10:56 PM
Author: Yellow institution

has this ever been in honest dispute

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966314)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 10:57 PM
Author: trip hominid

if you read her work on the vra I think there are some serious questions about her intellectual honesty, but she's supersmart

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966327)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:04 PM
Author: Yellow institution

vra? educate me

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966416)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:09 PM
Author: trip hominid

voting rights act. when lib profs in the 90s started to be like "oh shit, drawing all these super-black districts suboptimally clusters reliable democratic voters in a few districts instead of spreading them around," she, because she's extremely committed to legally mandated minority districting, wrote some very dubious stuff claiming that it had no effect on democratic electoral chances at all.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966467)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:10 PM
Author: Yellow institution

so fucking what if she likes gerrymandering; fucking 'originalists' pick and choose history who the fuck cares if dem/liberals pick voting districts

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966487)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:19 PM
Author: trip hominid

well, that's an insane analogy, but leaving that aside, and her fondness for gerrymandering aside, the point I'm making here is just that she really warped the data to make it look like racial districting wouldn't harm the democratic party because she loves racial districting and was worried it would lose support if libs realized it fucked them over politically

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966574)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:24 PM
Author: Yellow institution

doesn't fuck dems over.

what fucks dems over is an inability to agree on central issues & a president who has inherited / exacerbated a weak economy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966617)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:28 PM
Author: trip hominid

no I don't think you understand. let's imagine, to simplify this, what would happen to obama's electoral hopes if all the black voters moved to a single state. Obama wouldn't be able to carry anywhere but that state and New England (even now, he has 39% approval rating with whites), and he'd lose massively in the electoral college. similar, though less exaggerated, things happen when linedrawers draw a few districts that maximize black population.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966669)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:30 PM
Author: Yellow institution

no man, i get it; you're saying once people wise up to the fact that democratic presidential hopes ride on line-drawing a majority of the electoral college, they'll change the districts. i'm saying people are dumb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966697)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:34 PM
Author: trip hominid

no, I'm not saying that, you can't line-draw the electoral college, it depends on state boundaries that are set in stone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966729)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:34 PM
Author: Yellow institution

no im saying, if you can line draw the districts that in turn determine outcomes, you effectively linedraw the electoral college results

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966740)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:36 PM
Author: trip hominid

districts don't affect electoral college results, electoral college votes are allocated on a winner-takes-all, statewide basis except in 2 states

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966754)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:36 PM
Author: Yellow institution

oh, then fuck it --- i have no response to your vra critique

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966759)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:38 PM
Author: trip hominid

yeah, the districts affect who gets elected in congress

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966781)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 15th, 2012 12:57 PM
Author: nofapping meetinghouse

LOL, OWNED!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19969118)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 6:20 PM
Author: trip hominid

so smart, so uncomfirmable

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964199)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:08 PM
Author: Yellow institution

why? because liberal and/or not on the bench?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966460)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 6:24 PM
Author: Cruel-hearted out-of-control range

uh you can't have a scissor 3-way

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964215)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 6:26 PM
Author: big-titted mint dingle berry

karlan will be the judge of that. i mean justice HAHA

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964220)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 6:36 PM
Author: Crawly dull house

well, she's certainly ugly enough to be a SCOTUS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964282)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:21 PM
Author: passionate goal in life

http://www.stanford.edu/group/scspi/affiliates/pix/karlan_pamela.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966596)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:24 PM
Author: cowardly crackhouse background story

*doobs*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966619)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:26 PM
Author: passionate goal in life

Sup chalmers

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966640)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 10:57 PM
Author: hilarious legend

so three unmarried lesbian women on the Court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966328)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 10:58 PM
Author: maize affirmative action menage

she'll likely be gay "married" by the time she gets the nomnomnom

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966332)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:02 PM
Author: Yellow institution

who the fuck cares; she's a fuckton more preftigiouf than you.

it's laughable that we think heterosexual marriage is somehow more legitimate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966373)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:29 PM
Author: maize affirmative action menage

yeah bro, laughable. LMAO.

please, defend your assertion that heterosexual marriage has less of a claim to legitimacy than the joke of a system you libpedos are foisting upon the country.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966676)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:31 PM
Author: Yellow institution

heterosexual marriages dissolve 50%+ of the time; they also go against human nature, since from an darwinian standpoint, monogamy is fucking stupid

thus if men want to marry other men, it's no more or less a 'natural' state of affairs, glenn beck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966708)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:39 PM
Author: trip hominid

that thus didn't really follow, now did it. like there are degrees of non-naturalness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966790)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:43 PM
Author: Yellow institution

doesn't disprove my point; heterosexual marriage is not some sort of natural, "correct" state of affairs. it's just a dominant institution that like other dominant institutions (slavery, religion, apple pie on fourth of july) can eventually lapse

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966815)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:45 PM
Author: maize affirmative action menage

how many cocks have you sucked in your life, faggot?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966829)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:48 PM
Author: Yellow institution

none. straight.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966855)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:55 PM
Author: maize affirmative action menage

no straight person is this retardedly gung ho about gay marriage. this sort of ridiculous bullshit is only spoken by militantly gay retards like yourself.

so spill it faggot: how many dicks?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966889)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:56 PM
Author: trip hominid

he's too ugly to attract gay men enough to let him give them head

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966895)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:45 PM
Author: trip hominid

obviously the claim "there are different degrees of non-naturalness" doesn't disprove your point, but you cannot reason from "hetero marriage isn't natural" to "it's no more natural than gay marriage." seems to me that:

a) marriage isn't natural, so both straight and gay marriage have x amount of non-naturalness to them, but

b) gay sex is undoubtedly less natural than straight sex, so

c) gay marriage is even less natural than straight marriage

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966832)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:48 PM
Author: Yellow institution

how does sex have anything to do with marriage?

heterosexual sex is definitely more natural. it being more natural has nothing to do with heterosexual marriage being more natural

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966854)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:50 PM
Author: maize affirmative action menage

yeah bro, marriage has nothing at all to do with raising kids. it's totally an irrelevant, outmoded institution.

you sould like a total fucking scholar. again, tell me how many dicks youve sucked you relentless faggot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966863)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:52 PM
Author: Yellow institution

lol at you. im not sure the darwinian concept of having sex and having kids implies anything about raising them in a nuclear family.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966873)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:54 PM
Author: maize affirmative action menage

really. you're not sure? please, expound on your brilliant thesis, friend. i'm sure that your analysis of this issue is razor sharp.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966884)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:51 PM
Author: trip hominid

sex is a component of marriage, kind of central to marriage, even

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966870)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 14th, 2012 11:49 PM
Author: maize affirmative action menage

dont you get it bro? hetero marriage is an antiquated institution that stupid ameriKKKans have foisted on us as a people and which we must free ourselves of. it joins other garbage human institutions like working to earn a living, not raping kids and not shitting in the street.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966861)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 15th, 2012 1:02 PM
Author: contagious pit wagecucks

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19969158)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 15th, 2012 12:03 AM
Author: hilarious legend

monogamy definitely serves biological purposes and regularly occurs in nature among certain animals

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966943)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 15th, 2012 1:00 PM
Author: Excitant library nibblets

She got dem tet tets

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19969140)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 26th, 2016 9:39 AM
Author: pale infuriating halford



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#31032374)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 28th, 2016 2:49 PM
Author: Jet legal warrant

is she an auto-appointee to ginsburg's seat?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#31052213)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 22nd, 2017 4:13 PM
Author: Aggressive pontificating twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#33619131)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 22nd, 2017 4:31 PM
Author: swollen pisswyrm codepig

Great law professor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#33619244)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 22nd, 2017 4:38 PM
Author: Irradiated Orange Chapel Masturbator

Huge fucking titties, even bigger than Sotomayor's.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#33619282)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 4th, 2019 2:44 PM
Author: Glassy multi-colored abode

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19969140

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#39214605)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 11th, 2019 1:06 AM
Author: Glassy multi-colored abode



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#39246487)