The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Reminder: Pam Karlan is the next Obama SCOTUS nominee
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 14th, 2012 6:16 PM Author: motley startling community account ywia (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964177) |
Date: February 14th, 2012 6:18 PM Author: cerebral library sandwich shes actually quite smart (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964185) |
 |
Date: February 14th, 2012 10:56 PM Author: motley startling community account has this ever been in honest dispute (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966314) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 10:57 PM Author: angry mother mood if you read her work on the vra I think there are some serious questions about her intellectual honesty, but she's supersmart (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966327) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:04 PM Author: motley startling community account vra? educate me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966416) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:09 PM Author: angry mother mood voting rights act. when lib profs in the 90s started to be like "oh shit, drawing all these super-black districts suboptimally clusters reliable democratic voters in a few districts instead of spreading them around," she, because she's extremely committed to legally mandated minority districting, wrote some very dubious stuff claiming that it had no effect on democratic electoral chances at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966467) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:10 PM Author: motley startling community account so fucking what if she likes gerrymandering; fucking 'originalists' pick and choose history who the fuck cares if dem/liberals pick voting districts (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966487) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:19 PM Author: angry mother mood well, that's an insane analogy, but leaving that aside, and her fondness for gerrymandering aside, the point I'm making here is just that she really warped the data to make it look like racial districting wouldn't harm the democratic party because she loves racial districting and was worried it would lose support if libs realized it fucked them over politically (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966574) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:24 PM Author: motley startling community account doesn't fuck dems over.
what fucks dems over is an inability to agree on central issues & a president who has inherited / exacerbated a weak economy |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:28 PM Author: angry mother mood no I don't think you understand. let's imagine, to simplify this, what would happen to obama's electoral hopes if all the black voters moved to a single state. Obama wouldn't be able to carry anywhere but that state and New England (even now, he has 39% approval rating with whites), and he'd lose massively in the electoral college. similar, though less exaggerated, things happen when linedrawers draw a few districts that maximize black population. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966669) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:30 PM Author: motley startling community account no man, i get it; you're saying once people wise up to the fact that democratic presidential hopes ride on line-drawing a majority of the electoral college, they'll change the districts. i'm saying people are dumb (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966697) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:34 PM Author: angry mother mood no, I'm not saying that, you can't line-draw the electoral college, it depends on state boundaries that are set in stone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966729) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:34 PM Author: motley startling community account no im saying, if you can line draw the districts that in turn determine outcomes, you effectively linedraw the electoral college results (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966740) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:36 PM Author: angry mother mood districts don't affect electoral college results, electoral college votes are allocated on a winner-takes-all, statewide basis except in 2 states (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966754) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:36 PM Author: motley startling community account oh, then fuck it --- i have no response to your vra critique (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966759) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:38 PM Author: angry mother mood yeah, the districts affect who gets elected in congress (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966781) |
|
Date: February 15th, 2012 12:57 PM Author: primrose site regret LOL, OWNED! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19969118) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 6:20 PM Author: angry mother mood so smart, so uncomfirmable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964199) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:08 PM Author: motley startling community account why? because liberal and/or not on the bench? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966460) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 6:24 PM Author: lake pea-brained property karate uh you can't have a scissor 3-way (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964215) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 6:26 PM Author: cerebral library sandwich karlan will be the judge of that. i mean justice HAHA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964220) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 6:36 PM Author: maniacal indian lodge new version well, she's certainly ugly enough to be a SCOTUS (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19964282) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:21 PM Author: Cowardly Lime Home http://www.stanford.edu/group/scspi/affiliates/pix/karlan_pamela.jpg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966596) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:24 PM Author: frisky church building police squad *doobs* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966619) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:26 PM Author: Cowardly Lime Home Sup chalmers (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966640) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 10:57 PM Author: violent striped hyena set so three unmarried lesbian women on the Court (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966328) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 10:58 PM Author: bronze useless theater stage deer antler she'll likely be gay "married" by the time she gets the nomnomnom (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966332) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:02 PM Author: motley startling community account who the fuck cares; she's a fuckton more preftigiouf than you.
it's laughable that we think heterosexual marriage is somehow more legitimate |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:29 PM Author: bronze useless theater stage deer antler yeah bro, laughable. LMAO.
please, defend your assertion that heterosexual marriage has less of a claim to legitimacy than the joke of a system you libpedos are foisting upon the country. |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:31 PM Author: motley startling community account heterosexual marriages dissolve 50%+ of the time; they also go against human nature, since from an darwinian standpoint, monogamy is fucking stupid
thus if men want to marry other men, it's no more or less a 'natural' state of affairs, glenn beck |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:39 PM Author: angry mother mood that thus didn't really follow, now did it. like there are degrees of non-naturalness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966790) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:43 PM Author: motley startling community account doesn't disprove my point; heterosexual marriage is not some sort of natural, "correct" state of affairs. it's just a dominant institution that like other dominant institutions (slavery, religion, apple pie on fourth of july) can eventually lapse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966815) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:45 PM Author: bronze useless theater stage deer antler how many cocks have you sucked in your life, faggot? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966829) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:48 PM Author: motley startling community account none. straight. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966855) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:55 PM Author: bronze useless theater stage deer antler no straight person is this retardedly gung ho about gay marriage. this sort of ridiculous bullshit is only spoken by militantly gay retards like yourself.
so spill it faggot: how many dicks? |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:56 PM Author: angry mother mood he's too ugly to attract gay men enough to let him give them head (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966895) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:45 PM Author: angry mother mood obviously the claim "there are different degrees of non-naturalness" doesn't disprove your point, but you cannot reason from "hetero marriage isn't natural" to "it's no more natural than gay marriage." seems to me that:
a) marriage isn't natural, so both straight and gay marriage have x amount of non-naturalness to them, but b) gay sex is undoubtedly less natural than straight sex, so c) gay marriage is even less natural than straight marriage |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:48 PM Author: motley startling community account how does sex have anything to do with marriage?
heterosexual sex is definitely more natural. it being more natural has nothing to do with heterosexual marriage being more natural |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:50 PM Author: bronze useless theater stage deer antler yeah bro, marriage has nothing at all to do with raising kids. it's totally an irrelevant, outmoded institution.
you sould like a total fucking scholar. again, tell me how many dicks youve sucked you relentless faggot. |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:52 PM Author: motley startling community account lol at you. im not sure the darwinian concept of having sex and having kids implies anything about raising them in a nuclear family. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966873) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:54 PM Author: bronze useless theater stage deer antler really. you're not sure? please, expound on your brilliant thesis, friend. i'm sure that your analysis of this issue is razor sharp.
|
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:51 PM Author: angry mother mood sex is a component of marriage, kind of central to marriage, even (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966870) |
|
Date: February 14th, 2012 11:49 PM Author: bronze useless theater stage deer antler dont you get it bro? hetero marriage is an antiquated institution that stupid ameriKKKans have foisted on us as a people and which we must free ourselves of. it joins other garbage human institutions like working to earn a living, not raping kids and not shitting in the street. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966861) |
|
Date: February 15th, 2012 1:02 PM Author: buck-toothed crimson yarmulke 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19969158) |
|
Date: February 15th, 2012 12:03 AM Author: violent striped hyena set monogamy definitely serves biological purposes and regularly occurs in nature among certain animals (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19966943) |
|
Date: February 15th, 2012 1:00 PM Author: Stubborn rusted university She got dem tet tets (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19969140) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2016 9:39 AM Author: Electric jet-lagged base (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#31032374) |
|
Date: July 28th, 2016 2:49 PM Author: Mauve contagious giraffe is she an auto-appointee to ginsburg's seat? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#31052213) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2017 4:13 PM Author: brass theatre (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#33619131) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2017 4:31 PM Author: glassy box office incel Great law professor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#33619244) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2017 4:38 PM Author: Mint bipolar toaster Huge fucking titties, even bigger than Sotomayor's. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#33619282) |
|
Date: December 4th, 2019 2:44 PM Author: Arousing Shrine Place Of Business http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#19969140 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#39214605) |
|
Date: December 11th, 2019 1:06 AM Author: Arousing Shrine Place Of Business (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1874084&forum_id=2#39246487) |