Are REVENGE PORN laws constitutional?
| Supple dragon | 12/02/14 | | Saffron bisexual selfie nursing home | 12/02/14 | | citrine cocky stead doctorate | 12/02/14 | | Supple dragon | 12/02/14 | | Aromatic Submissive Police Squad | 12/02/14 | | Saffron bisexual selfie nursing home | 12/02/14 | | provocative field ladyboy | 12/02/14 | | Supple dragon | 12/02/14 | | bearded base ratface | 12/02/14 | | self-centered slippery halford | 12/02/14 | | Supple dragon | 12/02/14 | | contagious rehab immigrant | 01/06/15 | | Supple dragon | 01/06/15 | | sienna stirring point headpube | 01/06/15 | | Bossy theater stage | 01/06/15 | | awkward disturbing school cafeteria | 04/06/15 | | Comical tantric gay wizard old irish cottage | 11/23/17 | | Dead messiness hissy fit | 11/23/17 | | emerald laughsome sanctuary | 04/06/15 | | Alcoholic arousing brunch pocket flask | 04/06/15 | | Titillating Piazza | 11/23/17 | | Titillating Piazza | 11/23/17 | | Dead messiness hissy fit | 11/23/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 2nd, 2014 12:27 PM Author: Supple dragon
That it's a photograph in question, legally obtained and owned, should be no different than the legality of relaying a true story that happened ("my GF is a slut") or other material. In a free society, it is our right to distribute this kind of information at will, should it not cross the line to harassment or fraudulence. Ethically it sucks, but shouldn't be criminalized.
Criminalizing photography or sharing of photography is absolutely fucked. People need to know that if you let someone photograph you that those photo belong to that person. This applies in every other case so distorting the law to reflect people's dislike of revenge porn is nothing more than stupid legislation.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2744877&forum_id=2#26842028) |
|
|