Weird movie, that one. Not bad.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3223523&forum_id=2#30478550)

http://www.lexido.com/EBOOK_TEXTS/THE_GAY_SCIENCE_FIFTH_BOOK_.aspx?S=361

"As regards the Jews, however, people par excellence, we should, in conformity to this line of thought, expect to see among them a world-wide historical institution at the very first, for the rearing of actors, a proper breeding-place for actors; and in fact the question is very pertinent just now: what good actor at present is not a Jew? The Jew also, as a born literary man, as the actual ruler of the European press, exercises this power on the basis of his histrionic capacity: for the literary man is essentially an actor, he plays the part of "expert” of "specialist". Finally, women. If we consider the whole history of women, are they not obliged first of all, and above all to be actresses? If we listen to doctors who have hypnotised women, or, finally, if we love them and let ourselves be "hypnotised" by them, what is always divulged thereby? That they "give themselves airs” even when they "give themselves". Woman is so artistic."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3223523&forum_id=2#30570529)