\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: ...
odious bearded kitchen
  12/23/16
Because REASONS
tan legend
  12/23/16
he disqualified himself
aphrodisiac business firm
  12/23/16
...
Exciting Chrome Roast Beef
  12/23/16
"no person holding any office of profit or trust under ...
Misunderstood Spectacular Area Rigor
  12/23/16
I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this
Fantasy-prone gunner sweet tailpipe
  12/23/16
...
Jet Shivering Stain Marketing Idea
  12/23/16
she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as So...
Flatulent Dragon
  12/23/16
lolno especially not if you also look at what Bill and th...
Fantasy-prone gunner sweet tailpipe
  12/23/16
i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline ...
Flatulent Dragon
  12/23/16
no, I don't think that's what they're saying
Trip Cowardly Feces Resort
  12/23/16
The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and...
Flatulent Dragon
  12/23/16
"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind what...
Flatulent Dragon
  12/23/16
How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?
lascivious headpube piazza
  12/23/16
Nbd just starting a conversation
Jet Shivering Stain Marketing Idea
  12/23/16
Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton found...
exhilarant garrison
  12/23/16
they did an end run around this by changing her job at State...
Fantasy-prone gunner sweet tailpipe
  12/23/16
...
Jet-lagged Frisky Factory Reset Button
  12/23/16
...
Claret box office becky
  01/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: odious bearded kitchen

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.

There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.

People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: tan legend

Because REASONS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211895)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: aphrodisiac business firm

he disqualified himself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211894)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:39 AM
Author: Exciting Chrome Roast Beef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212186)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: Misunderstood Spectacular Area Rigor

"no person holding any office of profit or trust under them" - wait, so shitlibs are saying that this means that no government employee may have any business interests at all?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211904)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:03 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone gunner sweet tailpipe

I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211919)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:11 AM
Author: Jet Shivering Stain Marketing Idea



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212003)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:12 AM
Author: Flatulent Dragon

she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as SoS, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212016)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone gunner sweet tailpipe

lolno

especially not if you also look at what Bill and their "foundation" were pocketing while she was SOS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212054)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:47 AM
Author: Flatulent Dragon

i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline or something like that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212220)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: Trip Cowardly Feces Resort

no, I don't think that's what they're saying

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211924)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: Flatulent Dragon

The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and has no backup for Tribe's conclusion so he just says "the better view" or "the best view" or something like that. He's a hack and this is a hack argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212027)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:10 AM
Author: Flatulent Dragon

"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever ..."

it's obvious that ordinary business interests isn't what this clause was getting at. George Washington was an active businessman and entrepreneur throughout his presidency.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211993)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: lascivious headpube piazza

How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211930)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: Jet Shivering Stain Marketing Idea

Nbd just starting a conversation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212032)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: exhilarant garrison

Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton foundation at the same time as State?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212047)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:44 AM
Author: Fantasy-prone gunner sweet tailpipe

they did an end run around this by changing her job at State to some sort of phony "consultant" arrangement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212204)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:51 AM
Author: Jet-lagged Frisky Factory Reset Button



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212239)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2018 6:36 PM
Author: Claret box office becky



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#35198850)