\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: ...
Claret wild point puppy
  12/23/16
Because REASONS
umber slap-happy faggot firefighter
  12/23/16
he disqualified himself
diverse frisky potus
  12/23/16
...
Nudist thriller cruise ship
  12/23/16
"no person holding any office of profit or trust under ...
Citrine mentally impaired dopamine giraffe
  12/23/16
I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this
Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican
  12/23/16
...
ruby demanding stage
  12/23/16
she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as So...
Flushed marketing idea headpube
  12/23/16
lolno especially not if you also look at what Bill and th...
Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican
  12/23/16
i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline ...
Flushed marketing idea headpube
  12/23/16
no, I don't think that's what they're saying
indecent son of senegal brunch
  12/23/16
The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and...
Flushed marketing idea headpube
  12/23/16
"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind what...
Flushed marketing idea headpube
  12/23/16
How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?
Chestnut idiotic rigor piazza
  12/23/16
Nbd just starting a conversation
ruby demanding stage
  12/23/16
Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton found...
razzmatazz lay
  12/23/16
they did an end run around this by changing her job at State...
Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican
  12/23/16
...
Floppy hall
  12/23/16
...
Heady Liquid Oxygen Mad Cow Disease
  01/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: Claret wild point puppy

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.

There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.

People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: umber slap-happy faggot firefighter

Because REASONS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211895)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM
Author: diverse frisky potus

he disqualified himself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211894)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:39 AM
Author: Nudist thriller cruise ship



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212186)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:00 AM
Author: Citrine mentally impaired dopamine giraffe

"no person holding any office of profit or trust under them" - wait, so shitlibs are saying that this means that no government employee may have any business interests at all?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211904)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:03 AM
Author: Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican

I look forward to SOS Hillary Clinton's response to this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211919)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:11 AM
Author: ruby demanding stage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212003)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:12 AM
Author: Flushed marketing idea headpube

she started pocketing the big cash after stepping down as SoS, right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212016)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican

lolno

especially not if you also look at what Bill and their "foundation" were pocketing while she was SOS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212054)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:47 AM
Author: Flushed marketing idea headpube

i'm sure your right, but is there a good link to a timeline or something like that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212220)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: indecent son of senegal brunch

no, I don't think that's what they're saying

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211924)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: Flushed marketing idea headpube

The Tribe white paper on this gets to that hard question and has no backup for Tribe's conclusion so he just says "the better view" or "the best view" or something like that. He's a hack and this is a hack argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212027)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:10 AM
Author: Flushed marketing idea headpube

"present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever ..."

it's obvious that ordinary business interests isn't what this clause was getting at. George Washington was an active businessman and entrepreneur throughout his presidency.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211993)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:04 AM
Author: Chestnut idiotic rigor piazza

How angry are shitlibs over the sexist language?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211930)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:15 AM
Author: ruby demanding stage

Nbd just starting a conversation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212032)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:17 AM
Author: razzmatazz lay

Wasn't Huma violating this when she worked for Clinton foundation at the same time as State?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212047)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:44 AM
Author: Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican

they did an end run around this by changing her job at State to some sort of phony "consultant" arrangement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212204)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2016 10:51 AM
Author: Floppy hall



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32212239)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 20th, 2018 6:36 PM
Author: Heady Liquid Oxygen Mad Cow Disease



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#35198850)