The Emoluments Clause says: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United
| Claret wild point puppy | 12/23/16 | | umber slap-happy faggot firefighter | 12/23/16 | | diverse frisky potus | 12/23/16 | | Nudist thriller cruise ship | 12/23/16 | | Citrine mentally impaired dopamine giraffe | 12/23/16 | | Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican | 12/23/16 | | ruby demanding stage | 12/23/16 | | Flushed marketing idea headpube | 12/23/16 | | Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican | 12/23/16 | | Flushed marketing idea headpube | 12/23/16 | | indecent son of senegal brunch | 12/23/16 | | Flushed marketing idea headpube | 12/23/16 | | Flushed marketing idea headpube | 12/23/16 | | Chestnut idiotic rigor piazza | 12/23/16 | | ruby demanding stage | 12/23/16 | | razzmatazz lay | 12/23/16 | | Beady-eyed Lemon Mexican | 12/23/16 | | Floppy hall | 12/23/16 | | Heady Liquid Oxygen Mad Cow Disease | 01/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 23rd, 2016 9:59 AM Author: Claret wild point puppy
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
It was intended to forbid foreign states from compromising our our executive office holders. I don't see where it says an exec office holder cannot have business enterprises in foreign countries.
There has been extremely little judicial development of it either. Really only OLC opinions on it exist, and those are binding on no one.
People who say trump will be violating the constitution - what exactly is the argument for that?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3469442&forum_id=2#32211884) |
|
|