With machine learning, won't 95% of coders/programmers become obsolete?
| aromatic cowardly juggernaut hunting ground | 01/17/17 | | Primrose Tattoo Abode | 01/17/17 | | Spectacular jet heaven | 01/17/17 | | mustard misanthropic house | 01/17/17 | | big-titted pit patrolman | 01/17/17 | | cracking ladyboy | 01/17/17 | | big-titted pit patrolman | 01/17/17 | | cracking ladyboy | 01/17/17 | | big-titted pit patrolman | 01/17/17 | | cracking ladyboy | 01/17/17 | | Overrated Spot | 01/17/17 | | Primrose Tattoo Abode | 01/17/17 | | Saffron stirring multi-billionaire | 02/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: January 17th, 2017 5:40 PM Author: big-titted pit patrolman
you need to know what questions to ask etc
and getting the computer to tell you what you want, i assume, will require some knowledge of how the computer is giving you what you want
computers can't "just do data analysis"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3494212&forum_id=2#32394324) |
|
Date: January 17th, 2017 6:53 PM Author: big-titted pit patrolman
there is always opportunity for value-added work when the people doing the creative tasks are more knowledgeable about the nuts and bolts because they can find new ways to use the nuts and bolts, and to use them more efficiently.
and, in fact, this usually makes knowledge of the nuts and bolts a requirement over time. insofar as people know there's value in knowing the technical skills in industry x, people planning to go into industry x get those skills. many, many industries now see knowledge of at least basic data manipulation and analysis as a basic requirement and weren't requiring it only recently.
it's not so much as the creative workers just feeding the information to the stats phds, but whatever applicable skills the stats phds have becoming required.
regardless of who is touching the nuts and bolts the point is that there is a space in which you need a human to be manipulating things, and insofar as this is true, and insofar as the capabilities of the nuts and bolts are flexible, it's valuable to be able to have whatever knowledge is needed to work with them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3494212&forum_id=2#32394706) |
Date: January 17th, 2017 5:52 PM Author: Overrated Spot
machine learning isn't magic.
right now the most advanced machine learning applications requires HUGE data sets and massive processing power to train an application to do a very specific task. a lot of machine learning requires intense human intervention. this is why it's taken years and years for ibm's jeopardy-winning watson program to do anything useful outside of winning jeopardy--there is no magic ai. ibm just handcrafted a really really good jeopardy-playing program; you can't just feed medical journals into "watson" to make it spit out the right answers.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3494212&forum_id=2#32394387) |
|
|