STory full of cucks and very sad! Front page!!

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/magazine/is-an-open-marriage-a-happier-marriage.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33279770)

I really just felt like it was right, like it was important to my growth. It was like I was choosing to take a stand for my own pleasure and sticking to it. It was so strong, that feeling. I really just felt like it was right, like it was important to my growth. It was like I was choosing to take a stand for my own pleasure and sticking to it. It was so strong, that feeling. I really just felt like it was right, like it was important to my growth. It was like I was choosing to take a stand for my own pleasure and sticking to it. It was so strong, that feeling. I really just felt like it was right, like it was important to my growth. It was like I was choosing to take a stand for my own pleasure and sticking to it. It was so strong, that feeling. I really just felt like it was right, like it was important to my growth. It was like I was choosing to take a stand for my own pleasure and sticking to it. It was so strong, that feeling.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33281979)

It's an oxymoron. Either one makes a commitment or one does not. If you made a mistake, get divorced. The only reasons these arrangements exist is to enjoy sexual variety. No one has children with another in an "open marriage", no one buys a home together, or makes a plan for keeping grandma in her home. It's about sex. And thus there is nothing academic to be "studied" here - just charlatans looking for grant dollars from the credulous. Another silly

"investigation" into a lifestyle of hedonism, character failure, self-importance and made-up mumbo-jumbo to justify the narcissism that has shark-jumped from the homosexual world into the larger society to lasting detriment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33279867)

"Now i just lick their assholes clean instead--not only does it cut down on costs, but it's more ecologically friendly. 'Eating brown to go green,' I say."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33283777)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33280102)

I thought that by the time I met Joe and Zaeli and Blake in February at their home in Austin that I had become used to the idea of openness. But from the moment I entered their house, I did not know where to look. Joe, warm and outgoing, greeted me at the door, making small talk I could barely engage in, as his wife and Blake were, at that moment, nuzzling by the stove, reunited after having been apart for most of the day. We sat down to dinner, Blake ushering their daughter — Joe and Zaeli’s daughter, biologically, but one Blake was helping to raise as part of the family — to the table. Blake does more day-to-day caregiving of Joe’s child than Joe does, given his more relaxed work hours, and Blake also does most of the cooking. That night, he made a Thai chicken soup for

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/05/14/magazine/14marriage7/14marriage7-superJumbo.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33280138)

edit: nm this is a stupid question

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33280199)

jj rate her farts

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33281941)

Elizabeth claimed to have no ambivalence about his weekend away. She said she knew from experience that an outside relationship did not have to diminish your love for your spouse. And yet when Daniel returned, he found her a little bit cold, judgmental not about the premise of the weekend, she said, but about the particulars. She and Joseph had waited for months before having intercourse, building the relationship first; Daniel did not wait, which bothered Elizabeth. Also, Daniel had called her to say hello, which she had not expected, then jumped off the phone for a work call and failed to call back. That she did not like — the feeling that he had engaged her, almost deliberately, and then left her hanging, as if to force her to concentrate on him in his absence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33280891)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33284787)

I only read the Elizabeth and Daniel part. So basically she cheated and then said "surprise, here's the open marriage you wanted!" and then got jealous once he was getting some side action of his own. That about right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33281724)

ISIS take the wheel...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33282019)

A beautifully written story, which has transformed the way I see and experience all my relationships, sexual and non-sexual, male and female.

The deep compassion of the author, Susan Dominus, snuck up on me, like a Siamese cat wandering silently into my room, who begins to rub herself against my feet.

The emotional strings Susan Dominus played on my heart struck so deeply that I remembered, once again, who I was, and what I wanted.

As I continued to read, I began to sense that she was about to reveal something very significant about her own life.

This is journalism at its finest.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33283577)

*decide he's an unthreatening manlet*

*return home 2 slamfuck ur wife*

XOXO POWERCUCK DANIEL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33285639)

But as with any happy marriage, there were frustrations. Daniel liked sex, and not long after they were married, it became clear that Elizabeth’s interest in it had cooled. She thought hers was the normal response: She was raised by strict Catholics, she would tell Daniel, as if that explained it, and she never saw her own parents hold hands, much less kiss. It was not as if she and Daniel never had sex, but when they did, Daniel often felt lonely in his desire for something more — not necessarily exotic sex but sex in which both partners cared about it, and cared about each other, with one of those interests fueling the other.

Elizabeth, baffled by Daniel’s disappointment, wondered: How great does sex have to be for a person to be happy?

With:

They met once more, and that afternoon, in the parking lot, he kissed her beside his car, someone else’s mouth on hers for the first time in 24 years. It did not occur to her to resist.

And:

The sex, too, was different, more varied, as if reflecting the inventing going on in their marriage. Elizabeth was still someone’s wife, still her children’s mother, but now she was also somebody’s girlfriend, desired and desiring; now her own marriage was also new to her

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33285737)

"There is also a political component here that could have been addressed too, and I'd like to share this now. Many conservatives - and Trump voters in particular - are deeply threatened by this approach to love. They call progressive men "betas," or "cuckolds" as if it's some grave form of insult, when in reality it takes a great deal of bravery and self-security to love one's spouse enough to let them love others as well. These deplorable conservatives used to shame gay people in the same way, and four decades ago I imagine the Times might have used the middle names of people in gay relationships too. Well now they can be open about it, and my hope is that the sexual revolution moves apace to a point where these poly-amorous couples can be just as open in the future."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3611127&forum_id=2#33286920)