Date: June 28th, 2017 3:35 PM
Author: angry alcoholic skinny woman
I would like to know the ruling on a practice which seems to becoming popular nowadays: that of stealing items (in Australia), under the pretence that it is booty of war.
For example, intentionally getting a phone on a plan and then leaving the country, or changing one's bank details etc, so that no payments are made to the company (Australian). Spreading to the extent of stealing any items one comes into contact with, from institutions and service providers, eg. schools and hospitals.
Is the ruling on this dependent on whether Australia is viewed/classified as a 'country of war', or is this practice addressable by a general ruling."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3660789&forum_id=2#33662044)