Choosing Biglaw SA
| Cracking soggy plaza gaming laptop | 08/17/17 | | titillating genital piercing area | 08/17/17 | | Cracking soggy plaza gaming laptop | 08/17/17 | | titillating genital piercing area | 08/17/17 | | Khaki hideous theater | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | titillating genital piercing area | 08/17/17 | | Khaki hideous theater | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | flesh roommate | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | flesh roommate | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | flesh roommate | 08/17/17 | | Khaki hideous theater | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | Khaki hideous theater | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | aphrodisiac walnut dopamine affirmative action | 08/17/17 | | White ungodly feces | 08/17/17 | | Maroon drunken school | 08/17/17 | | White ungodly feces | 08/17/17 | | flesh roommate | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | gaped skinny woman indian lodge | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | Cracking soggy plaza gaming laptop | 08/17/17 | | gaped skinny woman indian lodge | 08/17/17 | | supple dilemma | 08/17/17 | | Jet up-to-no-good kitchen | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent mother | 08/17/17 | | beta point | 08/17/17 | | Cracking soggy plaza gaming laptop | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent mother | 08/17/17 | | Cracking soggy plaza gaming laptop | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent mother | 08/17/17 | | Thirsty Burgundy Yarmulke French Chef | 08/17/17 | | Cracking soggy plaza gaming laptop | 08/17/17 | | White ungodly feces | 08/17/17 | | vigorous parlour potus | 08/17/17 | | Cracking soggy plaza gaming laptop | 08/17/17 | | aphrodisiac walnut dopamine affirmative action | 08/17/17 | | Cracking soggy plaza gaming laptop | 08/19/17 | | pea-brained set marketing idea | 08/17/17 | | peach bawdyhouse | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | Primrose place of business stag film | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | Primrose place of business stag film | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | Primrose place of business stag film | 08/17/17 | | carnelian mind-boggling locale digit ratio | 08/17/17 | | jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain | 08/17/17 | | carnelian mind-boggling locale digit ratio | 08/17/17 | | pea-brained set marketing idea | 08/17/17 | | peach bawdyhouse | 08/17/17 | | Primrose place of business stag film | 08/17/17 | | peach bawdyhouse | 08/17/17 | | Primrose place of business stag film | 08/17/17 | | peach bawdyhouse | 08/17/17 | | Primrose place of business stag film | 08/17/17 | | peach bawdyhouse | 08/17/17 | | Bipolar Abode | 08/17/17 | | pea-brained set marketing idea | 08/17/17 | | peach bawdyhouse | 08/17/17 | | pea-brained set marketing idea | 08/17/17 | | Bipolar Abode | 08/17/17 | | aphrodisiac walnut dopamine affirmative action | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: flesh roommate
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: flesh roommate
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: jet-lagged appetizing brunch stain
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: Bipolar Abode
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|