Choosing Biglaw SA
| internet-worthy french chef main people | 08/17/17 | | bearded twinkling state nibblets | 08/17/17 | | internet-worthy french chef main people | 08/17/17 | | bearded twinkling state nibblets | 08/17/17 | | chartreuse kink-friendly spot | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | bearded twinkling state nibblets | 08/17/17 | | chartreuse kink-friendly spot | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | Infuriating potus old irish cottage | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | Infuriating potus old irish cottage | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | Infuriating potus old irish cottage | 08/17/17 | | chartreuse kink-friendly spot | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | chartreuse kink-friendly spot | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | Light Self-centered Cumskin | 08/17/17 | | Rusted background story | 08/17/17 | | big fortuitous meteor | 08/17/17 | | Rusted background story | 08/17/17 | | Infuriating potus old irish cottage | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | bisexual copper stage sweet tailpipe | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | internet-worthy french chef main people | 08/17/17 | | bisexual copper stage sweet tailpipe | 08/17/17 | | beady-eyed nowag | 08/17/17 | | Motley lay cuckold | 08/17/17 | | razzle resort | 08/17/17 | | Coiffed disgusting legend | 08/17/17 | | internet-worthy french chef main people | 08/17/17 | | razzle resort | 08/17/17 | | internet-worthy french chef main people | 08/17/17 | | razzle resort | 08/17/17 | | onyx pervert dysfunction | 08/17/17 | | internet-worthy french chef main people | 08/17/17 | | Rusted background story | 08/17/17 | | scarlet round eye | 08/17/17 | | internet-worthy french chef main people | 08/17/17 | | Light Self-centered Cumskin | 08/17/17 | | internet-worthy french chef main people | 08/19/17 | | Racy mexican | 08/17/17 | | Spectacular fuchsia theater doctorate | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | sick shrine | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | sick shrine | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | sick shrine | 08/17/17 | | orchid digit ratio | 08/17/17 | | hairraiser kitchen karate | 08/17/17 | | orchid digit ratio | 08/17/17 | | Racy mexican | 08/17/17 | | Spectacular fuchsia theater doctorate | 08/17/17 | | sick shrine | 08/17/17 | | Spectacular fuchsia theater doctorate | 08/17/17 | | sick shrine | 08/17/17 | | Spectacular fuchsia theater doctorate | 08/17/17 | | sick shrine | 08/17/17 | | Spectacular fuchsia theater doctorate | 08/17/17 | | confused purple university | 08/17/17 | | Racy mexican | 08/17/17 | | Spectacular fuchsia theater doctorate | 08/17/17 | | Racy mexican | 08/17/17 | | confused purple university | 08/17/17 | | Light Self-centered Cumskin | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: Infuriating potus old irish cottage
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: Infuriating potus old irish cottage
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: hairraiser kitchen karate
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: confused purple university
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|