Free Speech has NO exceptions.

If you disagree or something someone says is anathema to all that is good in the world, refute it on a factual basis.

You can't just shut down what you don't like.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34470033)

*shouts fire in crowded theater*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34470629)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34472521)

Freedom of "expression" no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34470085)

Even Donald Trump doesn't actually support those policies. They are a way to signal combativeness and generate political drama.

In contrast, a lot of people on the left, especially in universities, actually do want to censor unpopular speech. And they have. Repeatedly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34470546)

But that doesn't absolve Democrats/leftists/progressives from their anti-free-speech policies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34470653)

Leftist SJWs are certainly a threat to free speech too but IMO Trump is a bigger one at the moment given the power he had and the threats he's made.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34471201)

The liberals have already gone after free speech. Between street violence against conservative speakers, to ruthless censorship of conservative views on basically every tech platform.

The last step is to introduce hate speech laws. The Dems have been conditioning their base to accept this for years. If they can stack SCOTUS they'll get their wish.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34470652)

Shitlibs do this as a deflection from their blatant hypocrisy when it comes to shutting down speech they don't like.

When they don't like the speech, they happily scream: "Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from the CONSEQUENCES of that speech!"

But when they do like it, they create deflections and scarecrows like the one this guy just poasted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34472041)

More importantly, you failed to address your hypocrisy that I noted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34472715)

But with few exceptions, conservative leaders/pundits/academics/politicians don't push for that kind of thing. That stands in contrast to liberal leaders/pundits/academics/politicians.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34472556)

of course it's still horrible and not justified at all, but maybe it didn't totally come out of nowhere.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3767577&forum_id=2#34472891)