FACT 1: "The differences in morphology (cranial and facial features) between human races are typically around ten times the corresponding differences between the sexes within a given race, larger even than the comparable differences taxonomists use to distinguish the two chimpanzee species from each other. To the best of our knowledge, human racial differences exceed those for any other non-domesticated species. One must look to the breeds of dogs to find a comparable degree of within-species differences in morphology."[1]

FACT 2: Fixation index, or FST, is a way to measure genetic distance between populations. The FST between Whites (British) and Blacks (Bantu) is 0.23.[2] The FST between the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus) is 0.103[3] which is half the White-Black difference despite the two being classified as separate species. The FST between two gorilla species, Gorilla gorilla and Gorilla beringei is 0.04[4][5] or 1/6 the difference between Blacks and Whites. The FST between humans and Neanderthals is less than 0.08[6][7][8] or about 1/3 the Black-White difference. The FST between humans and homo erectus is 0.17[9] which is 3/4 the Black-White distance. Thus Whites and Blacks are more genetically distant than two different chimpanzee species, two different gorilla species, humans vs Neanderthals, and humans vs homo erectus. If one is consistent and objective with taxonomic classification systems even in regards to human populations, Blacks and Whites could (and arguably should) be classified into separate species and at the very least into different subspecies.

FACT 6: Often times egalitarians will bring up Haldane's rule, arguing that since races can mix and create fertile offspring, the genetic distance is not too great. Haldane's rule is "when in the offspring of two different animal races one sex is absent, rare, or sterile, that sex is the heterogametic [XY] sex."[19] Indeed, although Black-White mixes are not sterile and males are not absent, males (the heterogametic sex) are more rare than females.[20] The argument regarding Haldane's rule is also meaningless because different species in the animal kingdom can breed and still produce fertile offspring.

The wolf (Canis lupus) and the dog (Canis lupus familiaris), the coyote (Canis latrans), and the common jackal (Canis aureus) are separate species yet can all interbreed and produce fertile offspring.[65] Two species of orangutan (Pongo abellii from Sumatra and Pongo pygmaeus from Borneo) can interbreed despite having different chromosomal numbers.[66] The common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus) and many species of birds, such as the pintail (Anas acuta) and the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), can interbreed as well.[67][68] The gibbon and the siamang can also interbreed to produce a hybrid[159][160] and some species that aren't in the same genus can interbreed.[161]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3768946&forum_id=2#34482783)

FACT 6: Often times egalitarians will bring up Haldane's rule, arguing that since races can mix and create fertile offspring, the genetic distance is not too great. Haldane's rule is "when in the offspring of two different animal races one sex is absent, rare, or sterile, that sex is the heterogametic [XY] sex."[19] Indeed, although Black-White mixes are not sterile and males are not absent, males (the heterogametic sex) are more rare than females.[20] The argument regarding Haldane's rule is also meaningless because different species in the animal kingdom can breed and still produce fertile offspring.

The wolf (Canis lupus) and the dog (Canis lupus familiaris), the coyote (Canis latrans), and the common jackal (Canis aureus) are separate species yet can all interbreed and produce fertile offspring.[65] Two species of orangutan (Pongo abellii from Sumatra and Pongo pygmaeus from Borneo) can interbreed despite having different chromosomal numbers.[66] The common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus) and many species of birds, such as the pintail (Anas acuta) and the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), can interbreed as well.[67][68] The gibbon and the siamang can also interbreed to produce a hybrid[159][160] and some species that aren't in the same genus can interbreed.[161]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3768946&forum_id=2#34533440)

which is the cause of multiple negative health effects due to genetic

incompatibility. Indeed, consistent with Haldane's rule, unmixed Blacks from

Africa and White Americans do not have the same rate of birth problems

that hybrid American Blacks have: "In 2005, the mortality rate for black

infants was 4.4 times higher than that of white infants... African women

who come to the United States and have babies experience the same low

rate of infant deaths as white American mothers."[22] "Indiscriminate

interbreeding between distinct forms, whether 'species' or markedly

different races, is not generally beneficial. The defect may show in a change

in the sex-ratio of the offspring, probably caused by the early abortion of

members of one sex, generally the male in the case of mammals."[24]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3768946&forum_id=2#34483022)

since average faces are considered more attractive[28] then mixed race

offspring are more attractive. However this is fallacious as it assumes we are

designed for perfect symmetry, when in fact the magnitude of asymmetry is

the correct measurement and this random component fluctuates, also called

"fluctuating asymmetry" - so more honestly a lower level of asymmetry

correlates with increased attractiveness, not symmetry.[29] But does increased

heterozygosity cause lower asymmetry? A meta analysis of 118 datasets in

14 studies showed a very weak inverse correlation between the two,

showing that increased heterozygosity has no beneficial effect on symmetry

or asymmetry[30]. One study on the craniofacial morphology in WhiteAmerindian

mixed race individuals found that over half of the 52 shape

variables deviated from the mathematical average[181] completely shattering

the above argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3768946&forum_id=2#34483024)

that "Adolescents who identify themselves as mixed race are at higher health

and behavior risk than those of 1 race." Indeed, even when controlling for

education, socioeconomic status, and other factors, there is an across-theboard

higher rate of health risks amongst mixed race adolescents than

mono-racial adolescents.[18] One study found that White-Asian mixes had a

2x higher rate of being "diagnosed with a psychological disorder, such as

anxiety, depression or substance abuse."[171] A study on Black-White mixes in

agreement found that "When it comes to engaging in risky/anti-social

adolescent behavior, however, mixed race adolescents are stark outliers

compared to both blacks and whites." This holds true despite being raised in

similar environments to mono-racial children.[180]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3768946&forum_id=2#34483039)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3768946&forum_id=2#34537422)