John Kelly and the Language of the Military Coup (NYT)
| Dull school pistol | 10/20/17 | | nudist institution | 10/20/17 | | apoplectic crawly genital piercing dingle berry | 10/20/17 | | nudist institution | 10/20/17 | | Gaped Adventurous Boistinker Field | 10/20/17 | | Zippy autistic karate | 10/20/17 | | Rose Aphrodisiac Forum | 10/20/17 | | Silver domesticated deer antler | 10/20/17 | | Razzmatazz set | 10/20/17 | | Bearded masturbator | 10/20/17 | | burgundy tank | 10/21/17 | | appetizing low-t azn | 10/20/17 | | Violent office | 10/20/17 | | pearly anal ladyboy | 10/20/17 | | mahogany boiling water | 10/20/17 | | Rebellious irate base | 10/20/17 | | ruby zombie-like jewess | 10/20/17 | | Hairraiser green mental disorder theater stage | 10/20/17 | | Rebellious irate base | 10/20/17 | | tripping brethren | 10/20/17 | | dark public bath dysfunction | 10/20/17 | | Violent office | 10/20/17 | | Bat-shit-crazy trailer park | 10/21/17 | | Mauve excitant whorehouse feces | 01/20/18 | | ruby zombie-like jewess | 10/20/17 | | appetizing low-t azn | 10/20/17 | | appetizing low-t azn | 10/20/17 | | ruby zombie-like jewess | 10/20/17 | | Up-to-no-good home water buffalo | 10/20/17 | | blathering arousing yarmulke brunch | 10/21/17 | | purple razzle affirmative action wrinkle | 10/20/17 | | cheese-eating menage persian | 10/20/17 | | Bat-shit-crazy trailer park | 10/21/17 | | supple meetinghouse | 10/21/17 | | Up-to-no-good home water buffalo | 10/20/17 | | Gold flirting sweet tailpipe crackhouse | 10/21/17 | | insane indian lodge community account | 10/20/17 | | ruby zombie-like jewess | 10/20/17 | | Rebellious irate base | 10/20/17 | | nofapping site | 10/21/17 | | Godawful buck-toothed hospital | 10/20/17 | | Dull school pistol | 10/20/17 | | Costumed jap mood | 10/20/17 | | burgundy tank | 10/21/17 | | vibrant kitchen | 10/20/17 | | Silver domesticated deer antler | 10/20/17 | | mahogany boiling water | 10/20/17 | | magical flickering pisswyrm parlor | 10/20/17 | | Dull school pistol | 10/20/17 | | magical flickering pisswyrm parlor | 10/20/17 | | confused library love of her life | 10/20/17 | | Dull school pistol | 10/20/17 | | pearly anal ladyboy | 10/20/17 | | appetizing low-t azn | 10/20/17 | | burgundy tank | 10/21/17 | | copper 180 business firm | 10/20/17 | | Cyan House-broken National | 10/21/17 | | Violent office | 10/20/17 | | Fuchsia Coffee Pot | 10/20/17 | | burgundy tank | 10/21/17 | | Crimson charismatic shrine quadroon | 10/20/17 | | Zippy autistic karate | 10/20/17 | | mahogany boiling water | 10/20/17 | | appetizing low-t azn | 10/20/17 | | underhanded friendly grandma macaca | 10/20/17 | | cheese-eating menage persian | 10/20/17 | | maroon marketing idea | 10/21/17 | | Costumed jap mood | 10/21/17 | | thirsty digit ratio casino | 10/21/17 | | supple meetinghouse | 10/21/17 | | Cyan House-broken National | 10/21/17 | | Cyan House-broken National | 10/21/17 | | supple meetinghouse | 10/21/17 | | vivacious outnumbered boltzmann half-breed | 10/21/17 | | supple meetinghouse | 10/21/17 | | Bearded masturbator | 12/27/19 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 20th, 2017 12:46 PM Author: Dull school pistol
onsider this nightmare scenario: a military coup. You don’t have to strain your imagination—all you have to do is watch Thursday’s White House press briefing, in which the chief of staff, John Kelly, defended President Trump’s phone call to a military widow, Myeshia Johnson. The press briefing could serve as a preview of what a military coup in this country would look like, for it was in the logic of such a coup that Kelly advanced his four arguments.
Argument 1. Those who criticize the President don’t know what they’re talking about because they haven’t served in the military. To demonstrate how little lay people know, Kelly provided a long, detailed explanation of what happens when a soldier is killed in battle: the body is wrapped in whatever is handy, flown by helicopter, then packed in ice, then flown again, then repacked, then flown, then embalmed and dressed in uniform with medals, and then flown home. Kelly provided a similar amount of detail about how family members are notified of the death, when, and by whom. He even recommended a film that dramatized the process of transporting the body of a real-life marine, Private First Class Chance Phelps. This was a Trumpian moment, from the phrasing—“a very, very good movie”—to the message. Kelly stressed that Phelps “was killed under my command, right next to me”; in other words, Kelly’s real-life experience was recreated for television, and that, he seemed to think, bolstered his authority.
Fallen soldiers, Kelly said, join “the best one per cent this country produces.” Here, the chief of staff again reminded his audience of its ignorance: “Most of you, as Americans, don’t know them. Many of you don’t know anyone who knows any of them. But they are the very best this country produces.”
The one-per-cent figure is puzzling. The number of people currently serving in the military, both on active duty and in the reserves, is not even one per cent of all Americans. The number of veterans in the population is far higher: more than seven per cent. But, later in the speech, when Kelly described his own distress after hearing the criticism of Trump’s phone call, the general said that he had gone to “walk among the finest men and women on this earth. And you can always find them because they’re in Arlington National Cemetery.” So, by “the best” Americans, Kelly had meant dead Americans—specifically, fallen soldiers.
The number of Americans killed in all the wars this nation has ever fought is indeed equal to roughly one per cent of all Americans alive today. This makes for questionable math and disturbing logic. It is in totalitarian societies, which demand complete mobilization, that dying for one’s country becomes the ultimate badge of honor. Growing up in the Soviet Union, I learned the names of ordinary soldiers who threw their bodies onto enemy tanks, becoming literal cannon fodder. All of us children had to aspire to the feat of martyrdom. No Soviet general would have dared utter the kind of statement that’s attributed to General George S. Patton: “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.”
2. The President did the right thing because he did exactly what his general told him to do. Kelly went on a rambling explication of speaking to the President not once but twice about how to make the call to Myeshia Johnson. After Kelly’s son was killed while serving in Afghanistan, the chief of staff recalled, his own best friend had consoled him by saying that his son “was doing exactly what he wanted to do when he was killed. He knew what he was getting into by joining that one per cent.” Trump apparently tried to replicate this message when he told Johnson that her husband, La David, had known what he was signing up for. The negative reaction to this comment, Kelly said, had “stunned” him.
A week earlier, Kelly had taken over the White House press briefing in an attempt to quash another scandal and ended up using the phrase “I was sent in,” twice, in reference to his job in the White House. Now he seemed to be saying that, since he was sent in to control the President and the President had, this time, more or less carried out his instructions, the President should not be criticized.
3. Communication between the President and a military widow is no one’s business but theirs. A day earlier, the Washington Post had quoted a White House official saying, “The president’s conversations with the families of American heroes who have made the ultimate sacrifice are private.” The statement contained a classic Trumpian reversal: the President was claiming for himself the right to privacy that belonged to his interlocutor. But Myeshia Johnson had apparently voluntarily shared her conversation with her mother-in-law and Congresswoman Frederica Wilson by putting the President on speakerphone.
Now Kelly took it up a notch. Not only was he claiming that the President, communicating with a citizen in his official capacity, had a right to confidentiality—he was claiming that this right was “sacred.” Indeed, Kelly seemed to say, it was the last sacred thing in this country. He rattled off a litany of things that had lost their sanctity: women, life, religion, Gold Star families. The last of which had been profaned “in the convention over the summer,” said Kelly, although the convention in question was the Republican one and the debacle with a Gold Star family had been Trump’s doing. Now, Kelly seemed to say, we had descended into utter profanity, because the secrecy of the President’s phone call had been violated.
4. Citizens are ranked based on their proximity to dying for their country. Kelly’s last argument was his most striking. At the end of the briefing, he said that he would take questions only from those members of the press who had a personal connection to a fallen soldier, followed by those who knew a Gold Star family. Considering that, a few minutes earlier, Kelly had said most Americans didn’t even know anyone who knew anyone who belonged to the “one per cent,” he was now explicitly denying a majority of Americans—or the journalists representing them—the right to ask questions. This was a new twist on the Trump Administration’s technique of shunning and shaming unfriendly members of the news media, except this time, it was framed explicitly in terms of national loyalty. As if on cue, the first reporter allowed to speak inserted the phrase “Semper Fi”—a literal loyalty oath—into his question.
Before walking off the stage, Kelly told Americans who haven’t served in the military that he pities them. “We don’t look down upon those of you who haven’t served,” he said. “In fact, in a way we are a little bit sorry because you’ll have never have experienced the wonderful joy you get in your heart when you do the kinds of things our servicemen and women do—not for any other reason than that they love this country.”
When Kelly replaced the ineffectual Reince Priebus as the chief of staff, a sigh of relief emerged: at least the general would impose some discipline on the Administration. Now we have a sense of what military discipline in the White House sounds like.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/john-kelly-and-the-language-of-the-military-coup?mbid=social_twitter
This is a scary time in America. I need someone to hold me, because I'm scared.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#34487238) |
Date: October 20th, 2017 1:20 PM Author: Silver domesticated deer antler
what kind of person writes this:
"Fallen soldiers, Kelly said, join “the best one per cent this country produces.” Here, the chief of staff again reminded his audience of its ignorance: “Most of you, as Americans, don’t know them. Many of you don’t know anyone who knows any of them. But they are the very best this country produces.”
The one-per-cent figure is puzzling. The number of people currently serving in the military, both on active duty and in the reserves, is not even one per cent of all Americans. The number of veterans in the population is far higher: more than seven per cent. But, later in the speech, when Kelly described his own distress after hearing the criticism of Trump’s phone call, the general said that he had gone to “walk among the finest men and women on this earth. And you can always find them because they’re in Arlington National Cemetery.” So, by “the best” Americans, Kelly had meant dead Americans—specifically, fallen soldiers.
The number of Americans killed in all the wars this nation has ever fought is indeed equal to roughly one per cent of all Americans alive today. This makes for questionable math and disturbing logic. It is in totalitarian societies, which demand complete mobilization, that dying for one’s country becomes the ultimate badge of honor. Growing up in the Soviet Union, I learned the names of ordinary soldiers who threw their bodies onto enemy tanks, becoming literal cannon fodder. All of us children had to aspire to the feat of martyrdom. No Soviet general would have dared utter the kind of statement that’s attributed to General George S. Patton: “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.”
this is like a twisted aspie "fact check"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#34487557)
|
|
Date: October 20th, 2017 1:34 PM Author: Rebellious irate base
a lesbian russian jew is telling you how it is in america. better shut up and listen, goyim.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#34487694) |
|
Date: January 20th, 2018 11:00 PM Author: Mauve excitant whorehouse feces
6.
Transgender
Two decades after moving back to Russia, I left again. It was one of those impossible choices that don’t feel like much of a choice: I was one of many people pushed out of the country during the crackdown that followed the protests of 2011–2012. Some were given the choice between emigrating or going to prison. My options were emigrating or seeing social services go after my kids, on the grounds that I am queer.
What had happened to the life my discontinuous self was leading back in America while I was in Russia? My writing life had been proceeding apace, more or less—I was publishing in the United States while living in Russia. Socially, who was I? Who were my people? Where did I belong? I had lost some friends and gained others. Some friends had become couples, split up, recoupled, had children. I had coupled and recoupled and had children too.
Also, some of the women I had known had become men. That’s not the way most transgender people phrase it; the default language is one of choicelessness: people say they have always been men or women and now their authentic selves are emerging. This is the same “born this way” approach that the gay and lesbian movement had put to such good political use in the time that I’d been gone: it had gotten queer people access to such institutions as the military and marriage.
The standard story goes something like this: as a child I always felt like a boy, or never felt like a girl, and then I tried to be a lesbian, but the issue wasn’t sexual orientation—it was gender, specifically, “true gender,” which could now be claimed through transitioning. I found myself feeling resentful at hearing these stories. I too had always felt like a boy! It had taken some work for me to enjoy being a woman (whatever that means)—I’d succeeded, I had learned how to be one. But still: here I was, faced with the possibility that in the parallel life that my left-behind self was leading in the United States while I was in Russia, I would have transitioned. True gender (whatever that means) didn’t have much to do with it, but choice did. Somehow, I’d missed the fact that it was there.
I had written an entire book on making choices that had to do with removing the parts of the body that would appear to have made me female: the breasts, the ovaries, the uterus. And I had not questioned the assumptions that after a mastectomy one considers one’s options for reconstruction, and after a radical hysterectomy one considers whether to receive hormone “replacement” in the form of estrogen. Indeed, I had had reconstruction and was taking estrogen. I had failed, miserably, at seeing my choices, made as they were under some duress, as an opportunity for adventure. I had failed to think about inhabiting a different body the way one would think about inhabiting a different country. How do I invent the person I am now?
I quit estrogen and started testosterone. I had some trouble with the evidence part of the science, because, as I have found, all published papers on the use of testosterone in people who start out as women fall into one of two categories: articles that aim to show that people taking testosterone will experience all of the masculinizing changes that they wish for, and ones that aim to show that women will have none of the masculinizing changes that they fear. I am taking a low dose, and I have no idea how it’s going to affect me. My voice has become lower. My body is changing.
But then again, bodies change all the time. In her book The Argonauts Maggie Nelson quotes her partner, the artist Harry Dodge, as saying that he is not going anywhere—not transitioning but being himself. I recognize the sentiment, though I’d probably say the opposite: for thirty-nine years, ever since my parents took those documents to the visa office, I have felt so precarious that I lay no claim to someone I “really am.” That someone is a sequence of choices, and the question is: Will my next choice be conscious, and will my ability to make it be unfettered?
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2018/02/08/to-be-or-not-to-be/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#35200469) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2017 1:32 PM Author: ruby zombie-like jewess
Maria Alexandrovna "Masha" Gessen (Russian: Мари́я Алекса́ндровна Ге́ссен; IPA: [maˈrʲijə ɐlʲɪkˈsandrəvnəˈɡʲesʲɪn]; born 13 January 1967), is a Russian and American journalist, author, translator[2][3] and activist who has been an outspoken critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump.[4]
Gessen has written extensively on LGBT rights. Described as "Russia's leading LGBT rights activist,"[5] she has said that for many years she was "probably the only publicly out gay person in the whole country."[6]
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#34487665)
|
Date: October 20th, 2017 1:34 PM Author: insane indian lodge community account
Claim: "Fallen soldiers are the best one per cent this country produces."
Ruling: FALSE. Fallen soldiers represent far less than 1% of the population, and there is no peer-reviewed research that indicates they are any "better" than anyone else.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#34487688) |
Date: October 20th, 2017 1:36 PM Author: Rebellious irate base
you know who else venerated veterans and dead soldiers? hitler.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#34487712)
|
Date: October 20th, 2017 9:06 PM Author: magical flickering pisswyrm parlor
what in the holy fuck...
these people have gone off the deep end. they need to be 'dealt with'
did a woman write this?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#34491185) |
Date: October 20th, 2017 9:07 PM Author: copper 180 business firm
i made the mistake of buying/reading her putin book. published by penguin, not photocopied and stapled.
pure insanity.
the guy is stealing her socks at the laundromat.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3769600&forum_id=2#34491186)
|
|
|