Posner (as dist. judge) reversed per curiam for berating a pro se defendant
| Zombie-like theatre | 10/24/17 | | Razzmatazz internet-worthy background story affirmative action | 10/24/17 | | vibrant lemon turdskin | 10/25/17 | | mind-boggling crystalline nursing home | 10/25/17 | | Curious Brass Brunch | 10/24/17 | | Zombie-like theatre | 10/24/17 | | maniacal mental disorder gay wizard | 10/24/17 | | Razzle Pale State Fat Ankles | 10/24/17 | | Splenetic Aphrodisiac Bawdyhouse Degenerate | 10/24/17 | | Razzmatazz internet-worthy background story affirmative action | 10/24/17 | | maniacal mental disorder gay wizard | 10/24/17 | | yapping jewess | 10/25/17 | | Zombie-like theatre | 10/24/17 | | Jet-lagged Elastic Band | 10/24/17 | | Razzle Pale State Fat Ankles | 10/24/17 | | ruddy old irish cottage school | 10/25/17 | | self-centered jew | 10/24/17 | | Sticky titillating toaster | 10/24/17 | | Razzmatazz internet-worthy background story affirmative action | 10/24/17 | | soul-stirring poppy national security agency center | 10/24/17 | | Sticky titillating toaster | 10/24/17 | | Splenetic Aphrodisiac Bawdyhouse Degenerate | 10/24/17 | | Razzle Pale State Fat Ankles | 10/24/17 | | Zombie-like theatre | 10/24/17 | | Jet-lagged Elastic Band | 10/24/17 | | Walnut giraffe voyeur | 10/24/17 | | Dun Half-breed | 10/25/17 | | Vivacious Black Woman Station | 10/24/17 | | vibrant lemon turdskin | 10/25/17 | | Curious Brass Brunch | 10/24/17 | | canary lay masturbator | 10/24/17 | | brilliant pocket flask | 10/24/17 | | canary lay masturbator | 10/24/17 | | Walnut giraffe voyeur | 10/24/17 | | Splenetic Aphrodisiac Bawdyhouse Degenerate | 10/24/17 | | Zombie-like theatre | 10/24/17 | | Curious Brass Brunch | 10/24/17 | | ruddy old irish cottage school | 10/25/17 | | Razzle Pale State Fat Ankles | 10/24/17 | | Dun Half-breed | 10/25/17 | | filthy confused dragon | 10/24/17 | | iridescent hell new version | 10/24/17 | | filthy confused dragon | 10/24/17 | | mind-boggling crystalline nursing home | 10/25/17 | | Razzle Pale State Fat Ankles | 10/24/17 | | razzle-dazzle church building newt | 10/24/17 | | Zombie-like theatre | 10/24/17 | | swashbuckling stead sneaky criminal | 10/24/17 | | copper spot gaming laptop | 10/24/17 | | brindle round eye personal credit line | 03/22/18 | | iridescent hell new version | 10/24/17 | | Razzmatazz internet-worthy background story affirmative action | 10/24/17 | | mentally impaired deranged volcanic crater | 10/24/17 | | Curious Brass Brunch | 10/25/17 | | Out-of-control fragrant school cafeteria partner | 10/25/17 | | Curious Brass Brunch | 10/25/17 | | canary lay masturbator | 10/24/17 | | Vivacious Black Woman Station | 10/24/17 | | canary lay masturbator | 10/25/17 | | yapping jewess | 10/25/17 | | ruddy old irish cottage school | 10/25/17 | | yapping jewess | 10/25/17 | | ruddy old irish cottage school | 10/25/17 | | Curious Brass Brunch | 10/25/17 | | yapping jewess | 10/25/17 | | Charcoal Sweet Tailpipe | 03/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:43 PM Author: Splenetic Aphrodisiac Bawdyhouse Degenerate
Where does it say posner was the trial judge?
Edit: "circuit judge" had me confused.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521716) |
|
Date: October 25th, 2017 9:46 AM Author: ruddy old irish cottage school
same, I assumed this would be some lame "gotcha" citing a 25 year old decision. No it happened while Posner was busily berating other members of the bench for mistreating pro se defendants.
I also like how they cite Posner's own 7th circuit cases against him.
Notably it's per curiam. no one wanted to risk a vendetta.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34524259) |
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:48 PM Author: Sticky titillating toaster
lol, sovereign citizens are amazing.
And lol @ Posner getting overturned. Surprised it's not harmless but I wonder if his former colleagues just want to torment him
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521754) |
|
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:58 PM Author: Zombie-like theatre
No, this opinion is particularly hilarious in light of his retirement.
Posner retired in indignation because he wanted to publish internal 7th Circuit documents (including correspondence with Wood) about how the court treats pro she appellants badly and don't give them enough help.
Then, today, Posner is reversed for berating a pro she litigating.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521841) |
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:55 PM Author: Splenetic Aphrodisiac Bawdyhouse Degenerate
http://ca3blog.com/judges/posners-new-book-is-bananas-but-you-might-want-it-anyway/
And why did Posner anoint himself as filter between the staff attorneys and his colleagues? Largely, he says, because “uniquely among this court’s judges, [he had] a deeply felt commitment to the welfare of the pro se litigants.” But, by his own account, he only “became interested in the staff attorney program in the late winter/early spring of this year (2017).” And in his preceding three and a half decades on the court, “I’m pretty sure I’d never even discussed it with another judge.” Deeply? Uniquely?
It gets worse. Posner chooses to reveal the initial panel vote in a still-not-yet-decided appeal that he identifies by name. The other two panel members plan to affirm, he tells us. (Posner disagrees, so we get two paragraphs summarizing and quoting from the dissent he would have filed.) What compelling reason led him to include this stunning disclosure in a book ostensibly about pro se’s and televising arguments, when this case has nothing to do with either? Because “I’ve decided to note two recent clashes with colleagues.” This is not Posner-being-Posner, this is madness.
The other “clash” he chooses to recount is when he emailed all the judges on the court to tell them he thought it odd that some judges referred to Wood as “Chief Diane.” He admits this one “doesn’t reflect credit on me” and, “In retrospect, I cannot understand what moved me to email the judges ….” Me neither.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521807) |
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:55 PM Author: Razzle Pale State Fat Ankles
Model jury instructions:
[O]ne [element] is that ... the scheme to defraud involved a materially false or fraudulent pre- tense, representation, or promise. That’s very important, that notion of materiality. Because if you—sometimes people will lie, for example, out of embarrassment. You know, someone asks your age, you knock a couple of years off, or something like that. That would—those are not—those little white lies, those are not mate- rial falsehoods. They don’t—I mean, they may embarrass you when it’s discovered, but they’re not—that’s not wrongful conduct. It’s when, with specific reference to our case, if you—if you tell—if you tell the Internal Revenue Ser- vice a lie which is capable of getting them to do something which they would never do if they knew the truth, namely, give you $300,000 to which you’re not entitled, that is a material falsehood. That’s fraud. And that is an element of the charges.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521810) |
Date: October 25th, 2017 9:41 AM Author: yapping jewess
lulz at are IRS:
" Between August 2009 and November 2010, El-Bey filed a total of six tax returns by mail with the IRS in the name of the trust, each seeking a $300,000 refund. Each return was essentially identical: each claimed $900,000 in trust income, $900,000 in fees, $7,590 in exemptions, and $300,000 in withholding. Based on this return, the IRS issued and mailed a $300,000 refund check to 'Hakeem El Bey Trust, Hakeem El Bey Trustee.'"
"Hey, guys, you withheld $300,000 from my trust and totally owe it back to me. Please handle, thanks."
"Seems legit. Here's your money. Thank."
Makes you wonder how much low level outright fraud goes on without ever being detected. If he was less greedy and asked for a $30,000 "refund," would it have been too low dollar for anybody to check into?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34524226) |
Date: March 22nd, 2018 3:07 AM Author: Charcoal Sweet Tailpipe
Not so hidden lesson: The IRS will give you $300,00 two out of every five times you ask for it.
We can still maek it!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#35659357)
|
|
|